Cargando…

Lack of sex-related analysis and reporting in Cochrane Reviews: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Sex-specific analysis and reporting may allow a better understanding of intervention effects and can support the decision-making process. Well-conducted systematic reviews (SRs), like those carried out by the Cochrane Collaboration, provide clinical responses transparently and stress gap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Antequera, Alba, Cuadrado-Conde, M. Ana, Roy-Vallejo, Emilia, Montoya-Martínez, María, León-García, Montserrat, Madrid-Pascual, Olaya, Calderón-Larrañaga, Sara
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2022
Materias:	Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9791738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36572932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01867-3

Ejemplares similares

Sex/gender reporting and analysis in Campbell and Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional methods study
por: Petkovic, Jennifer, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Sex as a prognostic factor for mortality in critically ill adults with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Antequera, Alba, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Evaluation of the role of sex as a prognostic factor in critically ill adults with sepsis: systematic review protocol
por: Lopez-Alcalde, Jesus, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Alexander Cochran
Publicado: (1924)

Cochrane Pflegeforum
por: Legenstein, Karin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cochrane Pflegeforum
por: Djukic, Dejan, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cochrane Cameroon: bringing Cochrane to francophone sub-Saharan Africa
por: Mbuagbaw, Lawrence, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Obesity and neuroinflammatory phenotype in mice lacking endothelial megalin
por: Bartolome, Fernando, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

James Duncan Cochran
Publicado: (1916)

William Cochrane Murray
Publicado: (1922)

Cochrane Corners in JMNI
por: Lyritis, George P., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Cochrane Interactive Learning
por: Ghezzi-Kopel, Kate
Publicado: (2018)

Dr. Jerome Cochran
Publicado: (1896)

Dr. Frank T. Cochran
Publicado: (1912)

De Graffe and Cochrane
Publicado: (1875)

Dealing with substantial heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews. Cross-sectional study
por: Schroll, Jeppe B, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Searching for unpublished data for Cochrane reviews: cross sectional study
por: Schroll, Jeppe Bennekou, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Meta-analysis and The Cochrane Collaboration: 20 years of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group
por: McKenzie, Joanne E, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Statistical Multiplicity in Systematic Reviews of Anaesthesia Interventions: A Quantification and Comparison between Cochrane and Non-Cochrane Reviews
por: Imberger, Georgina, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Reporting of drug trial funding sources and author financial conflicts of interest in Cochrane and non-Cochrane meta-analyses: a cross-sectional study
por: Turner, Kimberly, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Evaluation of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials: overview of published comments and analysis of user practice in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews
por: Jørgensen, Lars, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Captain Hugh Cochrane Storrie
Publicado: (1915)

Quo Vadis, Cochrane Collaboration?
por: Jokstad, Asbjorn
Publicado: (2019)

Dr. Samuel R. Cochrane
Publicado: (1902)

Dr. Royal E. Cochrane
Publicado: (1910)

Death of Dr. Jerome Cochran
Publicado: (1896)

A Conversation with Stephen Cochrane
por: Kamadi, Geoffrey
Publicado: (2023)

The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
por: Turner, Lucy, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Moral entrepreneurship, the power‐knowledge nexus, and the Cochrane “crisis”
por: Greenhalgh, Trisha, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Assessing the magnitude of changes from protocol to publication—a survey on Cochrane and non-Cochrane Systematic Reviews
por: Siebert, Maximilian, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Most Cochrane systematic reviews and protocols did not adhere to the Cochrane's risk of bias 2.0 tool
por: Martimbianco, Ana Luiza Cabrera, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Scope and quality of Cochrane reviews of nutrition interventions: a cross-sectional study
por: Naude, Celeste E., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Outcome reporting bias in Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis
por: Shah, Kieran, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Achievements of the Cochrane Iran Associate Centre: Lessons Learned
por: Mesgarpour, Bita, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Sex based subgroup differences in randomized controlled trials: empirical evidence from Cochrane meta-analyses
por: Wallach, Joshua D, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Consideration of sex and gender in Cochrane reviews of interventions for preventing healthcare-associated infections: a methodology study
por: López-Alcalde, Jesús, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews
por: Leeflang, Mariska MG, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

FIRST BH COCHRANE SYMPOSIUM HELD
por: Mahmic-Kaknjo, Mersiha, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Cochrane: the unfinished symphony of research synthesis
por: Roberts, Ian, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Cochrane corner: beta-blockers for hypertension
por: Wiysonge, Charles S, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_e6ak6qja594835ti2l6u96fru3