Cargando…
A practical guide for strategic and efficient sampling in African swine fever‐affected pig farms
In the case of African swine fever (ASF) outbreaks in pig farms, EU legislation requires a thorough epidemiological investigation to determine, among other tasks, the extent of infection in the affected farm. The main aim of this study was to implement a reliable sampling strategy to quickly obtain...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9790576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35502726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tbed.14582 |
_version_ | 1784859209516449792 |
---|---|
author | Lamberga, Kristīne Depner, Klaus Zani, Laura Oļševskis, Edvīns Seržants, Mārtiņš Ansonska, Santa Šteingolde, Žanete Bērziņš, Aivars Viltrop, Arvo Blome, Sandra Globig, Anja |
author_facet | Lamberga, Kristīne Depner, Klaus Zani, Laura Oļševskis, Edvīns Seržants, Mārtiņš Ansonska, Santa Šteingolde, Žanete Bērziņš, Aivars Viltrop, Arvo Blome, Sandra Globig, Anja |
author_sort | Lamberga, Kristīne |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the case of African swine fever (ASF) outbreaks in pig farms, EU legislation requires a thorough epidemiological investigation to determine, among other tasks, the extent of infection in the affected farm. The main aim of this study was to implement a reliable sampling strategy to quickly obtain an overview of the extent of ASF virus spread in an affected pig farm. We developed and tested a three‐step approach: (i) identification of sub‐units within the affected farm, (ii) categorization of sub‐units, and (iii) targeted selection of animals for testing. We used commercially available lateral flow devices (LFDs) to detect ASF antigen and antibodies under field conditions and compared them with routinely performed laboratory tests (qPCR, ELISA, IPT). The study was conducted in three commercial farms in Latvia that were affected by ASF in July 2020. One of the affected farms was relatively small with only 31 pigs, whereas the other two were large with 1800 and 9800 animals, respectively. The approach proved to be helpful and practical for efficient and reliably assess the ASF situation on the farm and to identify sub‐units within a farm where infected animals are present and sub‐units which might (still) be free of infection. This important epidemiological information helps to better estimate the high‐risk period and to track the potential spread of infection outside the farm. It allows also to prioritize culling and, if appropriate, to pursue a partial culling strategy taking into account the absence of clinical signs, implemented biosecurity measures, quarantine and negative test results, among others. This might be of interest for large commercial farms where the infection was identified very early and has not yet spread widely. Due to its limited sensitivity, the antigen LFD test is useful for testing animals showing signs of disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9790576 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97905762022-12-28 A practical guide for strategic and efficient sampling in African swine fever‐affected pig farms Lamberga, Kristīne Depner, Klaus Zani, Laura Oļševskis, Edvīns Seržants, Mārtiņš Ansonska, Santa Šteingolde, Žanete Bērziņš, Aivars Viltrop, Arvo Blome, Sandra Globig, Anja Transbound Emerg Dis Original Articles In the case of African swine fever (ASF) outbreaks in pig farms, EU legislation requires a thorough epidemiological investigation to determine, among other tasks, the extent of infection in the affected farm. The main aim of this study was to implement a reliable sampling strategy to quickly obtain an overview of the extent of ASF virus spread in an affected pig farm. We developed and tested a three‐step approach: (i) identification of sub‐units within the affected farm, (ii) categorization of sub‐units, and (iii) targeted selection of animals for testing. We used commercially available lateral flow devices (LFDs) to detect ASF antigen and antibodies under field conditions and compared them with routinely performed laboratory tests (qPCR, ELISA, IPT). The study was conducted in three commercial farms in Latvia that were affected by ASF in July 2020. One of the affected farms was relatively small with only 31 pigs, whereas the other two were large with 1800 and 9800 animals, respectively. The approach proved to be helpful and