Cargando…

Internalizing and externalizing correlates of parental overprotection as measured by the EMBU: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Aspects of parenting including overprotection explain individual differences in child adjustment. This review and meta‐analysis summarizes studies on parental overprotection and internalizing and externalizing problems. To ensure that findings could be compared as systematically as possible, the foc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Roo, Marthe, Veenstra, René, Kretschmer, Tina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9790597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36588978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sode.12590
_version_ 1784859214738358272
author de Roo, Marthe
Veenstra, René
Kretschmer, Tina
author_facet de Roo, Marthe
Veenstra, René
Kretschmer, Tina
author_sort de Roo, Marthe
collection PubMed
description Aspects of parenting including overprotection explain individual differences in child adjustment. This review and meta‐analysis summarizes studies on parental overprotection and internalizing and externalizing problems. To ensure that findings could be compared as systematically as possible, the focus was on studies that used the overprotection scale of the Egna Minnen Beträffande Uppfostran (“Memories of my Parents’ Upbringing”) (EMBU) questionnaire, a popular instrument to measure parental overprotection. In total, we extracted 176 effects from 29 studies. A modified version of the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale was used to perform quality assessments for the included studies. Parental overprotection was associated positively with offspring internalizing and externalizing problems, with overall estimates ranging from r = .14 to .18. Moderator analyses suggested that effects of maternal were larger than effects of paternal overprotection. Other factors that moderated the strength of the association between overprotection and maladjustment included whether outcomes were self‐reported or parent‐reported, the design was cross‐sectional or longitudinal, and publication year. Cultural context, age at exposure, and child sex did not explain differences between effect sizes. Most findings were based on cross‐sectional studies and therefore do not constitute proof of causal relations. Many studies were of less‐than‐satisfactory quality regarding representativeness of the sample, descriptions of the data collection, and statistical analyses. There is a clear need for well‐powered longitudinal studies to strengthen inferences about associations between parental overprotection and internalizing and externalizing problems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9790597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97905972022-12-28 Internalizing and externalizing correlates of parental overprotection as measured by the EMBU: A systematic review and meta‐analysis de Roo, Marthe Veenstra, René Kretschmer, Tina Soc Dev Review Articles Aspects of parenting including overprotection explain individual differences in child adjustment. This review and meta‐analysis summarizes studies on parental overprotection and internalizing and externalizing problems. To ensure that findings could be compared as systematically as possible, the focus was on studies that used the overprotection scale of the Egna Minnen Beträffande Uppfostran (“Memories of my Parents’ Upbringing”) (EMBU) questionnaire, a popular instrument to measure parental overprotection. In total, we extracted 176 effects from 29 studies. A modified version of the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale was used to perform quality assessments for the included studies. Parental overprotection was associated positively with offspring internalizing and externalizing problems, with overall estimates ranging from r = .14 to .18. Moderator analyses suggested that effects of maternal were larger than effects of paternal overprotection. Other factors that moderated the strength of the association between overprotection and maladjustment included whether outcomes were self‐reported or parent‐reported, the design was cross‐sectional or longitudinal, and publication year. Cultural context, age at exposure, and child sex did not explain differences between effect sizes. Most findings were based on cross‐sectional studies and therefore do not constitute proof of causal relations. Many studies were of less‐than‐satisfactory quality regarding representativeness of the sample, descriptions of the data collection, and statistical analyses. There is a clear need for well‐powered longitudinal studies to strengthen inferences about associations between parental overprotection and internalizing and externalizing problems. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-15 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9790597/ /pubmed/36588978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sode.12590 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Social Development published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Review Articles
de Roo, Marthe
Veenstra, René
Kretschmer, Tina
Internalizing and externalizing correlates of parental overprotection as measured by the EMBU: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title Internalizing and externalizing correlates of parental overprotection as measured by the EMBU: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Internalizing and externalizing correlates of parental overprotection as measured by the EMBU: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Internalizing and externalizing correlates of parental overprotection as measured by the EMBU: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Internalizing and externalizing correlates of parental overprotection as measured by the EMBU: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Internalizing and externalizing correlates of parental overprotection as measured by the EMBU: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort internalizing and externalizing correlates of parental overprotection as measured by the embu: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9790597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36588978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sode.12590
work_keys_str_mv AT deroomarthe internalizingandexternalizingcorrelatesofparentaloverprotectionasmeasuredbytheembuasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT veenstrarene internalizingandexternalizingcorrelatesofparentaloverprotectionasmeasuredbytheembuasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kretschmertina internalizingandexternalizingcorrelatesofparentaloverprotectionasmeasuredbytheembuasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis