Cargando…

Comparative efficacy and acceptability of treatments for depressive symptoms in cognitive impairment: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Depressive symptoms play an essential role in cognition decline, while the benefit and acceptability of treatments for depressive symptoms in cognitive impairment are still unknown. OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively evaluate the comparative efficacy and acceptability of treatments for depres...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jin, Boru, Xv, Yunting, Zhang, Bixuan, Qiao, Lei, Liu, Huayan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9790988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36578447
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.1037414
_version_ 1784859299454910464
author Jin, Boru
Xv, Yunting
Zhang, Bixuan
Qiao, Lei
Liu, Huayan
author_facet Jin, Boru
Xv, Yunting
Zhang, Bixuan
Qiao, Lei
Liu, Huayan
author_sort Jin, Boru
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Depressive symptoms play an essential role in cognition decline, while the benefit and acceptability of treatments for depressive symptoms in cognitive impairment are still unknown. OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively evaluate the comparative efficacy and acceptability of treatments for depressive symptoms in cognitive impairment based on the quantitative Bayesian network meta-analysis method (NMA). METHOD: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and PsycINFO from inception until August 2022 to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating treatments for depressive symptoms in cognitive impairment. Efficacy was evaluated by the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) for depression; the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) and the Cohen–Mansfeld Agitation Inventory (CMAI) for behavior; and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for cognition. Safety was evaluated by total adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, diarrhea, headache, and nausea. RESULTS: In this study, 13,043 participants from 107 RCTs were included, involving 28 treatments and the discontinuation of antidepressants. On CSDD, aerobic exercise (MD −4.51, 95%CrI −8.60 to −0.37), aripiprazole (MD −1.85, 95%CrI −3.66 to −0.02), behavioral training (MD −1.14, 95%CrI −2.04 to −0.34), electrical current stimulation (MD −3.30, 95%CrI −5.94 to −0.73), massage (MD −12.67, 95%CrI −14.71 to −10.59), music therapy (MD −2.63, 95%CrI −4.72 to −0.58), and reminiscence therapy (MD −2.34, 95%CrI −3.51 to −1.25) significantly outperformed the placebo. On MMSE, cognitive stimulation therapy (MD 1.42, 95%CrI 0.49 to 2.39), electrical current stimulation (MD 4.08, 95%CrI 1.07 to 7.11), and reminiscence therapy (MD 1.31, 95%CrI 0.04 to 2.91) significantly outperformed the placebo. Additionally, no treatments showed a significantly higher risk than the placebo. CONCLUSION: Our NMAs indicated that non-pharmacological interventions were more efficacious and safe than pharmacological treatments for reducing depressive symptoms as well as improving cognitive impairment. Electrical current stimulation, aerobic exercise, and reminiscence therapy could be first recommended considering their beneficial performance on both depression and cognition. Hence, non-pharmacological treatments deserve more attention and extensive application and should at least be considered as an alternative or assistance in clinical settings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021239621, identifier: CRD42021239621.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9790988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97909882022-12-27 Comparative efficacy and acceptability of treatments for depressive symptoms in cognitive impairment: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis Jin, Boru Xv, Yunting Zhang, Bixuan Qiao, Lei Liu, Huayan Front Aging Neurosci Aging Neuroscience BACKGROUND: Depressive symptoms play an essential role in cognition decline, while the benefit and acceptability of treatments for depressive symptoms in cognitive impairment are still unknown. OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively evaluate the comparative efficacy and acceptability of treatments for depressive symptoms in cognitive impairment based on the quantitative Bayesian network meta-analysis method (NMA). METHOD: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and PsycINFO from inception until August 2022 to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating treatments for depressive symptoms in cognitive impairment. Efficacy was evaluated by the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) for depression; the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) and the Cohen–Mansfeld Agitation Inventory (CMAI) for behavior; and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for cognition. Safety was evaluated by total adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, diarrhea, headache, and nausea. RESULTS: In this study, 13,043 participants from 107 RCTs were included, involving 28 treatments and the discontinuation of antidepressants. On CSDD, aerobic exercise (MD −4.51, 95%CrI −8.60 to −0.37), aripiprazole (MD −1.85, 95%CrI −3.66 to −0.02), behavioral training (MD −1.14, 95%CrI −2.04 to −0.34), electrical current stimulation (MD −3.30, 95%CrI −5.94 to −0.73), massage (MD −12.67, 95%CrI −14.71 to −10.59), music therapy (MD −2.63, 95%CrI −4.72 to −0.58), and reminiscence therapy (MD −2.34, 95%CrI −3.51 to −1.25) significantly outperformed the placebo. On MMSE, cognitive stimulation therapy (MD 1.42, 95%CrI 0.49 to 2.39), electrical current stimulation (MD 4.08, 95%CrI 1.07 to 7.11), and reminiscence therapy (MD 1.31, 95%CrI 0.04 to 2.91) significantly outperformed the placebo. Additionally, no treatments showed a significantly higher risk than the placebo. CONCLUSION: Our NMAs indicated that non-pharmacological interventions were more efficacious and safe than pharmacological treatments for reducing depressive symptoms as well as improving cognitive impairment. Electrical current stimulation, aerobic exercise, and reminiscence therapy could be first recommended considering their beneficial performance on both depression and cognition. Hence, non-pharmacological treatments deserve more attention and extensive application and should at least be considered as an alternative or assistance in clinical settings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021239621, identifier: CRD42021239621. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9790988/ /pubmed/36578447 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.1037414 Text en Copyright © 2022 Jin, Xv, Zhang, Qiao and Liu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Aging Neuroscience
Jin, Boru
Xv, Yunting
Zhang, Bixuan
Qiao, Lei
Liu, Huayan
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of treatments for depressive symptoms in cognitive impairment: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
title Comparative efficacy and acceptability of treatments for depressive symptoms in cognitive impairment: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_full Comparative efficacy and acceptability of treatments for depressive symptoms in cognitive impairment: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy and acceptability of treatments for depressive symptoms in cognitive impairment: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy and acceptability of treatments for depressive symptoms in cognitive impairment: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_short Comparative efficacy and acceptability of treatments for depressive symptoms in cognitive impairment: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_sort comparative efficacy and acceptability of treatments for depressive symptoms in cognitive impairment: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis
topic Aging Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9790988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36578447
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.1037414
work_keys_str_mv AT jinboru comparativeefficacyandacceptabilityoftreatmentsfordepressivesymptomsincognitiveimpairmentasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT xvyunting comparativeefficacyandacceptabilityoftreatmentsfordepressivesymptomsincognitiveimpairmentasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhangbixuan comparativeefficacyandacceptabilityoftreatmentsfordepressivesymptomsincognitiveimpairmentasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT qiaolei comparativeefficacyandacceptabilityoftreatmentsfordepressivesymptomsincognitiveimpairmentasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT liuhuayan comparativeefficacyandacceptabilityoftreatmentsfordepressivesymptomsincognitiveimpairmentasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis