Cargando…
_version_ 1784859341421019136
author Scheiner, Bernhard
Roessler, Daniel
Phen, Samuel
Lim, Mir
Pomej, Katharina
Pressiani, Tiziana
Cammarota, Antonella
Fründt, Thorben W.
von Felden, Johann
Schulze, Kornelius
Himmelsbach, Vera
Finkelmeier, Fabian
Deibel, Ansgar
Siebenhüner, Alexander R.
Shmanko, Kateryna
Radu, Pompilia
Schwacha-Eipper, Birgit
Ebert, Matthias P.
Teufel, Andreas
Djanani, Angela
Hucke, Florian
Balcar, Lorenz
Philipp, Alexander B.
Hsiehchen, David
Venerito, Marino
Sinner, Friedrich
Trauner, Michael
D'Alessio, Antonio
Fulgenzi, Claudia A.M.
Pinato, David J.
Peck-Radosavljevic, Markus
Dufour, Jean-François
Weinmann, Arndt
Kremer, Andreas E.
Singal, Amit G.
De Toni, Enrico N.
Rimassa, Lorenza
Pinter, Matthias
author_facet Scheiner, Bernhard
Roessler, Daniel
Phen, Samuel
Lim, Mir
Pomej, Katharina
Pressiani, Tiziana
Cammarota, Antonella
Fründt, Thorben W.
von Felden, Johann
Schulze, Kornelius
Himmelsbach, Vera
Finkelmeier, Fabian
Deibel, Ansgar
Siebenhüner, Alexander R.
Shmanko, Kateryna
Radu, Pompilia
Schwacha-Eipper, Birgit
Ebert, Matthias P.
Teufel, Andreas
Djanani, Angela
Hucke, Florian
Balcar, Lorenz
Philipp, Alexander B.
Hsiehchen, David
Venerito, Marino
Sinner, Friedrich
Trauner, Michael
D'Alessio, Antonio
Fulgenzi, Claudia A.M.
Pinato, David J.
Peck-Radosavljevic, Markus
Dufour, Jean-François
Weinmann, Arndt
Kremer, Andreas E.
Singal, Amit G.
De Toni, Enrico N.
Rimassa, Lorenza
Pinter, Matthias
author_sort Scheiner, Bernhard
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND & AIMS: We investigated the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who received ICI-based therapies in a previous systemic line. METHODS: In this international, retrospective multicenter study, patients with HCC who received at least two lines of ICI-based therapies (ICI-1, ICI-2) at 14 institutions were eligible. The main outcomes included best overall response and treatment-related adverse events. RESULTS: Of 994 ICI-treated patients screened, a total of 58 patients (male, n = 41; 71%) with a mean age of 65.0±9.0 years were included. Median systemic treatment lines of ICI-1 and ICI-2 were 1 (range, 1-4) and 3 (range, 2-9), respectively. ICI-based therapies used at ICI-1 and ICI-2 included ICI alone (ICI-1, n = 26, 45%; ICI-2, n = 4, 7%), dual ICI regimens (n = 1, 2%; n = 12, 21%), or ICI combined with targeted therapies/anti-VEGF (n = 31, 53%; n = 42, 72%). Most patients discontinued ICI-1 due to progression (n = 52, 90%). Objective response rate was 22% at ICI-1 and 26% at ICI-2. Responses at ICI-2 were also seen in patients who had progressive disease as best overall response at ICI-1 (n = 11/21; 52%). Median time-to-progression at ICI-1 and ICI-2 was 5.4 (95% CI 3.0-7.7) months and 5.2 (95% CI 3.3-7.0) months, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3-4 at ICI-1 and ICI-2 were observed in 9 (16%) and 10 (17%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ICI rechallenge was safe and resulted in a treatment benefit in a meaningful proportion of patients with HCC. These data provide a rationale for investigating ICI-based regimens in patients who progressed on first-line immunotherapy in prospective trials. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: Therapeutic sequencing after first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a challenge as no available second-line treatment options have been studied in immunotherapy-pretreated patients. Particularly, the role of ICI rechallenge in patients with HCC is unclear, as data from prospective trials are lacking. We investigated the efficacy and safety of ICI-based regimens in patients with HCC pretreated with immunotherapy in a retrospective, international, multicenter study. Our data provide the rationale for prospective trials investigating the role of ICI-based regimens in patients who have progressed on first-line immunotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9791167
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97911672022-12-27 Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in individuals with hepatocellular carcinoma Scheiner, Bernhard Roessler, Daniel Phen, Samuel Lim, Mir Pomej, Katharina Pressiani, Tiziana Cammarota, Antonella Fründt, Thorben W. von Felden, Johann Schulze, Kornelius Himmelsbach, Vera Finkelmeier, Fabian Deibel, Ansgar Siebenhüner, Alexander R. Shmanko, Kateryna Radu, Pompilia Schwacha-Eipper, Birgit Ebert, Matthias P. Teufel, Andreas Djanani, Angela Hucke, Florian Balcar, Lorenz Philipp, Alexander B. Hsiehchen, David Venerito, Marino Sinner, Friedrich Trauner, Michael D'Alessio, Antonio Fulgenzi, Claudia A.M. Pinato, David J. Peck-Radosavljevic, Markus Dufour, Jean-François Weinmann, Arndt Kremer, Andreas E. Singal, Amit G. De Toni, Enrico N. Rimassa, Lorenza Pinter, Matthias JHEP Rep Research Article BACKGROUND & AIMS: We investigated the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who received ICI-based therapies in a previous systemic line. METHODS: In this international, retrospective multicenter study, patients with HCC who received at least two lines of ICI-based therapies (ICI-1, ICI-2) at 14 institutions were eligible. The main outcomes included best overall response and treatment-related adverse events. RESULTS: Of 994 ICI-treated patients screened, a total of 58 patients (male, n = 41; 71%) with a mean age of 65.0±9.0 years were included. Median systemic treatment lines of ICI-1 and ICI-2 were 1 (range, 1-4) and 3 (range, 2-9), respectively. ICI-based therapies used at ICI-1 and ICI-2 included ICI alone (ICI-1, n = 26, 45%; ICI-2, n = 4, 7%), dual ICI regimens (n = 1, 2%; n = 12, 21%), or ICI combined with targeted therapies/anti-VEGF (n = 31, 53%; n = 42, 72%). Most patients discontinued ICI-1 due to progression (n = 52, 90%). Objective response rate was 22% at ICI-1 and 26% at ICI-2. Responses at ICI-2 were also seen in patients who had progressive disease as best overall response at ICI-1 (n = 11/21; 52%). Median time-to-progression at ICI-1 and ICI-2 was 5.4 (95% CI 3.0-7.7) months and 5.2 (95% CI 3.3-7.0) months, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3-4 at ICI-1 and ICI-2 were observed in 9 (16%) and 10 (17%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ICI rechallenge was safe and resulted in a treatment benefit in a meaningful proportion of patients with HCC. These data provide a rationale for investigating ICI-based regimens in patients who progressed on first-line immunotherapy in prospective trials. