Cargando…

Sovereignty in the Digital and Contact Tracing Apps

Recently, the concept of sovereignty in the digital has attracted much attention. Several publications dealing with this concept assume that it can best be described as a network of different, overlapping exercises of power. Nevertheless, there is a need for further research on how exactly sovereign...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Tretter, Max
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9791621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36590274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s44206-022-00030-2
_version_ 1784859448518377472
author Tretter, Max
author_facet Tretter, Max
author_sort Tretter, Max
collection PubMed
description Recently, the concept of sovereignty in the digital has attracted much attention. Several publications dealing with this concept assume that it can best be described as a network of different, overlapping exercises of power. Nevertheless, there is a need for further research on how exactly sovereignty in the digital can be understood. In order to contribute to a better understanding of this concept, I illustrate its complex structure using contact tracing apps as a paradigmatic example. I conduct a narrative review to show what sovereignty looks like in the context of these apps. In the context of digital contact tracing apps, sovereignty is best understood as a complex network of three actors—nations, (big tech) companies, and individuals—that exercise various forms of power against or on behalf of each other to claim sovereignty for themselves and to either weaken or strengthen the sovereignty claims of other actors. Since large parts of the results can be generalized from the particular context of contact tracing apps, they contribute to a better overall understanding of the concept of sovereignty in digital. This might, in turn, be helpful for discussions about this technology as well as about the regulation and governance of the digital in general.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9791621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97916212022-12-27 Sovereignty in the Digital and Contact Tracing Apps Tretter, Max Digit Soc Original Paper Recently, the concept of sovereignty in the digital has attracted much attention. Several publications dealing with this concept assume that it can best be described as a network of different, overlapping exercises of power. Nevertheless, there is a need for further research on how exactly sovereignty in the digital can be understood. In order to contribute to a better understanding of this concept, I illustrate its complex structure using contact tracing apps as a paradigmatic example. I conduct a narrative review to show what sovereignty looks like in the context of these apps. In the context of digital contact tracing apps, sovereignty is best understood as a complex network of three actors—nations, (big tech) companies, and individuals—that exercise various forms of power against or on behalf of each other to claim sovereignty for themselves and to either weaken or strengthen the sovereignty claims of other actors. Since large parts of the results can be generalized from the particular context of contact tracing apps, they contribute to a better overall understanding of the concept of sovereignty in digital. This might, in turn, be helpful for discussions about this technology as well as about the regulation and governance of the digital in general. Springer International Publishing 2022-12-26 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9791621/ /pubmed/36590274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s44206-022-00030-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Tretter, Max
Sovereignty in the Digital and Contact Tracing Apps
title Sovereignty in the Digital and Contact Tracing Apps
title_full Sovereignty in the Digital and Contact Tracing Apps
title_fullStr Sovereignty in the Digital and Contact Tracing Apps
title_full_unstemmed Sovereignty in the Digital and Contact Tracing Apps
title_short Sovereignty in the Digital and Contact Tracing Apps
title_sort sovereignty in the digital and contact tracing apps
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9791621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36590274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s44206-022-00030-2
work_keys_str_mv AT trettermax sovereigntyinthedigitalandcontacttracingapps