Cargando…

Metabolic cost of flight and aerobic efficiency in the rose chafer, Protaetia cuprea (Cetoniinae)

Rose chafer beetles (Protetia cuprea) are pollinators as well as agricultural pests, flying between flowers and trees while foraging for pollen and fruits. Calculating the energy they expend on flying during foraging activity faces the challenge of measuring the metabolic rate (MR) of free‐flying in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Urca, Tomer, Levin, Eran, Ribak, Gal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9790465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35142427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.13011
_version_ 1784859183342944256
author Urca, Tomer
Levin, Eran
Ribak, Gal
author_facet Urca, Tomer
Levin, Eran
Ribak, Gal
author_sort Urca, Tomer
collection PubMed
description Rose chafer beetles (Protetia cuprea) are pollinators as well as agricultural pests, flying between flowers and trees while foraging for pollen and fruits. Calculating the energy they expend on flying during foraging activity faces the challenge of measuring the metabolic rate (MR) of free‐flying insects in an open space. We overcame this challenge by using the bolus injection of (13)C Na‐bicarbonate technique to measure their metabolic energy expenditure while flying in a large flight arena. Concurrently, we tracked the insects with high‐speed cameras to extract their flight trajectory, from which we calculated the mechanical power invested in flying for each flight bout. We found that the chemical (metabolic) energy input converted to mechanical flight energy output at a mean efficiency of 10.4% ± 5.2%, with a trend of increased efficiency in larger conspecifics (efficiency scaled with body mass to the power of 1.4). The transition in the summer from a diet of pollen to that of fruits may affect the energy budget available for foraging. Starved P. cuprea, feeding on apples ad libitum, increased their body mass by an average of 6% in 2 h. According to our calculations, such a meal can power a 630‐m flight (assuming a carbohydrate assimilation efficiency of 90%). Pollen, with a low water and carbohydrate content but rich in proteins and lipids, has a higher caloric content and should assimilate differently when converting food to flight fuel. The high cost of aerial locomotion is inherent to the foraging behavior of rose chafers, explaining their short flight bouts followed by prolonged feeding activity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9790465
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97904652022-12-28 Metabolic cost of flight and aerobic efficiency in the rose chafer, Protaetia cuprea (Cetoniinae) Urca, Tomer Levin, Eran Ribak, Gal Insect Sci Original Articles Rose chafer beetles (Protetia cuprea) are pollinators as well as agricultural pests, flying between flowers and trees while foraging for pollen and fruits. Calculating the energy they expend on flying during foraging activity faces the challenge of measuring the metabolic rate (MR) of free‐flying insects in an open space. We overcame this challenge by using the bolus injection of (13)C Na‐bicarbonate technique to measure their metabolic energy expenditure while flying in a large flight arena. Concurrently, we tracked the insects with high‐speed cameras to extract their flight trajectory, from which we calculated the mechanical power invested in flying for each flight bout. We found that the chemical (metabolic) energy input converted to mechanical flight energy output at a mean efficiency of 10.4% ± 5.2%, with a trend of increased efficiency in larger conspecifics (efficiency scaled with body mass to the power of 1.4). The transition in the summer from a diet of pollen to that of fruits may affect the energy budget available for foraging. Starved P. cuprea, feeding on apples ad libitum, increased their body mass by an average of 6% in 2 h. According to our calculations, such a meal can power a 630‐m flight (assuming a carbohydrate assimilation efficiency of 90%). Pollen, with a low water and carbohydrate content but rich in proteins and lipids, has a higher caloric content and should assimilate differently when converting food to flight fuel. The high cost of aerial locomotion is inherent to the foraging behavior of rose chafers, explaining their short flight bouts followed by prolonged feeding activity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-26 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9790465/ /pubmed/35142427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.13011 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Insect Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Urca, Tomer
Levin, Eran
Ribak, Gal
Metabolic cost of flight and aerobic efficiency in the rose chafer, Protaetia cuprea (Cetoniinae)
title Metabolic cost of flight and aerobic efficiency in the rose chafer, Protaetia cuprea (Cetoniinae)
title_full Metabolic cost of flight and aerobic efficiency in the rose chafer, Protaetia cuprea (Cetoniinae)
title_fullStr Metabolic cost of flight and aerobic efficiency in the rose chafer, Protaetia cuprea (Cetoniinae)
title_full_unstemmed Metabolic cost of flight and aerobic efficiency in the rose chafer, Protaetia cuprea (Cetoniinae)
title_short Metabolic cost of flight and aerobic efficiency in the rose chafer, Protaetia cuprea (Cetoniinae)
title_sort metabolic cost of flight and aerobic efficiency in the rose chafer, protaetia cuprea (cetoniinae)
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9790465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35142427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.13011
work_keys_str_mv AT urcatomer metaboliccostofflightandaerobicefficiencyintherosechaferprotaetiacupreacetoniinae
AT levineran metaboliccostofflightandaerobicefficiencyintherosechaferprotaetiacupreacetoniinae
AT ribakgal metaboliccostofflightandaerobicefficiencyintherosechaferprotaetiacupreacetoniinae