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: Therapeutic sequencing after first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a challenge as no available second-line treatment options have been studied in immunotherapy-pretreated patients. Particularly, the role of ICI rechallenge in patients with HCC is unclear, as data from prospective trials are lacking. We investigated the efficacy and safety of ICI-based regimens in patients with HCC pretreated with immunotherapy in a retrospective, international, multicenter study. Our data provide the rationale for prospective trials investigating the role of ICI-based regimens in patients who have progressed on first-line immunotherapy. Elsevier 2022-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9791167/ /pubmed/36578451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2022.100620 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Scheiner, Bernhard
Roessler, Daniel
Phen, Samuel
Lim, Mir
Pomej, Katharina
Pressiani, Tiziana
Cammarota, Antonella
Fründt, Thorben W.
von Felden, Johann
Schulze, Kornelius
Himmelsbach, Vera
Finkelmeier, Fabian
Deibel, Ansgar
Siebenhüner, Alexander R.
Shmanko, Kateryna
Radu, Pompilia
Schwacha-Eipper, Birgit
Ebert, Matthias P.
Teufel, Andreas
Djanani, Angela
Hucke, Florian
Balcar, Lorenz
Philipp, Alexander B.
Hsiehchen, David
Venerito, Marino
Sinner, Friedrich
Trauner, Michael
D'Alessio, Antonio
Fulgenzi, Claudia A.M.
Pinato, David J.
Peck-Radosavljevic, Markus
Dufour, Jean-François
Weinmann, Arndt
Kremer, Andreas E.
Singal, Amit G.
De Toni, Enrico N.
Rimassa, Lorenza
Pinter, Matthias
Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in individuals with hepatocellular carcinoma
title Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in individuals with hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in individuals with hepatocellular carcinoma
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in individuals with hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in individuals with hepatocellular carcinoma
title_short Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in individuals with hepatocellular carcinoma
title_sort efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in individuals with hepatocellular carcinoma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9791167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36578451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2022.100620
work_keys_str_mv AT scheinerbernhard efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT roesslerdaniel efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT phensamuel efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT limmir efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT pomejkatharina efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT pressianitiziana efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT cammarotaantonella efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT frundtthorbenw efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT vonfeldenjohann efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT schulzekornelius efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT himmelsbachvera efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT finkelmeierfabian efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT deibelansgar efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT siebenhuneralexanderr efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT shmankokateryna efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT radupompilia efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT schwachaeipperbirgit efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT ebertmatthiasp efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT teufelandreas efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT djananiangela efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT huckeflorian efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT balcarlorenz efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT philippalexanderb efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT hsiehchendavid efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT veneritomarino efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT sinnerfriedrich efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT traunermichael efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT dalessioantonio efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT fulgenziclaudiaam efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT pinatodavidj efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT peckradosavljevicmarkus efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT dufourjeanfrancois efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT weinmannarndt efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT kremerandrease efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT singalamitg efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT detonienricon efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT rimassalorenza efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT pintermatthias efficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrechallengeinindividualswithhepatocellularcarcinoma