Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of prone position in COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Prone position has already been demonstrated to improve survival in non-COVID acute respiratory distress syndrome and has been widely performed in COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure, both in non-intubated and intubated patients. However, the beneficial effect of the prone positio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9792321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36572946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00953-z |
_version_ | 1784859609334284288 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Hyeon-Jeong Kim, Junghyun Choi, Miyoung Choi, Won-Il Joh, Joonsung Park, Jungeun Kim, Joohae |
author_facet | Lee, Hyeon-Jeong Kim, Junghyun Choi, Miyoung Choi, Won-Il Joh, Joonsung Park, Jungeun Kim, Joohae |
author_sort | Lee, Hyeon-Jeong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Prone position has already been demonstrated to improve survival in non-COVID acute respiratory distress syndrome and has been widely performed in COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure, both in non-intubated and intubated patients. However, the beneficial effect of the prone position in COVID-19 pneumonia still remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the prone position compared with the non-prone in non-intubated and intubated COVID-19 patients, respectively. METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases, as well as one Korean domestic database, on July 9, 2021, and updated the search 9 times to September 14, 2022. Studies that compared prone and non-prone positions in patients with COVID-19 were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcomes were mortality, need for intubation, and adverse events. RESULTS: Of the 1259 records identified, 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 23 nonrandomized studies (NRSs) were eligible. In the non-intubated patients, the prone position reduced the intubation rate compared with the non-prone position in 6 RCTs (n = 2156, RR 0.81, P = 0.0002) and in 18 NRSs (n = 3374, RR 0.65, P = 0.002). In the subgroup analysis according to the oxygen delivery method, the results were constant only in the HFNC or NIV subgroup. For mortality, RCTs reported no difference between prone and non-prone groups, but in NRSs, the prone position had a significant advantage in mortality [18 NRSs, n = 3361, relative risk (RR) 0.56, P < 0.00001] regardless of the oxygen delivery methods shown in the subgroup analysis. There was no RCT for intubated patients, and mortality did not differ between the prone and non-prone groups in NRSs. Adverse events reported in both the non-intubated and intubated groups were mild and similar between the prone and non-intubated groups. CONCLUSION: For non-intubated patients with COVID-19, prone positioning reduced the risk of intubation, particularly in patients requiring a high-flow oxygen system. However, the survival benefit was unclear between the prone and non-prone groups. There was insufficient evidence to support the beneficial effects of prone positioning in intubated patients. Trial registration This study was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews on February 16, 2022 (Registration No.: CRD42022311150). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40001-022-00953-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9792321 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97923212022-12-27 Efficacy and safety of prone position in COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lee, Hyeon-Jeong Kim, Junghyun Choi, Miyoung Choi, Won-Il Joh, Joonsung Park, Jungeun Kim, Joohae Eur J Med Res Research BACKGROUND: Prone position has already been demonstrated to improve survival in non-COVID acute respiratory distress syndrome and has been widely performed in COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure, both in non-intubated and intubated patients. However, the beneficial effect of the prone position in COVID-19 pneumonia still remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the prone position compared with the non-prone in non-intubated and intubated COVID-19 patients, respectively. METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases, as well as one Korean domestic database, on July 9, 2021, and updated the search 9 times to September 14, 2022. Studies that compared prone and non-prone positions in patients with COVID-19 were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcomes were mortality, need for intubation, and adverse events. RESULTS: Of the 1259 records identified, 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 23 nonrandomized studies (NRSs) were eligible. In the non-intubated patients, the prone position reduced the intubation rate compared with the non-prone position in 6 RCTs (n = 2156, RR 0.81, P = 0.0002) and in 18 NRSs (n = 3374, RR 0.65, P = 0.002). In the subgroup analysis according to the oxygen delivery method, the results were constant only in the HFNC or NIV subgroup. For mortality, RCTs reported no difference between prone and non-prone groups, but in NRSs, the prone position had a significant advantage in mortality [18 NRSs, n = 3361, relative risk (RR) 0.56, P < 0.00001] regardless of the oxygen delivery methods shown in the subgroup analysis. There was no RCT for intubated patients, and mortality did not differ between the prone and non-prone groups in NRSs. Adverse events reported in both the non-intubated and intubated groups were mild and similar between the prone and non-intubated groups. CONCLUSION: For non-intubated patients with COVID-19, prone positioning reduced the risk of intubation, particularly in patients requiring a high-flow oxygen system. However, the survival benefit was unclear between the prone and non-prone groups. There was insufficient evidence to support the beneficial effects of prone positioning in intubated patients. Trial registration This study was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews on February 16, 2022 (Registration No.: CRD42022311150). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40001-022-00953-z. BioMed Central 2022-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9792321/ /pubmed/36572946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00953-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Lee, Hyeon-Jeong Kim, Junghyun Choi, Miyoung Choi, Won-Il Joh, Joonsung Park, Jungeun Kim, Joohae Efficacy and safety of prone position in COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Efficacy and safety of prone position in COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of prone position in COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of prone position in COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of prone position in COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of prone position in COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of prone position in covid-19 patients with respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9792321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36572946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00953-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leehyeonjeong efficacyandsafetyofpronepositionincovid19patientswithrespiratoryfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kimjunghyun efficacyandsafetyofpronepositionincovid19patientswithrespiratoryfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT choimiyoung efficacyandsafetyofpronepositionincovid19patientswithrespiratoryfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT choiwonil efficacyandsafetyofpronepositionincovid19patientswithrespiratoryfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT johjoonsung efficacyandsafetyofpronepositionincovid19patientswithrespiratoryfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT parkjungeun efficacyandsafetyofpronepositionincovid19patientswithrespiratoryfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kimjoohae efficacyandsafetyofpronepositionincovid19patientswithrespiratoryfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |