Cargando…

Comparison between Hip Internal Rotation Assistive Device and Conventional Radiograph Positioning: An Experimental Study

INTRODUCTION: Plain anteroposterior radiograph of the hip plays an important role in diagnosing hip pathology. However, one of the most common mistakes is image distortion because the hip is externally rotated due to natural femoral neck anteversion. Thus, the lower extremities should be internally...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sirithiantong, T, Sukhapanon, T, Cheewatanakornkul, R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Malaysian Orthopaedic Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9791903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36589373
http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.2211.002
_version_ 1784859518475173888
author Sirithiantong, T
Sukhapanon, T
Cheewatanakornkul, R
author_facet Sirithiantong, T
Sukhapanon, T
Cheewatanakornkul, R
author_sort Sirithiantong, T
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Plain anteroposterior radiograph of the hip plays an important role in diagnosing hip pathology. However, one of the most common mistakes is image distortion because the hip is externally rotated due to natural femoral neck anteversion. Thus, the lower extremities should be internally rotated by 15°–20°. The researchers developed a hip internal rotation assistive device and compared it with conventional radiograph positioning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A hip internal rotation assistive device was designed. This study consisted of 20 volunteers without clinical hip pathology. The volunteers were informed to do a hip radiograph twice to compare the efficacy of the developed device with a conventional positioning. The thickness of the lesser trochanter (TLT) was measured and interpreted by an orthopedist and a radiologist. Statistical significance and inter- and intra-observer reliabilities were analysed. RESULTS: According to the orthopaedist’s measurement, the mean TLT distance was 4.42 + 3.2mm and 4.97 + 3.16mm for the conventional technique and assistive device, respectively, without statistical significance between both groups (p = 0.05). Consistent with the musculoskeletal radiologist, the mean TLT distance was 4.00 + 2.06mm for the conventional technique and 3.92 + 2.27mm for the assistive device, without statistical significance between both groups (p = 0.56). Intra-observer reliability was 0.900 and 0.898 for the orthopaedist and the radiologist, respectively. Interobserver reliability of the assistive device and conventional technique were 0.800 and 0.588, respectively. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of the developed device was similar to that of the conventional technique. Inter/intra-observer reliabilities were at a good agreement level in both methods. The developed device would also be useful in clinical applications, especially in decreasing unnecessary radiation exposure of medical personnel.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9791903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Malaysian Orthopaedic Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97919032022-12-30 Comparison between Hip Internal Rotation Assistive Device and Conventional Radiograph Positioning: An Experimental Study Sirithiantong, T Sukhapanon, T Cheewatanakornkul, R Malays Orthop J Original Study INTRODUCTION: Plain anteroposterior radiograph of the hip plays an important role in diagnosing hip pathology. However, one of the most common mistakes is image distortion because the hip is externally rotated due to natural femoral neck anteversion. Thus, the lower extremities should be internally rotated by 15°–20°. The researchers developed a hip internal rotation assistive device and compared it with conventional radiograph positioning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A hip internal rotation assistive device was designed. This study consisted of 20 volunteers without clinical hip pathology. The volunteers were informed to do a hip radiograph twice to compare the efficacy of the developed device with a conventional positioning. The thickness of the lesser trochanter (TLT) was measured and interpreted by an orthopedist and a radiologist. Statistical significance and inter- and intra-observer reliabilities were analysed. RESULTS: According to the orthopaedist’s measurement, the mean TLT distance was 4.42 + 3.2mm and 4.97 + 3.16mm for the conventional technique and assistive device, respectively, without statistical significance between both groups (p = 0.05). Consistent with the musculoskeletal radiologist, the mean TLT distance was 4.00 + 2.06mm for the conventional technique and 3.92 + 2.27mm for the assistive device, without statistical significance between both groups (p = 0.56). Intra-observer reliability was 0.900 and 0.898 for the orthopaedist and the radiologist, respectively. Interobserver reliability of the assistive device and conventional technique were 0.800 and 0.588, respectively. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of the developed device was similar to that of the conventional technique. Inter/intra-observer reliabilities were at a good agreement level in both methods. The developed device would also be useful in clinical applications, especially in decreasing unnecessary radiation exposure of medical personnel. Malaysian Orthopaedic Association 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9791903/ /pubmed/36589373 http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.2211.002 Text en © 2022 Malaysian Orthopaedic Association (MOA). All Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
spellingShingle Original Study
Sirithiantong, T
Sukhapanon, T
Cheewatanakornkul, R
Comparison between Hip Internal Rotation Assistive Device and Conventional Radiograph Positioning: An Experimental Study
title Comparison between Hip Internal Rotation Assistive Device and Conventional Radiograph Positioning: An Experimental Study
title_full Comparison between Hip Internal Rotation Assistive Device and Conventional Radiograph Positioning: An Experimental Study
title_fullStr Comparison between Hip Internal Rotation Assistive Device and Conventional Radiograph Positioning: An Experimental Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Hip Internal Rotation Assistive Device and Conventional Radiograph Positioning: An Experimental Study
title_short Comparison between Hip Internal Rotation Assistive Device and Conventional Radiograph Positioning: An Experimental Study
title_sort comparison between hip internal rotation assistive device and conventional radiograph positioning: an experimental study
topic Original Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9791903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36589373
http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.2211.002
work_keys_str_mv AT sirithiantongt comparisonbetweenhipinternalrotationassistivedeviceandconventionalradiographpositioninganexperimentalstudy
AT sukhapanont comparisonbetweenhipinternalrotationassistivedeviceandconventionalradiographpositioninganexperimentalstudy
AT cheewatanakornkulr comparisonbetweenhipinternalrotationassistivedeviceandconventionalradiographpositioninganexperimentalstudy