Cargando…
Social semantics: the organization and grounding of abstract concepts
Abstract concepts, like justice and friendship, are central features of our daily lives. Traditionally, abstract concepts are distinguished from other concepts in that they cannot be directly experienced through the senses. As such, they pose a challenge for strongly embodied models of semantic repr...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9791475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36571120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0363 |
_version_ | 1784859414520397824 |
---|---|
author | Pexman, Penny M. Diveica, Veronica Binney, Richard J. |
author_facet | Pexman, Penny M. Diveica, Veronica Binney, Richard J. |
author_sort | Pexman, Penny M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Abstract concepts, like justice and friendship, are central features of our daily lives. Traditionally, abstract concepts are distinguished from other concepts in that they cannot be directly experienced through the senses. As such, they pose a challenge for strongly embodied models of semantic representation that assume a central role for sensorimotor information. There is growing recognition, however, that it is possible for meaning to be ‘grounded’ via cognitive systems, including those involved in processing language and emotion. In this article, we focus on the specific proposal that social significance is a key feature in the representation of some concepts. We begin by reviewing recent evidence in favour of this proposal from the fields of psycholinguistics and neuroimaging. We then discuss the limited extent to which there is consensus about the definition of ‘socialness’ and propose essential next steps for research in this domain. Taking one such step, we describe preliminary data from an unprecedented large-scale rating study that can help determine how socialness is distinct from other facets of word meaning. We provide a backdrop of contemporary theories regarding semantic representation and social cognition and highlight important predictions for both brain and behaviour. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Concepts in interaction: social engagement and inner experiences’. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9791475 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97914752022-12-29 Social semantics: the organization and grounding of abstract concepts Pexman, Penny M. Diveica, Veronica Binney, Richard J. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Articles Abstract concepts, like justice and friendship, are central features of our daily lives. Traditionally, abstract concepts are distinguished from other concepts in that they cannot be directly experienced through the senses. As such, they pose a challenge for strongly embodied models of semantic representation that assume a central role for sensorimotor information. There is growing recognition, however, that it is possible for meaning to be ‘grounded’ via cognitive systems, including those involved in processing language and emotion. In this article, we focus on the specific proposal that social significance is a key feature in the representation of some concepts. We begin by reviewing recent evidence in favour of this proposal from the fields of psycholinguistics and neuroimaging. We then discuss the limited extent to which there is consensus about the definition of ‘socialness’ and propose essential next steps for research in this domain. Taking one such step, we describe preliminary data from an unprecedented large-scale rating study that can help determine how socialness is distinct from other facets of word meaning. We provide a backdrop of contemporary theories regarding semantic representation and social cognition and highlight important predictions for both brain and behaviour. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Concepts in interaction: social engagement and inner experiences’. The Royal Society 2023-02-13 2022-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9791475/ /pubmed/36571120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0363 Text en © 2022 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Pexman, Penny M. Diveica, Veronica Binney, Richard J. Social semantics: the organization and grounding of abstract concepts |
title | Social semantics: the organization and grounding of abstract concepts |
title_full | Social semantics: the organization and grounding of abstract concepts |
title_fullStr | Social semantics: the organization and grounding of abstract concepts |
title_full_unstemmed | Social semantics: the organization and grounding of abstract concepts |
title_short | Social semantics: the organization and grounding of abstract concepts |
title_sort | social semantics: the organization and grounding of abstract concepts |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9791475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36571120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0363 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pexmanpennym socialsemanticstheorganizationandgroundingofabstractconcepts AT diveicaveronica socialsemanticstheorganizationandgroundingofabstractconcepts AT binneyrichardj socialsemanticstheorganizationandgroundingofabstractconcepts |