Cargando…

Landmarks Used in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Have Variable Topography

PURPOSE: To describe the morphology of the adductor tubercle (AT), medial epicondyle (ME), and gastrocnemius tubercle (GT); to quantify their relationships to the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) footprint location; and to classify the reliability of each landmark based on measurement variabili...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dandu, Navya, Trasolini, Nicholas A., Hevesi, Mario, Zavras, Athan G., Elias, Tristan J., Haneberg, Erik C., Yanke, Adam B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9791883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36579037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2022.09.003
_version_ 1784859513619218432
author Dandu, Navya
Trasolini, Nicholas A.
Hevesi, Mario
Zavras, Athan G.
Elias, Tristan J.
Haneberg, Erik C.
Yanke, Adam B.
author_facet Dandu, Navya
Trasolini, Nicholas A.
Hevesi, Mario
Zavras, Athan G.
Elias, Tristan J.
Haneberg, Erik C.
Yanke, Adam B.
author_sort Dandu, Navya
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To describe the morphology of the adductor tubercle (AT), medial epicondyle (ME), and gastrocnemius tubercle (GT); to quantify their relationships to the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) footprint location; and to classify the reliability of each landmark based on measurement variability METHODS: Eight cadaveric specimens were dissected to expose the following landmarks on the femur: MPFL footprint, AT, ME, and GT. Using the MicroScribe 3D digitizer, each landmark was projected into a 3-dimensional coordinate system and reconstructed into a complex, closed polygon. For each specimen tubercle, the base surface area, volume, height, base:height ratio, sulcus point, and distance from the MPFL footprint center were calculated. Levene’s test was performed to evaluate differences in variance of the morphologic parameters between the three osseous structures. RESULTS: The ME had significantly greater variance in volume than the GT (P = .032), and the AT (17.5 ± 3.9) and GT (19.5 ± 3.6) were significantly less variable in base:height ratio than the ME (95.3 ± 19.2; P < .001). The GT was the closest to the MPFL footprint center (7.1 ± 3.1 mm) compared with the AT (13.4 ± 3.6 mm, P = .002) and ME (13.2 ± 2.7 mm, P = .003). However, the tubercles were equally variable in terms of distance to the MPFL footprint center (P = .86). Lastly, the sulcus point was estimated to be on average 1.9 ± 2.9 mm distal and 2.0 ± 2.0 mm posterior to the MPFL center point. CONCLUSIONS: The 3 major osseous landmarks of the medial femur have significantly different variances in volume and base:height ratio. Specifically, the variability and elongated morphology of the ME differentiated this landmark from the AT and GT, which demonstrated the most consistent morphology. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of this study may be useful to accurately locate landmarks for femoral tunnel placement and determine the isometric MPFL point during reconstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9791883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97918832022-12-27 Landmarks Used in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Have Variable Topography Dandu, Navya Trasolini, Nicholas A. Hevesi, Mario Zavras, Athan G. Elias, Tristan J. Haneberg, Erik C. Yanke, Adam B. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Original Article PURPOSE: To describe the morphology of the adductor tubercle (AT), medial epicondyle (ME), and gastrocnemius tubercle (GT); to quantify their relationships to the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) footprint location; and to classify the reliability of each landmark based on measurement variability METHODS: Eight cadaveric specimens were dissected to expose the following landmarks on the femur: MPFL footprint, AT, ME, and GT. Using the MicroScribe 3D digitizer, each landmark was projected into a 3-dimensional coordinate system and reconstructed into a complex, closed polygon. For each specimen tubercle, the base surface area, volume, height, base:height ratio, sulcus point, and distance from the MPFL footprint center were calculated. Levene’s test was performed to evaluate differences in variance of the morphologic parameters between the three osseous structures. RESULTS: The ME had significantly greater variance in volume than the GT (P = .032), and the AT (17.5 ± 3.9) and GT (19.5 ± 3.6) were significantly less variable in base:height ratio than the ME (95.3 ± 19.2; P < .001). The GT was the closest to the MPFL footprint center (7.1 ± 3.1 mm) compared with the AT (13.4 ± 3.6 mm, P = .002) and ME (13.2 ± 2.7 mm, P = .003). However, the tubercles were equally variable in terms of distance to the MPFL footprint center (P = .86). Lastly, the sulcus point was estimated to be on average 1.9 ± 2.9 mm distal and 2.0 ± 2.0 mm posterior to the MPFL center point. CONCLUSIONS: The 3 major osseous landmarks of the medial femur have significantly different variances in volume and base:height ratio. Specifically, the variability and elongated morphology of the ME differentiated this landmark from the AT and GT, which demonstrated the most consistent morphology. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of this study may be useful to accurately locate landmarks for femoral tunnel placement and determine the isometric MPFL point during reconstruction. Elsevier 2022-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9791883/ /pubmed/36579037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2022.09.003 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Dandu, Navya
Trasolini, Nicholas A.
Hevesi, Mario
Zavras, Athan G.
Elias, Tristan J.
Haneberg, Erik C.
Yanke, Adam B.
Landmarks Used in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Have Variable Topography
title Landmarks Used in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Have Variable Topography
title_full Landmarks Used in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Have Variable Topography
title_fullStr Landmarks Used in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Have Variable Topography
title_full_unstemmed Landmarks Used in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Have Variable Topography
title_short Landmarks Used in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Have Variable Topography
title_sort landmarks used in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction have variable topography
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9791883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36579037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2022.09.003
work_keys_str_mv AT dandunavya landmarksusedinmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionhavevariabletopography
AT trasolininicholasa landmarksusedinmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionhavevariabletopography
AT hevesimario landmarksusedinmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionhavevariabletopography
AT zavrasathang landmarksusedinmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionhavevariabletopography
AT eliastristanj landmarksusedinmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionhavevariabletopography
AT hanebergerikc landmarksusedinmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionhavevariabletopography
AT yankeadamb landmarksusedinmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionhavevariabletopography