Cargando…

Effects of leadership style on coach-athlete relationship, athletes’ motivations, and athlete satisfaction

INTRODUCTION: The current study investigated the impacts of autocratic and democratic leadership styles on the coach-athlete relationship, athletes’ motivations, and athlete satisfaction. METHODS: Survey data were collected from 298 student-athletes (male = 157; 52.7%, female = 141; 47.3%) from 20 d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jin, Hao, Kim, Seungmo, Love, Adam, Jin, Yun, Zhao, Jie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9791096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36578680
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1012953
_version_ 1784859324155166720
author Jin, Hao
Kim, Seungmo
Love, Adam
Jin, Yun
Zhao, Jie
author_facet Jin, Hao
Kim, Seungmo
Love, Adam
Jin, Yun
Zhao, Jie
author_sort Jin, Hao
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The current study investigated the impacts of autocratic and democratic leadership styles on the coach-athlete relationship, athletes’ motivations, and athlete satisfaction. METHODS: Survey data were collected from 298 student-athletes (male = 157; 52.7%, female = 141; 47.3%) from 20 different Chinese collegiate sports. The Structural Equation Model was used to test the hypothesized model. RESULTS: The results indicated democratic leadership had a direct positive influence on the coach-athlete relationship, while autocratic leadership had no direct effect. Both leadership styles did not influence autonomous motivation. The coach-athlete relationship, meanwhile, had a full mediation effect between democratic leadership and athletes’ motivation and satisfaction. In addition, autonomous motivation had a partial mediation effect between the coach-athlete relationship and athlete satisfaction. DISCUSSION: Ultimately, the findings of the current study underscore the need for coaches and administrators to understand the impact of different leadership styles and highlight the importance of democratic leadership in improving athletes’ psychological outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9791096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97910962022-12-27 Effects of leadership style on coach-athlete relationship, athletes’ motivations, and athlete satisfaction Jin, Hao Kim, Seungmo Love, Adam Jin, Yun Zhao, Jie Front Psychol Psychology INTRODUCTION: The current study investigated the impacts of autocratic and democratic leadership styles on the coach-athlete relationship, athletes’ motivations, and athlete satisfaction. METHODS: Survey data were collected from 298 student-athletes (male = 157; 52.7%, female = 141; 47.3%) from 20 different Chinese collegiate sports. The Structural Equation Model was used to test the hypothesized model. RESULTS: The results indicated democratic leadership had a direct positive influence on the coach-athlete relationship, while autocratic leadership had no direct effect. Both leadership styles did not influence autonomous motivation. The coach-athlete relationship, meanwhile, had a full mediation effect between democratic leadership and athletes’ motivation and satisfaction. In addition, autonomous motivation had a partial mediation effect between the coach-athlete relationship and athlete satisfaction. DISCUSSION: Ultimately, the findings of the current study underscore the need for coaches and administrators to understand the impact of different leadership styles and highlight the importance of democratic leadership in improving athletes’ psychological outcomes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9791096/ /pubmed/36578680 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1012953 Text en Copyright © 2022 Jin, Kim, Love, Jin and Zhao. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Jin, Hao
Kim, Seungmo
Love, Adam
Jin, Yun
Zhao, Jie
Effects of leadership style on coach-athlete relationship, athletes’ motivations, and athlete satisfaction
title Effects of leadership style on coach-athlete relationship, athletes’ motivations, and athlete satisfaction
title_full Effects of leadership style on coach-athlete relationship, athletes’ motivations, and athlete satisfaction
title_fullStr Effects of leadership style on coach-athlete relationship, athletes’ motivations, and athlete satisfaction
title_full_unstemmed Effects of leadership style on coach-athlete relationship, athletes’ motivations, and athlete satisfaction
title_short Effects of leadership style on coach-athlete relationship, athletes’ motivations, and athlete satisfaction
title_sort effects of leadership style on coach-athlete relationship, athletes’ motivations, and athlete satisfaction
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9791096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36578680
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1012953
work_keys_str_mv AT jinhao effectsofleadershipstyleoncoachathleterelationshipathletesmotivationsandathletesatisfaction
AT kimseungmo effectsofleadershipstyleoncoachathleterelationshipathletesmotivationsandathletesatisfaction
AT loveadam effectsofleadershipstyleoncoachathleterelationshipathletesmotivationsandathletesatisfaction
AT jinyun effectsofleadershipstyleoncoachathleterelationshipathletesmotivationsandathletesatisfaction
AT zhaojie effectsofleadershipstyleoncoachathleterelationshipathletesmotivationsandathletesatisfaction