Cargando…

What Is the Effect of COVID-19 Social Distancing on Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma Related to Domestic Violence?

PURPOSE: To understand the impact of social distancing policies on the incidence and severity of oral and maxillofacial trauma (OMT) secondary to interpersonal violence (IPV) and domestic violence (DV). METHODS: The authors designed a retrospective cohort study enrolling subjects who presented to an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marchant, Andrew D., Gray, Sterling, Ludwig, David C., Dillon, Jasjit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9790760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34454868
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2021.07.020
_version_ 1784859251608387584
author Marchant, Andrew D.
Gray, Sterling
Ludwig, David C.
Dillon, Jasjit
author_facet Marchant, Andrew D.
Gray, Sterling
Ludwig, David C.
Dillon, Jasjit
author_sort Marchant, Andrew D.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To understand the impact of social distancing policies on the incidence and severity of oral and maxillofacial trauma (OMT) secondary to interpersonal violence (IPV) and domestic violence (DV). METHODS: The authors designed a retrospective cohort study enrolling subjects who presented to an urban Level 1 trauma center in Seattle, WA, for the evaluation and management of OMT between January 1 and December 31 in the years 2018 through 2020. The primary predictor variable was evaluation of OMT during periods with (2020: investigational group) or without (2018 or 2019: control group) social distancing policies in place. The primary outcome variables were the mechanism and severity of injury, defined as IPV, DV or neither, the abbreviated injury scale (AIS) and the injury severity score (ISS). Descriptive, univariate and bivariate analyses were performed with statistical significance at P < .05. RESULTS: Eight hundred twenty-eight subjects; 737 (89%) IPV and 91(11%) IPV due to DV. The incidence of OMT secondary to IPV or DV was unchanged (P = .81, P = .57 respectively). There was a nonsignificant increase in ISS for IPV (P = .07) and no change for DV (P = .46). AIS scores were unchanged for IPV (P = .36). For DV, AIS scores were lower in 2020 when compared to 2019 (P = .04) but unchanged from 2018 (P = .58). At least half of the DV victims were male (50% in 2018, 59% in 2019, and 53% in 2020). Of these, 65% were under 18, and represented the pediatric majority (62%). A nonsignificant increase in non-white subjects presenting with DV in 2020 (P = .15) was seen. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic did not change the number or severity of OMT cases secondary to IPV or DV in this region of Washington. Pediatric males were more likely to be victims of DV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9790760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97907602022-12-27 What Is the Effect of COVID-19 Social Distancing on Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma Related to Domestic Violence? Marchant, Andrew D. Gray, Sterling Ludwig, David C. Dillon, Jasjit J Oral Maxillofac Surg Article PURPOSE: To understand the impact of social distancing policies on the incidence and severity of oral and maxillofacial trauma (OMT) secondary to interpersonal violence (IPV) and domestic violence (DV). METHODS: The authors designed a retrospective cohort study enrolling subjects who presented to an urban Level 1 trauma center in Seattle, WA, for the evaluation and management of OMT between January 1 and December 31 in the years 2018 through 2020. The primary predictor variable was evaluation of OMT during periods with (2020: investigational group) or without (2018 or 2019: control group) social distancing policies in place. The primary outcome variables were the mechanism and severity of injury, defined as IPV, DV or neither, the abbreviated injury scale (AIS) and the injury severity score (ISS). Descriptive, univariate and bivariate analyses were performed with statistical significance at P < .05. RESULTS: Eight hundred twenty-eight subjects; 737 (89%) IPV and 91(11%) IPV due to DV. The incidence of OMT secondary to IPV or DV was unchanged (P = .81, P = .57 respectively). There was a nonsignificant increase in ISS for IPV (P = .07) and no change for DV (P = .46). AIS scores were unchanged for IPV (P = .36). For DV, AIS scores were lower in 2020 when compared to 2019 (P = .04) but unchanged from 2018 (P = .58). At least half of the DV victims were male (50% in 2018, 59% in 2019, and 53% in 2020). Of these, 65% were under 18, and represented the pediatric majority (62%). A nonsignificant increase in non-white subjects presenting with DV in 2020 (P = .15) was seen. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic did not change the number or severity of OMT cases secondary to IPV or DV in this region of Washington. Pediatric males were more likely to be victims of DV. The American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. 2021-11 2021-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9790760/ /pubmed/34454868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2021.07.020 Text en © 2021 The American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Marchant, Andrew D.
Gray, Sterling
Ludwig, David C.
Dillon, Jasjit
What Is the Effect of COVID-19 Social Distancing on Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma Related to Domestic Violence?
title What Is the Effect of COVID-19 Social Distancing on Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma Related to Domestic Violence?
title_full What Is the Effect of COVID-19 Social Distancing on Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma Related to Domestic Violence?
title_fullStr What Is the Effect of COVID-19 Social Distancing on Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma Related to Domestic Violence?
title_full_unstemmed What Is the Effect of COVID-19 Social Distancing on Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma Related to Domestic Violence?
title_short What Is the Effect of COVID-19 Social Distancing on Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma Related to Domestic Violence?
title_sort what is the effect of covid-19 social distancing on oral and maxillofacial trauma related to domestic violence?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9790760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34454868
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2021.07.020
work_keys_str_mv AT marchantandrewd whatistheeffectofcovid19socialdistancingonoralandmaxillofacialtraumarelatedtodomesticviolence
AT graysterling whatistheeffectofcovid19socialdistancingonoralandmaxillofacialtraumarelatedtodomesticviolence
AT ludwigdavidc whatistheeffectofcovid19socialdistancingonoralandmaxillofacialtraumarelatedtodomesticviolence
AT dillonjasjit whatistheeffectofcovid19socialdistancingonoralandmaxillofacialtraumarelatedtodomesticviolence