practical for efficient and reliably assess the ASF situation on the farm and to identify sub‐units within a farm where infected animals are present and sub‐units which might (still) be free of infection. This important epidemiological information helps to better estimate the high‐risk period and to track the potential spread of infection outside the farm. It allows also to prioritize culling and, if appropriate, to pursue a partial culling strategy taking into account the absence of clinical signs, implemented biosecurity measures, quarantine and negative test results, among others. This might be of interest for large commercial farms where the infection was identified very early and has not yet spread widely. Due to its limited sensitivity, the antigen LFD test is useful for testing animals showing signs of disease. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-11 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9790576/ /pubmed/35502726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tbed.14582 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Lamberga, Kristīne Depner, Klaus Zani, Laura Oļševskis, Edvīns Seržants, Mārtiņš Ansonska, Santa Šteingolde, Žanete Bērziņš, Aivars Viltrop, Arvo Blome, Sandra Globig, Anja A practical guide for strategic and efficient sampling in African swine fever‐affected pig farms |
title | A practical guide for strategic and efficient sampling in African swine fever‐affected pig farms |
title_full | A practical guide for strategic and efficient sampling in African swine fever‐affected pig farms |
title_fullStr | A practical guide for strategic and efficient sampling in African swine fever‐affected pig farms |
title_full_unstemmed | A practical guide for strategic and efficient sampling in African swine fever‐affected pig farms |
title_short | A practical guide for strategic and efficient sampling in African swine fever‐affected pig farms |
title_sort | practical guide for strategic and efficient sampling in african swine fever‐affected pig farms |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9790576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35502726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tbed.14582 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lambergakristine apracticalguideforstrategicandefficientsamplinginafricanswinefeveraffectedpigfarms AT depnerklaus apracticalguideforstrategicandefficientsamplinginafricanswinefeveraffectedpigfarms AT zanilaura apracticalguideforstrategicandefficientsamplinginafricanswinefeveraffectedpigfarms AT olsevskisedvins apracticalguideforstrategicandefficientsamplinginafricanswinefeveraffectedpigfarms AT serzantsmartins apracticalguideforstrategicandefficientsamplinginafricanswinefeveraffectedpigfarms AT ansonskasanta apracticalguideforstrategicandefficientsamplinginafricanswinefeveraffectedpigfarms AT steingoldezanete apracticalguideforstrategicandefficientsamplinginafricanswinefeveraffectedpigfarms AT berzinsaivars apracticalguideforstrategicandefficientsamplinginafricanswinefeveraffectedpigfarms AT viltroparvo apracticalguideforstrategicandefficientsamplinginafricanswinefeveraffectedpigfarms AT blomesandra apracticalguideforstrategicandefficientsamplinginafricanswinefeveraffectedpigfarms AT globiganja apracticalguideforstrategicandefficientsamplinginafricanswinefeveraffectedpigfarms AT lambergakristine practicalguideforstrategicandefficientsamplinginafricanswinefeveraffectedpigfarms AT depnerklaus practicalguideforstrategicandefficientsamplinginafricanswinefeveraffectedpigfarms AT zanilaura practicalguideforstrategicandefficientsamplinginafricanswinefeveraffectedpigfarms AT olsevskisedvins practicalguideforstrategicandefficientsamplinginafricanswinefeveraffectedpigfarms AT serzantsmartins practicalguideforstrategicandefficientsamplinginafricanswinefeveraffectedpigfarms AT ansonskasanta practicalguideforstrategicandefficientsamplinginafricanswinefeveraffectedpigfarms AT steingoldezanete practicalguideforstrategicandefficientsamplinginafricanswinefeveraffectedpigfarms AT berzinsaivars practicalguideforstrategicandefficientsamplinginafricanswinefeveraffectedpigfarms AT viltroparvo practicalguideforstrategicandefficientsamplinginafricanswinefeveraffectedpigfarms AT blomesandra practicalguideforstrategicandefficientsamplinginafricanswinefeveraffectedpigfarms AT globiganja practicalguideforstrategicandefficientsamplinginafricanswinefeveraffectedpigfarms |