Cargando…

Incorporating historical control information in ANCOVA models using the meta‐analytic‐predictive approach

The meta‐analytic‐predictive (MAP) approach is a Bayesian meta‐analytic method to synthesize and incorporate information from historical controls in the analysis of a new trial. Classically, only a single parameter, typically the intercept or rate, is assumed to vary across studies, which may not be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qi, Hongchao, Rizopoulos, Dimitris, van Rosmalen, Joost
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9790567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35439840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1561
_version_ 1784859207258865664
author Qi, Hongchao
Rizopoulos, Dimitris
van Rosmalen, Joost
author_facet Qi, Hongchao
Rizopoulos, Dimitris
van Rosmalen, Joost
author_sort Qi, Hongchao
collection PubMed
description The meta‐analytic‐predictive (MAP) approach is a Bayesian meta‐analytic method to synthesize and incorporate information from historical controls in the analysis of a new trial. Classically, only a single parameter, typically the intercept or rate, is assumed to vary across studies, which may not be realistic in more complex models. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) is often used to analyze trials with a pretest–posttest design, where both the intercept and the baseline effect (coefficient of the outcome at baseline) affect the estimated treatment effect. We extended the MAP approach to ANCOVA, to allow for variation in the intercept and the baseline effect across studies, and possibly also correlation between these parameters. The method was illustrated using data from the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study (ADCS) and assessed with a simulation study. In the ADCS data, the proposed multivariate MAP approach yielded a prior effective sample size of 79 and 58 for the intercept and the baseline effect respectively and reduced the posterior standard deviation of the treatment effect by 12.6%. The result was robust to the choice of prior for the between‐study variation. In the simulations, the proposed approach yielded power gains with a good control of the type I error rate. Ignoring the between‐study correlation of the parameters or assuming no variation in the baseline effect generally led to less power gain. In conclusion, the MAP approach can be extended to a multivariate version for ANCOVA, which may improve the estimation of the treatment effect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9790567
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97905672022-12-28 Incorporating historical control information in ANCOVA models using the meta‐analytic‐predictive approach Qi, Hongchao Rizopoulos, Dimitris van Rosmalen, Joost Res Synth Methods Research Articles The meta‐analytic‐predictive (MAP) approach is a Bayesian meta‐analytic method to synthesize and incorporate information from historical controls in the analysis of a new trial. Classically, only a single parameter, typically the intercept or rate, is assumed to vary across studies, which may not be realistic in more complex models. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) is often used to analyze trials with a pretest–posttest design, where both the intercept and the baseline effect (coefficient of the outcome at baseline) affect the estimated treatment effect. We extended the MAP approach to ANCOVA, to allow for variation in the intercept and the baseline effect across studies, and possibly also correlation between these parameters. The method was illustrated using data from the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study (ADCS) and assessed with a simulation study. In the ADCS data, the proposed multivariate MAP approach yielded a prior effective sample size of 79 and 58 for the intercept and the baseline effect respectively and reduced the posterior standard deviation of the treatment effect by 12.6%. The result was robust to the choice of prior for the between‐study variation. In the simulations, the proposed approach yielded power gains with a good control of the type I error rate. Ignoring the between‐study correlation of the parameters or assuming no variation in the baseline effect generally led to less power gain. In conclusion, the MAP approach can be extended to a multivariate version for ANCOVA, which may improve the estimation of the treatment effect. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-26 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9790567/ /pubmed/35439840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1561 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Research Synthesis Methods published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Qi, Hongchao
Rizopoulos, Dimitris
van Rosmalen, Joost
Incorporating historical control information in ANCOVA models using the meta‐analytic‐predictive approach
title Incorporating historical control information in ANCOVA models using the meta‐analytic‐predictive approach
title_full Incorporating historical control information in ANCOVA models using the meta‐analytic‐predictive approach
title_fullStr Incorporating historical control information in ANCOVA models using the meta‐analytic‐predictive approach
title_full_unstemmed Incorporating historical control information in ANCOVA models using the meta‐analytic‐predictive approach
title_short Incorporating historical control information in ANCOVA models using the meta‐analytic‐predictive approach
title_sort incorporating historical control information in ancova models using the meta‐analytic‐predictive approach
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9790567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35439840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1561
work_keys_str_mv AT qihongchao incorporatinghistoricalcontrolinformationinancovamodelsusingthemetaanalyticpredictiveapproach
AT rizopoulosdimitris incorporatinghistoricalcontrolinformationinancovamodelsusingthemetaanalyticpredictiveapproach
AT vanrosmalenjoost incorporatinghistoricalcontrolinformationinancovamodelsusingthemetaanalyticpredictiveapproach