Cargando…
Effects of leadership style on coach-athlete relationship, athletes’ motivations, and athlete satisfaction
INTRODUCTION: The current study investigated the impacts of autocratic and democratic leadership styles on the coach-athlete relationship, athletes’ motivations, and athlete satisfaction. METHODS: Survey data were collected from 298 student-athletes (male = 157; 52.7%, female = 141; 47.3%) from 20 d...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9791096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36578680 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1012953 |
_version_ | 1784859324155166720 |
---|---|
author | Jin, Hao Kim, Seungmo Love, Adam Jin, Yun Zhao, Jie |
author_facet | Jin, Hao Kim, Seungmo Love, Adam Jin, Yun Zhao, Jie |
author_sort | Jin, Hao |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The current study investigated the impacts of autocratic and democratic leadership styles on the coach-athlete relationship, athletes’ motivations, and athlete satisfaction. METHODS: Survey data were collected from 298 student-athletes (male = 157; 52.7%, female = 141; 47.3%) from 20 different Chinese collegiate sports. The Structural Equation Model was used to test the hypothesized model. RESULTS: The results indicated democratic leadership had a direct positive influence on the coach-athlete relationship, while autocratic leadership had no direct effect. Both leadership styles did not influence autonomous motivation. The coach-athlete relationship, meanwhile, had a full mediation effect between democratic leadership and athletes’ motivation and satisfaction. In addition, autonomous motivation had a partial mediation effect between the coach-athlete relationship and athlete satisfaction. DISCUSSION: Ultimately, the findings of the current study underscore the need for coaches and administrators to understand the impact of different leadership styles and highlight the importance of democratic leadership in improving athletes’ psychological outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9791096 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97910962022-12-27 Effects of leadership style on coach-athlete relationship, athletes’ motivations, and athlete satisfaction Jin, Hao Kim, Seungmo Love, Adam Jin, Yun Zhao, Jie Front Psychol Psychology INTRODUCTION: The current study investigated the impacts of autocratic and democratic leadership styles on the coach-athlete relationship, athletes’ motivations, and athlete satisfaction. METHODS: Survey data were collected from 298 student-athletes (male = 157; 52.7%, female = 141; 47.3%) from 20 different Chinese collegiate sports. The Structural Equation Model was used to test the hypothesized model. RESULTS: The results indicated democratic leadership had a direct positive influence on the coach-athlete relationship, while autocratic leadership had no direct effect. Both leadership styles did not influence autonomous motivation. The coach-athlete relationship, meanwhile, had a full mediation effect between democratic leadership and athletes’ motivation and satisfaction. In addition, autonomous motivation had a partial mediation effect between the coach-athlete relationship and athlete satisfaction. DISCUSSION: Ultimately, the findings of the current study underscore the need for coaches and administrators to understand the impact of different leadership styles and highlight the importance of democratic leadership in improving athletes’ psychological outcomes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9791096/ /pubmed/36578680 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1012953 Text en Copyright © 2022 Jin, Kim, Love, Jin and Zhao. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Jin, Hao Kim, Seungmo Love, Adam Jin, Yun Zhao, Jie Effects of leadership style on coach-athlete relationship, athletes’ motivations, and athlete satisfaction |
title | Effects of leadership style on coach-athlete relationship, athletes’ motivations, and athlete satisfaction |
title_full | Effects of leadership style on coach-athlete relationship, athletes’ motivations, and athlete satisfaction |
title_fullStr | Effects of leadership style on coach-athlete relationship, athletes’ motivations, and athlete satisfaction |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of leadership style on coach-athlete relationship, athletes’ motivations, and athlete satisfaction |
title_short | Effects of leadership style on coach-athlete relationship, athletes’ motivations, and athlete satisfaction |
title_sort | effects of leadership style on coach-athlete relationship, athletes’ motivations, and athlete satisfaction |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9791096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36578680 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1012953 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jinhao effectsofleadershipstyleoncoachathleterelationshipathletesmotivationsandathletesatisfaction AT kimseungmo effectsofleadershipstyleoncoachathleterelationshipathletesmotivationsandathletesatisfaction AT loveadam effectsofleadershipstyleoncoachathleterelationshipathletesmotivationsandathletesatisfaction AT jinyun effectsofleadershipstyleoncoachathleterelationshipathletesmotivationsandathletesatisfaction AT zhaojie effectsofleadershipstyleoncoachathleterelationshipathletesmotivationsandathletesatisfaction |