Cargando…

How the Esther Network model for coproduction of person-centred health and social care was adopted and adapted in Singapore: a realist evaluation

OBJECTIVES: The Esther Network (EN) model, a person-centred care innovation in Sweden, was adopted in Singapore to promote person-centredness and improve integration between health and social care practitioners. This realist evaluation aimed to explain its adoption and adaptation in Singapore. DESIG...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lim, Esther Li Ping, Khee, Giat Yeng, Thor, Johan, Andersson Gäre, Boel, Thumboo, Julian, Allgurin, Monika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9791430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36564117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059794
_version_ 1784859405673562112
author Lim, Esther Li Ping
Khee, Giat Yeng
Thor, Johan
Andersson Gäre, Boel
Thumboo, Julian
Allgurin, Monika
author_facet Lim, Esther Li Ping
Khee, Giat Yeng
Thor, Johan
Andersson Gäre, Boel
Thumboo, Julian
Allgurin, Monika
author_sort Lim, Esther Li Ping
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The Esther Network (EN) model, a person-centred care innovation in Sweden, was adopted in Singapore to promote person-centredness and improve integration between health and social care practitioners. This realist evaluation aimed to explain its adoption and adaptation in Singapore. DESIGN: An organisational case study using a realist evaluation approach drawing on Greenhalgh et al (2004)’s Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organisations to guide data collection and analysis. Data collection included interviews with seven individuals and three focus groups (including stakeholders from the macrosystem, mesosystem and microsystem levels) about their experiences of EN in Singapore, and field notes from participant observations of EN activities. SETTING: SingHealth, a healthcare cluster serving a population of 1.37 million residents in Eastern Singapore. PARTICIPANTS: Policy makers (n=4), EN programme implementers (n=3), practitioners (n=6) and service users (n=7) participated in individual interviews or focus group discussions. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome data from healthcare institutions (n=13) and community agencies (n=59) were included in document analysis. RESULTS: Singapore’s ageing population and need to transition from a hospital-based model to a more sustainable community-based model provided an opportunity for change. The personalised nature and logic of the EN model resonated with leaders and led to collective adoption. Embedded cultural influences such as the need for order and hierarchical structures were both barriers to, and facilitators of, change. Coproduction between service users and practitioners in making care improvements deepened the relationships and commitments that held the network together. CONCLUSIONS: The enabling role of leaders (macrosystem level), the bridging role of practitioners (mesosystem level) and the unifying role of service users (microsystem level) all contributed to EN’s success in Singapore. Understanding these roles helps us understand how staff at various levels can contribute to the adoption and adaptation of EN and similar complex innovations systemwide.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9791430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97914302022-12-27 How the Esther Network model for coproduction of person-centred health and social care was adopted and adapted in Singapore: a realist evaluation Lim, Esther Li Ping Khee, Giat Yeng Thor, Johan Andersson Gäre, Boel Thumboo, Julian Allgurin, Monika BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: The Esther Network (EN) model, a person-centred care innovation in Sweden, was adopted in Singapore to promote person-centredness and improve integration between health and social care practitioners. This realist evaluation aimed to explain its adoption and adaptation in Singapore. DESIGN: An organisational case study using a realist evaluation approach drawing on Greenhalgh et al (2004)’s Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organisations to guide data collection and analysis. Data collection included interviews with seven individuals and three focus groups (including stakeholders from the macrosystem, mesosystem and microsystem levels) about their experiences of EN in Singapore, and field notes from participant observations of EN activities. SETTING: SingHealth, a healthcare cluster serving a population of 1.37 million residents in Eastern Singapore. PARTICIPANTS: Policy makers (n=4), EN programme implementers (n=3), practitioners (n=6) and service users (n=7) participated in individual interviews or focus group discussions. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome data from healthcare institutions (n=13) and community agencies (n=59) were included in document analysis. RESULTS: Singapore’s ageing population and need to transition from a hospital-based model to a more sustainable community-based model provided an opportunity for change. The personalised nature and logic of the EN model resonated with leaders and led to collective adoption. Embedded cultural influences such as the need for order and hierarchical structures were both barriers to, and facilitators of, change. Coproduction between service users and practitioners in making care improvements deepened the relationships and commitments that held the network together. CONCLUSIONS: The enabling role of leaders (macrosystem level), the bridging role of practitioners (mesosystem level) and the unifying role of service users (microsystem level) all contributed to EN’s success in Singapore. Understanding these roles helps us understand how staff at various levels can contribute to the adoption and adaptation of EN and similar complex innovations systemwide. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9791430/ /pubmed/36564117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059794 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Lim, Esther Li Ping
Khee, Giat Yeng
Thor, Johan
Andersson Gäre, Boel
Thumboo, Julian
Allgurin, Monika
How the Esther Network model for coproduction of person-centred health and social care was adopted and adapted in Singapore: a realist evaluation
title How the Esther Network model for coproduction of person-centred health and social care was adopted and adapted in Singapore: a realist evaluation
title_full How the Esther Network model for coproduction of person-centred health and social care was adopted and adapted in Singapore: a realist evaluation
title_fullStr How the Esther Network model for coproduction of person-centred health and social care was adopted and adapted in Singapore: a realist evaluation
title_full_unstemmed How the Esther Network model for coproduction of person-centred health and social care was adopted and adapted in Singapore: a realist evaluation
title_short How the Esther Network model for coproduction of person-centred health and social care was adopted and adapted in Singapore: a realist evaluation
title_sort how the esther network model for coproduction of person-centred health and social care was adopted and adapted in singapore: a realist evaluation
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9791430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36564117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059794
work_keys_str_mv AT limestherliping howtheesthernetworkmodelforcoproductionofpersoncentredhealthandsocialcarewasadoptedandadaptedinsingaporearealistevaluation
AT kheegiatyeng howtheesthernetworkmodelforcoproductionofpersoncentredhealthandsocialcarewasadoptedandadaptedinsingaporearealistevaluation
AT thorjohan howtheesthernetworkmodelforcoproductionofpersoncentredhealthandsocialcarewasadoptedandadaptedinsingaporearealistevaluation
AT anderssongareboel howtheesthernetworkmodelforcoproductionofpersoncentredhealthandsocialcarewasadoptedandadaptedinsingaporearealistevaluation
AT thumboojulian howtheesthernetworkmodelforcoproductionofpersoncentredhealthandsocialcarewasadoptedandadaptedinsingaporearealistevaluation
AT allgurinmonika howtheesthernetworkmodelforcoproductionofpersoncentredhealthandsocialcarewasadoptedandadaptedinsingaporearealistevaluation