Cargando…

Quality Improvement in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND: Quality improvement interventions are used extensively in health care, aiming to improve delivery and promote best practice. The impact of quality improvement interventions implemented in stroke rehabilitation remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this scoping review is to examine the d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shafei, Ingy, Karnon, Jonathan, Crotty, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9791932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36578360
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S389567
_version_ 1784859525002559488
author Shafei, Ingy
Karnon, Jonathan
Crotty, Maria
author_facet Shafei, Ingy
Karnon, Jonathan
Crotty, Maria
author_sort Shafei, Ingy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quality improvement interventions are used extensively in health care, aiming to improve delivery and promote best practice. The impact of quality improvement interventions implemented in stroke rehabilitation remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this scoping review is to examine the different types of published quality improvement interventions in stroke rehabilitation and their impact on improving the quality of care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A scoping review was performed in the PubMed, Embase and CINAHL databases. QI studies evaluating interventions for stroke rehabilitation patients that were published up to August 2020 were included. The review looked at the types of quality improvement interventions that have been evaluated as well as the improvements/impacts reported for quality improvement interventions for stroke patients in rehabilitation. RESULTS: We reviewed 1580 studies, twelve quality improvement interventions met inclusion criteria and were included in the current study. Six studies involved organizational change, three studies involved provider education and audit-feedback and three studies involved provider education. Of the twelve quality improvement interventions that have been included, >90% reported improvements (91.6%). In the majority of cases, improvements were noted through implementation of a myriad of interventions. Several facilitators and barriers were noted during implementation and contributed to success or failure of the intervention. CONCLUSION: There is paucity of full-text peer-reviewed published research investigating quality improvement interventions for improving the quality of care in stroke rehabilitation. The current review offers value to healthcare providers in terms of key success factors, contextual factors, barriers and facilitators associated with improvements in stroke rehabilitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9791932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97919322022-12-27 Quality Improvement in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review Shafei, Ingy Karnon, Jonathan Crotty, Maria J Multidiscip Healthc Review BACKGROUND: Quality improvement interventions are used extensively in health care, aiming to improve delivery and promote best practice. The impact of quality improvement interventions implemented in stroke rehabilitation remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this scoping review is to examine the different types of published quality improvement interventions in stroke rehabilitation and their impact on improving the quality of care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A scoping review was performed in the PubMed, Embase and CINAHL databases. QI studies evaluating interventions for stroke rehabilitation patients that were published up to August 2020 were included. The review looked at the types of quality improvement interventions that have been evaluated as well as the improvements/impacts reported for quality improvement interventions for stroke patients in rehabilitation. RESULTS: We reviewed 1580 studies, twelve quality improvement interventions met inclusion criteria and were included in the current study. Six studies involved organizational change, three studies involved provider education and audit-feedback and three studies involved provider education. Of the twelve quality improvement interventions that have been included, >90% reported improvements (91.6%). In the majority of cases, improvements were noted through implementation of a myriad of interventions. Several facilitators and barriers were noted during implementation and contributed to success or failure of the intervention. CONCLUSION: There is paucity of full-text peer-reviewed published research investigating quality improvement interventions for improving the quality of care in stroke rehabilitation. The current review offers value to healthcare providers in terms of key success factors, contextual factors, barriers and facilitators associated with improvements in stroke rehabilitation. Dove 2022-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9791932/ /pubmed/36578360 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S389567 Text en © 2022 Shafei et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Shafei, Ingy
Karnon, Jonathan
Crotty, Maria
Quality Improvement in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review
title Quality Improvement in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review
title_full Quality Improvement in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Quality Improvement in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Quality Improvement in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review
title_short Quality Improvement in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review
title_sort quality improvement in stroke rehabilitation: a scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9791932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36578360
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S389567
work_keys_str_mv AT shafeiingy qualityimprovementinstrokerehabilitationascopingreview
AT karnonjonathan qualityimprovementinstrokerehabilitationascopingreview
AT crottymaria qualityimprovementinstrokerehabilitationascopingreview