Cargando…

Applying the RE-AIM implementation framework to evaluate diabetes health coaching in individuals with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and secondary analysis

BACKGROUND: Diabetes health coaching continues to emerge as an effective intervention to support diabetes self-management. While previous systematic reviews have focused on the effectiveness of diabetes health coaching programs in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), limited literature is available o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Racey, Megan, Jovkovic, Milos, Alliston, Paige, Sherifali, Diana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9792599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36583001
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1069436
_version_ 1784859671360700416
author Racey, Megan
Jovkovic, Milos
Alliston, Paige
Sherifali, Diana
author_facet Racey, Megan
Jovkovic, Milos
Alliston, Paige
Sherifali, Diana
author_sort Racey, Megan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diabetes health coaching continues to emerge as an effective intervention to support diabetes self-management. While previous systematic reviews have focused on the effectiveness of diabetes health coaching programs in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), limited literature is available on its implementation. This review examines what aspects of diabetes health coaching interventions for adults living with type 2 diabetes have been reported using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework to optimize implementation. METHODS: We examined the included studies from our recently completed systematic review, which searched 6 databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of health coaching interventions delivered by a health professional for adults with T2DM. Reviewers screened citations and extracted data for study characteristics and the 5 dimensions (62 criteria) of the RE-AIM framework. RESULTS: 9 diabetes health coaching RCTs were included in this review. 12 criteria were reported by all the included studies and 21 criteria were not reported by any of the studies. The included studies all reported on more than 20 RE-AIM criteria, ranging from 21 to 27. While Reach was the best reported construct by the included studies, followed by Effectiveness and Implementation, the criteria within the Adoption and Maintenance constructs were rarely mentioned by these studies. In general, there was also wide variation in how each of the criteria were reported on by study authors CONCLUSIONS: Due to the paucity of reporting of the RE-AIM components for diabetes health coaching, limited implementation and clinical practice implications can be drawn. The lack of detail regarding implementation approaches to diabetes health coaching greatly limits the interpretation and comparisons across studies to best inform the application of this intervention to support diabetes self-management. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO identifier, CRD42022347478
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9792599
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97925992022-12-28 Applying the RE-AIM implementation framework to evaluate diabetes health coaching in individuals with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and secondary analysis Racey, Megan Jovkovic, Milos Alliston, Paige Sherifali, Diana Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology BACKGROUND: Diabetes health coaching continues to emerge as an effective intervention to support diabetes self-management. While previous systematic reviews have focused on the effectiveness of diabetes health coaching programs in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), limited literature is available on its implementation. This review examines what aspects of diabetes health coaching interventions for adults living with type 2 diabetes have been reported using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework to optimize implementation. METHODS: We examined the included studies from our recently completed systematic review, which searched 6 databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of health coaching interventions delivered by a health professional for adults with T2DM. Reviewers screened citations and extracted data for study characteristics and the 5 dimensions (62 criteria) of the RE-AIM framework. RESULTS: 9 diabetes health coaching RCTs were included in this review. 12 criteria were reported by all the included studies and 21 criteria were not reported by any of the studies. The included studies all reported on more than 20 RE-AIM criteria, ranging from 21 to 27. While Reach was the best reported construct by the included studies, followed by Effectiveness and Implementation, the criteria within the Adoption and Maintenance constructs were rarely mentioned by these studies. In general, there was also wide variation in how each of the criteria were reported on by study authors CONCLUSIONS: Due to the paucity of reporting of the RE-AIM components for diabetes health coaching, limited implementation and clinical practice implications can be drawn. The lack of detail regarding implementation approaches to diabetes health coaching greatly limits the interpretation and comparisons across studies to best inform the application of this intervention to support diabetes self-management. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO identifier, CRD42022347478 Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9792599/ /pubmed/36583001 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1069436 Text en Copyright © 2022 Racey, Jovkovic, Alliston and Sherifali https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Racey, Megan
Jovkovic, Milos
Alliston, Paige
Sherifali, Diana
Applying the RE-AIM implementation framework to evaluate diabetes health coaching in individuals with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and secondary analysis
title Applying the RE-AIM implementation framework to evaluate diabetes health coaching in individuals with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and secondary analysis
title_full Applying the RE-AIM implementation framework to evaluate diabetes health coaching in individuals with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and secondary analysis
title_fullStr Applying the RE-AIM implementation framework to evaluate diabetes health coaching in individuals with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and secondary analysis
title_full_unstemmed Applying the RE-AIM implementation framework to evaluate diabetes health coaching in individuals with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and secondary analysis
title_short Applying the RE-AIM implementation framework to evaluate diabetes health coaching in individuals with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and secondary analysis
title_sort applying the re-aim implementation framework to evaluate diabetes health coaching in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and secondary analysis
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9792599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36583001
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1069436
work_keys_str_mv AT raceymegan applyingthereaimimplementationframeworktoevaluatediabeteshealthcoachinginindividualswithtype2diabetesasystematicreviewandsecondaryanalysis
AT jovkovicmilos applyingthereaimimplementationframeworktoevaluatediabeteshealthcoachinginindividualswithtype2diabetesasystematicreviewandsecondaryanalysis
AT allistonpaige applyingthereaimimplementationframeworktoevaluatediabeteshealthcoachinginindividualswithtype2diabetesasystematicreviewandsecondaryanalysis
AT sherifalidiana applyingthereaimimplementationframeworktoevaluatediabeteshealthcoachinginindividualswithtype2diabetesasystematicreviewandsecondaryanalysis