Cargando…

Gut and lung microbiome profiles in pregnant mice

In recent years, microbiome research has expanded from the gastrointestinal tract to other host sites previously thought to be abacterial such as the lungs. Yet, the effects of pregnancy in the lung and gut microbiome remains unclear. Here we examined the changes in the gut and lung microbiome in mi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wiscovitch-Russo, Rosana, Taal, Aji Mary, Kuelbs, Claire, Oldfield, Lauren M., Ramar, MohanKumar, Singh, Harinder, Fedulov, Alexey V., Gonzalez-Juarbe, Norberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9791091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36578567
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.946779
_version_ 1784859322946158592
author Wiscovitch-Russo, Rosana
Taal, Aji Mary
Kuelbs, Claire
Oldfield, Lauren M.
Ramar, MohanKumar
Singh, Harinder
Fedulov, Alexey V.
Gonzalez-Juarbe, Norberto
author_facet Wiscovitch-Russo, Rosana
Taal, Aji Mary
Kuelbs, Claire
Oldfield, Lauren M.
Ramar, MohanKumar
Singh, Harinder
Fedulov, Alexey V.
Gonzalez-Juarbe, Norberto
author_sort Wiscovitch-Russo, Rosana
collection PubMed
description In recent years, microbiome research has expanded from the gastrointestinal tract to other host sites previously thought to be abacterial such as the lungs. Yet, the effects of pregnancy in the lung and gut microbiome remains unclear. Here we examined the changes in the gut and lung microbiome in mice at 14 days of gestation. Lung tissue and stool samples were collected from pregnant and non-pregnant female BALB/c mice, DNA was isolated, amplified, and bacterial specific V4 16S rRNA gene was sequenced. Using an in-house bioinformatic pipeline we assessed the microbial composition of each organ using stool and lung tissue samples. The stool data showed that Lachnospiraceae and Lactobacillaceae were more abundant in the pregnant mice. Likewise, Lactobacillaceae were dominant in the lungs of pregnant mice. However, Streptococcaceae were dominant in the lungs of non-pregnant mice with a low microbial abundance in the pregnant mice. A permutation test showed that pregnancy significantly contributes to the variance in both the lung and stool microbiome. At the same time, we estimate that 49% of the total detected operational taxonomic units were shared between the stool and lung data. After removing common stool-associated bacteria from the lung dataset, no microbial differential abundance was detected between the pregnant and non-pregnant lung microbial community. Thus, pregnancy contributes to variance to the lung and stool microbiome but not in the unique lung microbiota.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9791091
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97910912022-12-27 Gut and lung microbiome profiles in pregnant mice Wiscovitch-Russo, Rosana Taal, Aji Mary Kuelbs, Claire Oldfield, Lauren M. Ramar, MohanKumar Singh, Harinder Fedulov, Alexey V. Gonzalez-Juarbe, Norberto Front Microbiol Microbiology In recent years, microbiome research has expanded from the gastrointestinal tract to other host sites previously thought to be abacterial such as the lungs. Yet, the effects of pregnancy in the lung and gut microbiome remains unclear. Here we examined the changes in the gut and lung microbiome in mice at 14 days of gestation. Lung tissue and stool samples were collected from pregnant and non-pregnant female BALB/c mice, DNA was isolated, amplified, and bacterial specific V4 16S rRNA gene was sequenced. Using an in-house bioinformatic pipeline we assessed the microbial composition of each organ using stool and lung tissue samples. The stool data showed that Lachnospiraceae and Lactobacillaceae were more abundant in the pregnant mice. Likewise, Lactobacillaceae were dominant in the lungs of pregnant mice. However, Streptococcaceae were dominant in the lungs of non-pregnant mice with a low microbial abundance in the pregnant mice. A permutation test showed that pregnancy significantly contributes to the variance in both the lung and stool microbiome. At the same time, we estimate that 49% of the total detected operational taxonomic units were shared between the stool and lung data. After removing common stool-associated bacteria from the lung dataset, no microbial differential abundance was detected between the pregnant and non-pregnant lung microbial community. Thus, pregnancy contributes to variance to the lung and stool microbiome but not in the unique lung microbiota. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9791091/ /pubmed/36578567 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.946779 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wiscovitch-Russo, Taal, Kuelbs, Oldfield, Ramar, Singh, Fedulov and Gonzalez-Juarbe. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Wiscovitch-Russo, Rosana
Taal, Aji Mary
Kuelbs, Claire
Oldfield, Lauren M.
Ramar, MohanKumar
Singh, Harinder
Fedulov, Alexey V.
Gonzalez-Juarbe, Norberto
Gut and lung microbiome profiles in pregnant mice
title Gut and lung microbiome profiles in pregnant mice
title_full Gut and lung microbiome profiles in pregnant mice
title_fullStr Gut and lung microbiome profiles in pregnant mice
title_full_unstemmed Gut and lung microbiome profiles in pregnant mice
title_short Gut and lung microbiome profiles in pregnant mice
title_sort gut and lung microbiome profiles in pregnant mice
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9791091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36578567
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.946779
work_keys_str_mv AT wiscovitchrussorosana gutandlungmicrobiomeprofilesinpregnantmice
AT taalajimary gutandlungmicrobiomeprofilesinpregnantmice
AT kuelbsclaire gutandlungmicrobiomeprofilesinpregnantmice
AT oldfieldlaurenm gutandlungmicrobiomeprofilesinpregnantmice
AT ramarmohankumar gutandlungmicrobiomeprofilesinpregnantmice
AT singhharinder gutandlungmicrobiomeprofilesinpregnantmice
AT fedulovalexeyv gutandlungmicrobiomeprofilesinpregnantmice
AT gonzalezjuarbenorberto gutandlungmicrobiomeprofilesinpregnantmice