Cargando…

Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of a safety protocol to mitigate SARS-CoV-2 transmission risks when participating in full-capacity live mass events: a cross-sectional survey and interview-based study

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the feasibility and acceptability of a novel COVID-19 safety protocol combining professionally witnessed home-based videoed pre-event testing and a data-driven risk assessment model that was piloted at the Standon Calling Festival in July 2021. DESIGN: Observational study usin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dallera, Giulia, Alaa, Aos, El-Osta, Austen, Kreindler, Jack, Harris, Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9791109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36564106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063838
_version_ 1784859327265243136
author Dallera, Giulia
Alaa, Aos
El-Osta, Austen
Kreindler, Jack
Harris, Matthew
author_facet Dallera, Giulia
Alaa, Aos
El-Osta, Austen
Kreindler, Jack
Harris, Matthew
author_sort Dallera, Giulia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Investigate the feasibility and acceptability of a novel COVID-19 safety protocol combining professionally witnessed home-based videoed pre-event testing and a data-driven risk assessment model that was piloted at the Standon Calling Festival in July 2021. DESIGN: Observational study using a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design involving a survey, personal interviews and group discussions with a cross section of participants. SETTING: Standon Calling Festival, Hertfordshire, England. PARTICIPANTS: 4726 adults who attended Standon Calling and consented to participate in the study. RESULTS: Nearly a quarter (23.1%; 1093) attendees (women 65%, men 35%) responded to the postevent survey. Eleven participants were interviewed before thematic saturation was reached. The majority (81.0%) of respondents found the at-home testing protocol convenient and of reasonable cost (73.6%). Confidence in the test result was enhanced due to professional-supported videoing (76.2%), whereas 72.6% had confidence in the security of the data. Videoed self-testing helped 45.0% of respondents to feel more confident in their lateral flow testing technique. The majority (85.5%) felt safer at the event and 93.7% agreed that the protocol did not interfere with their enjoyment of the event. Themes generated from interviews showed that the protocol could be applied to other disease areas and events, but there were concerns that over-reliance on test results alone could lead some people to have a false sense of security around the safety of the live event. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that a protocol that combines professionally witnessed home-based videoed pre-event testing is highly acceptable and feasible, and it can inform decision making and support the safe reopening of live mass events at full capacity. Although COVID-19 is now considered endemic in the UK, this protocol can be of value for other countries where the live events industry remains heavily impacted. Risk modelling should be tested and evaluated at future events to further increase the robustness of this protocol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9791109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97911092022-12-27 Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of a safety protocol to mitigate SARS-CoV-2 transmission risks when participating in full-capacity live mass events: a cross-sectional survey and interview-based study Dallera, Giulia Alaa, Aos El-Osta, Austen Kreindler, Jack Harris, Matthew BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVE: Investigate the feasibility and acceptability of a novel COVID-19 safety protocol combining professionally witnessed home-based videoed pre-event testing and a data-driven risk assessment model that was piloted at the Standon Calling Festival in July 2021. DESIGN: Observational study using a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design involving a survey, personal interviews and group discussions with a cross section of participants. SETTING: Standon Calling Festival, Hertfordshire, England. PARTICIPANTS: 4726 adults who attended Standon Calling and consented to participate in the study. RESULTS: Nearly a quarter (23.1%; 1093) attendees (women 65%, men 35%) responded to the postevent survey. Eleven participants were interviewed before thematic saturation was reached. The majority (81.0%) of respondents found the at-home testing protocol convenient and of reasonable cost (73.6%). Confidence in the test result was enhanced due to professional-supported videoing (76.2%), whereas 72.6% had confidence in the security of the data. Videoed self-testing helped 45.0% of respondents to feel more confident in their lateral flow testing technique. The majority (85.5%) felt safer at the event and 93.7% agreed that the protocol did not interfere with their enjoyment of the event. Themes generated from interviews showed that the protocol could be applied to other disease areas and events, but there were concerns that over-reliance on test results alone could lead some people to have a false sense of security around the safety of the live event. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that a protocol that combines professionally witnessed home-based videoed pre-event testing is highly acceptable and feasible, and it can inform decision making and support the safe reopening of live mass events at full capacity. Although COVID-19 is now considered endemic in the UK, this protocol can be of value for other countries where the live events industry remains heavily impacted. Risk modelling should be tested and evaluated at future events to further increase the robustness of this protocol. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9791109/ /pubmed/36564106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063838 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Public Health
Dallera, Giulia
Alaa, Aos
El-Osta, Austen
Kreindler, Jack
Harris, Matthew
Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of a safety protocol to mitigate SARS-CoV-2 transmission risks when participating in full-capacity live mass events: a cross-sectional survey and interview-based study
title Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of a safety protocol to mitigate SARS-CoV-2 transmission risks when participating in full-capacity live mass events: a cross-sectional survey and interview-based study
title_full Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of a safety protocol to mitigate SARS-CoV-2 transmission risks when participating in full-capacity live mass events: a cross-sectional survey and interview-based study
title_fullStr Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of a safety protocol to mitigate SARS-CoV-2 transmission risks when participating in full-capacity live mass events: a cross-sectional survey and interview-based study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of a safety protocol to mitigate SARS-CoV-2 transmission risks when participating in full-capacity live mass events: a cross-sectional survey and interview-based study
title_short Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of a safety protocol to mitigate SARS-CoV-2 transmission risks when participating in full-capacity live mass events: a cross-sectional survey and interview-based study
title_sort evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of a safety protocol to mitigate sars-cov-2 transmission risks when participating in full-capacity live mass events: a cross-sectional survey and interview-based study
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9791109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36564106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063838
work_keys_str_mv AT dalleragiulia evaluatingthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofasafetyprotocoltomitigatesarscov2transmissionriskswhenparticipatinginfullcapacitylivemasseventsacrosssectionalsurveyandinterviewbasedstudy
AT alaaaos evaluatingthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofasafetyprotocoltomitigatesarscov2transmissionriskswhenparticipatinginfullcapacitylivemasseventsacrosssectionalsurveyandinterviewbasedstudy
AT elostaausten evaluatingthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofasafetyprotocoltomitigatesarscov2transmissionriskswhenparticipatinginfullcapacitylivemasseventsacrosssectionalsurveyandinterviewbasedstudy
AT kreindlerjack evaluatingthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofasafetyprotocoltomitigatesarscov2transmissionriskswhenparticipatinginfullcapacitylivemasseventsacrosssectionalsurveyandinterviewbasedstudy
AT harrismatthew evaluatingthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofasafetyprotocoltomitigatesarscov2transmissionriskswhenparticipatinginfullcapacitylivemasseventsacrosssectionalsurveyandinterviewbasedstudy