Cargando…

Comparison of Swiss versus Standard Acupuncture in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain. A Study Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blind, Parallel Trial

INTRODUCTION: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) cannot sufficiently be treated by pharmacological therapy and generates substantial health-care costs worldwide. Acupuncture, a cost-effective, safe and non-pharmacological therapy, has shown promising results in relieving acute low back pain; however, the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pradhan, Saroj K, Angst, Felix, Xu, Jie, Gantenbein, Andreas R, Lehmann, Susanne, Sandor, Peter S, Li, Yiming, Furian, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9792106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36579179
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S388558
_version_ 1784859562170384384
author Pradhan, Saroj K
Angst, Felix
Xu, Jie
Gantenbein, Andreas R
Lehmann, Susanne
Sandor, Peter S
Li, Yiming
Furian, Michael
author_facet Pradhan, Saroj K
Angst, Felix
Xu, Jie
Gantenbein, Andreas R
Lehmann, Susanne
Sandor, Peter S
Li, Yiming
Furian, Michael
author_sort Pradhan, Saroj K
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) cannot sufficiently be treated by pharmacological therapy and generates substantial health-care costs worldwide. Acupuncture, a cost-effective, safe and non-pharmacological therapy, has shown promising results in relieving acute low back pain; however, the optimal acupuncture therapy for CLBP remains controversial. This study will compare two acupuncture methods for pain relief in CLBP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This randomized, controlled, single-blind, parallel trial will be conducted in patients with clinically diagnosed CLBP with a disease duration ≥3 months and an average pain intensity of ≥4 points on an 11-point Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (pain-NRS) on the previous 7 days. Patients will be randomized to 9-week acupuncture therapy using Jiu Gong Points (termed Swiss low back acupuncture, SLBA) or standard acupuncture (SA) therapy (weeks 1–6: two sessions/week, weeks 7–9: one session/week, 15 sessions/patient in total). Measurements will be conducted before the first session (T1), at the end of the 9-week therapy (T2) and after 3- and 6-month follow-up (T3 and T4). The primary hypothesis is that 9 weeks of SLBA will be superior in reducing the pain severity assessed by the pain-NRS compared to SA therapy for CLBP. Secondary outcomes will be derived from the Short-Form 36, Oswestry Disability Index, Multidimensional Pain Inventory questionnaire, Symptom Checklist-90 – Revised questionnaire and a daily pain diary. Assuming a minimal clinically important difference in the pain-NRS of 0.39 and an effect size of ≥0.6 between SLBA and SA, 80% power, 0.05 alpha level and 20% dropouts, a total of 55 patients/arm will be required. The primary outcome will be analyzed in the intention-to-treat population using chained linear regression models. Patients, outcome assessors and data analysts will be blinded to the treatment arm. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT05232487.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9792106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97921062022-12-27 Comparison of Swiss versus Standard Acupuncture in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain. A Study Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blind, Parallel Trial Pradhan, Saroj K Angst, Felix Xu, Jie Gantenbein, Andreas R Lehmann, Susanne Sandor, Peter S Li, Yiming Furian, Michael J Pain Res Study Protocol INTRODUCTION: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) cannot sufficiently be treated by pharmacological therapy and generates substantial health-care costs worldwide. Acupuncture, a cost-effective, safe and non-pharmacological therapy, has shown promising results in relieving acute low back pain; however, the optimal acupuncture therapy for CLBP remains controversial. This study will compare two acupuncture methods for pain relief in CLBP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This randomized, controlled, single-blind, parallel trial will be conducted in patients with clinically diagnosed CLBP with a disease duration ≥3 months and an average pain intensity of ≥4 points on an 11-point Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (pain-NRS) on the previous 7 days. Patients will be randomized to 9-week acupuncture therapy using Jiu Gong Points (termed Swiss low back acupuncture, SLBA) or standard acupuncture (SA) therapy (weeks 1–6: two sessions/week, weeks 7–9: one session/week, 15 sessions/patient in total). Measurements will be conducted before the first session (T1), at the end of the 9-week therapy (T2) and after 3- and 6-month follow-up (T3 and T4). The primary hypothesis is that 9 weeks of SLBA will be superior in reducing the pain severity assessed by the pain-NRS compared to SA therapy for CLBP. Secondary outcomes will be derived from the Short-Form 36, Oswestry Disability Index, Multidimensional Pain Inventory questionnaire, Symptom Checklist-90 – Revised questionnaire and a daily pain diary. Assuming a minimal clinically important difference in the pain-NRS of 0.39 and an effect size of ≥0.6 between SLBA and SA, 80% power, 0.05 alpha level and 20% dropouts, a total of 55 patients/arm will be required. The primary outcome will be analyzed in the intention-to-treat population using chained linear regression models. Patients, outcome assessors and data analysts will be blinded to the treatment arm. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT05232487. Dove 2022-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9792106/ /pubmed/36579179 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S388558 Text en © 2022 Pradhan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Pradhan, Saroj K
Angst, Felix
Xu, Jie
Gantenbein, Andreas R
Lehmann, Susanne
Sandor, Peter S
Li, Yiming
Furian, Michael
Comparison of Swiss versus Standard Acupuncture in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain. A Study Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blind, Parallel Trial
title Comparison of Swiss versus Standard Acupuncture in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain. A Study Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blind, Parallel Trial
title_full Comparison of Swiss versus Standard Acupuncture in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain. A Study Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blind, Parallel Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of Swiss versus Standard Acupuncture in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain. A Study Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blind, Parallel Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Swiss versus Standard Acupuncture in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain. A Study Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blind, Parallel Trial
title_short Comparison of Swiss versus Standard Acupuncture in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain. A Study Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blind, Parallel Trial
title_sort comparison of swiss versus standard acupuncture in patients with chronic low back pain. a study protocol for a randomized, controlled, single-blind, parallel trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9792106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36579179
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S388558
work_keys_str_mv AT pradhansarojk comparisonofswissversusstandardacupunctureinpatientswithchroniclowbackpainastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledsingleblindparalleltrial
AT angstfelix comparisonofswissversusstandardacupunctureinpatientswithchroniclowbackpainastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledsingleblindparalleltrial
AT xujie comparisonofswissversusstandardacupunctureinpatientswithchroniclowbackpainastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledsingleblindparalleltrial
AT gantenbeinandreasr comparisonofswissversusstandardacupunctureinpatientswithchroniclowbackpainastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledsingleblindparalleltrial
AT lehmannsusanne comparisonofswissversusstandardacupunctureinpatientswithchroniclowbackpainastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledsingleblindparalleltrial
AT sandorpeters comparisonofswissversusstandardacupunctureinpatientswithchroniclowbackpainastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledsingleblindparalleltrial
AT liyiming comparisonofswissversusstandardacupunctureinpatientswithchroniclowbackpainastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledsingleblindparalleltrial
AT furianmichael comparisonofswissversusstandardacupunctureinpatientswithchroniclowbackpainastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledsingleblindparalleltrial