Cargando…

Comparison of chorion allograft and subepithelial connective tissue autograft in the treatment of gingival recession- A randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND: To compare the clinical outcomes of subepithelial connective tissue graft and chorion membrane along with coronally advanced flap in the treatment of gingival recession. METHODS: A total of 12 patients with 24 sites showing isolated bilateral Miller's class I and II gingival recessi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maity, Snigdha, Priyadharshini, Vidya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9791374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36578557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.12.002
_version_ 1784859392241303552
author Maity, Snigdha
Priyadharshini, Vidya
author_facet Maity, Snigdha
Priyadharshini, Vidya
author_sort Maity, Snigdha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the clinical outcomes of subepithelial connective tissue graft and chorion membrane along with coronally advanced flap in the treatment of gingival recession. METHODS: A total of 12 patients with 24 sites showing isolated bilateral Miller's class I and II gingival recessions were randomly allocated into two treatment sites. One site, connective tissue graft, (n = 12 sites) while on the contra-lateral site, chorion membrane (n = 12 sites) was used with coronally advanced flap. Clinical parameters: probing depth, recession depth, recession width, width of keratinized gingiva, relative attachment level, thickness of keratinized gingiva were recorded at the baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. The amount of root coverage was evaluated after 6 months. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were observed between test and control sites in terms of recession depth, recession width, width of keratinized gingiva and thickness of keratinized gingiva at 6 months. The test sites presented 66.17 ± 18.85% and the control site showed 87.17 ± 18.33% of root coverage at 6 months. CONCLUSION: Very limited amount of recession coverage with chorion membrane and did not serve as an alternative to connective tissue graft. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI/2017/12/010964.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9791374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97913742022-12-27 Comparison of chorion allograft and subepithelial connective tissue autograft in the treatment of gingival recession- A randomized controlled clinical trial Maity, Snigdha Priyadharshini, Vidya J Oral Biol Craniofac Res Article BACKGROUND: To compare the clinical outcomes of subepithelial connective tissue graft and chorion membrane along with coronally advanced flap in the treatment of gingival recession. METHODS: A total of 12 patients with 24 sites showing isolated bilateral Miller's class I and II gingival recessions were randomly allocated into two treatment sites. One site, connective tissue graft, (n = 12 sites) while on the contra-lateral site, chorion membrane (n = 12 sites) was used with coronally advanced flap. Clinical parameters: probing depth, recession depth, recession width, width of keratinized gingiva, relative attachment level, thickness of keratinized gingiva were recorded at the baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. The amount of root coverage was evaluated after 6 months. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were observed between test and control sites in terms of recession depth, recession width, width of keratinized gingiva and thickness of keratinized gingiva at 6 months. The test sites presented 66.17 ± 18.85% and the control site showed 87.17 ± 18.33% of root coverage at 6 months. CONCLUSION: Very limited amount of recession coverage with chorion membrane and did not serve as an alternative to connective tissue graft. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI/2017/12/010964. Elsevier 2023 2022-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9791374/ /pubmed/36578557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.12.002 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Maity, Snigdha
Priyadharshini, Vidya
Comparison of chorion allograft and subepithelial connective tissue autograft in the treatment of gingival recession- A randomized controlled clinical trial
title Comparison of chorion allograft and subepithelial connective tissue autograft in the treatment of gingival recession- A randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full Comparison of chorion allograft and subepithelial connective tissue autograft in the treatment of gingival recession- A randomized controlled clinical trial
title_fullStr Comparison of chorion allograft and subepithelial connective tissue autograft in the treatment of gingival recession- A randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of chorion allograft and subepithelial connective tissue autograft in the treatment of gingival recession- A randomized controlled clinical trial
title_short Comparison of chorion allograft and subepithelial connective tissue autograft in the treatment of gingival recession- A randomized controlled clinical trial
title_sort comparison of chorion allograft and subepithelial connective tissue autograft in the treatment of gingival recession- a randomized controlled clinical trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9791374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36578557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.12.002
work_keys_str_mv AT maitysnigdha comparisonofchorionallograftandsubepithelialconnectivetissueautograftinthetreatmentofgingivalrecessionarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT priyadharshinividya comparisonofchorionallograftandsubepithelialconnectivetissueautograftinthetreatmentofgingivalrecessionarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial