Cargando…
Sovereignty in the Digital and Contact Tracing Apps
Recently, the concept of sovereignty in the digital has attracted much attention. Several publications dealing with this concept assume that it can best be described as a network of different, overlapping exercises of power. Nevertheless, there is a need for further research on how exactly sovereign...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9791621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36590274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s44206-022-00030-2 |
_version_ | 1784859448518377472 |
---|---|
author | Tretter, Max |
author_facet | Tretter, Max |
author_sort | Tretter, Max |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recently, the concept of sovereignty in the digital has attracted much attention. Several publications dealing with this concept assume that it can best be described as a network of different, overlapping exercises of power. Nevertheless, there is a need for further research on how exactly sovereignty in the digital can be understood. In order to contribute to a better understanding of this concept, I illustrate its complex structure using contact tracing apps as a paradigmatic example. I conduct a narrative review to show what sovereignty looks like in the context of these apps. In the context of digital contact tracing apps, sovereignty is best understood as a complex network of three actors—nations, (big tech) companies, and individuals—that exercise various forms of power against or on behalf of each other to claim sovereignty for themselves and to either weaken or strengthen the sovereignty claims of other actors. Since large parts of the results can be generalized from the particular context of contact tracing apps, they contribute to a better overall understanding of the concept of sovereignty in digital. This might, in turn, be helpful for discussions about this technology as well as about the regulation and governance of the digital in general. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9791621 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97916212022-12-27 Sovereignty in the Digital and Contact Tracing Apps Tretter, Max Digit Soc Original Paper Recently, the concept of sovereignty in the digital has attracted much attention. Several publications dealing with this concept assume that it can best be described as a network of different, overlapping exercises of power. Nevertheless, there is a need for further research on how exactly sovereignty in the digital can be understood. In order to contribute to a better understanding of this concept, I illustrate its complex structure using contact tracing apps as a paradigmatic example. I conduct a narrative review to show what sovereignty looks like in the context of these apps. In the context of digital contact tracing apps, sovereignty is best understood as a complex network of three actors—nations, (big tech) companies, and individuals—that exercise various forms of power against or on behalf of each other to claim sovereignty for themselves and to either weaken or strengthen the sovereignty claims of other actors. Since large parts of the results can be generalized from the particular context of contact tracing apps, they contribute to a better overall understanding of the concept of sovereignty in digital. This might, in turn, be helpful for discussions about this technology as well as about the regulation and governance of the digital in general. Springer International Publishing 2022-12-26 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9791621/ /pubmed/36590274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s44206-022-00030-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Tretter, Max Sovereignty in the Digital and Contact Tracing Apps |
title | Sovereignty in the Digital and Contact Tracing Apps |
title_full | Sovereignty in the Digital and Contact Tracing Apps |
title_fullStr | Sovereignty in the Digital and Contact Tracing Apps |
title_full_unstemmed | Sovereignty in the Digital and Contact Tracing Apps |
title_short | Sovereignty in the Digital and Contact Tracing Apps |
title_sort | sovereignty in the digital and contact tracing apps |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9791621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36590274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s44206-022-00030-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT trettermax sovereigntyinthedigitalandcontacttracingapps |