Cargando…
Orchiectomy due to delayed severe scrotal hematocele after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for a giant inguinoscrotal hernia: a case report
BACKGROUND: A giant inguinoscrotal hernia is a rare inguinal hernia that extends below the midpoint of the inner thigh while standing. Although reports of laparoscopic surgery for giant inguinoscrotal hernias have increased, the risk of delayed hematocele has not yet been clarified. CASE PRESENTATIO...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9792633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36572781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40792-022-01579-3 |
_version_ | 1784859677530521600 |
---|---|
author | Nakamura, Kenichi Shibasaki, Susumu Takenaka, Masashi Serizawa, Akiko Akimoto, Shingo Nakauchi, Masaya Tanaka, Tsuyoshi Inaba, Kazuki Shiroki, Ryoichi Uyama, Ichiro Suda, Koichi |
author_facet | Nakamura, Kenichi Shibasaki, Susumu Takenaka, Masashi Serizawa, Akiko Akimoto, Shingo Nakauchi, Masaya Tanaka, Tsuyoshi Inaba, Kazuki Shiroki, Ryoichi Uyama, Ichiro Suda, Koichi |
author_sort | Nakamura, Kenichi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A giant inguinoscrotal hernia is a rare inguinal hernia that extends below the midpoint of the inner thigh while standing. Although reports of laparoscopic surgery for giant inguinoscrotal hernias have increased, the risk of delayed hematocele has not yet been clarified. CASE PRESENTATION: A 68-year-old man was evaluated for a left giant inguinoscrotal hernia, and laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) was performed. In the procedure, the distal hernia sac was not resected. The postoperative course was uneventful for 3 months postsurgery, after which he complained of giant scrotal swelling, which gradually grew to 13 cm. It did not improve with several punctures and caused dysuria because of increased pressure on the urethra. Thus, reoperation was performed 9 months after surgery. The hematocele consisted of a thickened hernia sac, which was tightly adhered to the spermatic cord and testicle. The hernia sac including the hematocele was removed from the scrotum through an anterior approach, preserving the spermatic cord and testicle. On the third postoperative day, an orchiectomy was performed due to poor testicular perfusion caused by spermatic cord injury. There was no hematocele or hernia at the 3-year follow-up. The remnant sac after laparoscopic TAPP for a giant inguinoscrotal hernia possibly caused refractory hematocele. Additionally, the removal of the hernia sac, including hematocele, from the spermatic cord and testicle has a risk of inducing injury, leading to orchiectomy. CONCLUSION: Surgeons should be aware of the possibility of delayed refractory hematoceles after laparoscopic TAPP for giant inguinoscrotal hernias when the hernia sac is not resected. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9792633 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97926332022-12-28 Orchiectomy due to delayed severe scrotal hematocele after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for a giant inguinoscrotal hernia: a case report Nakamura, Kenichi Shibasaki, Susumu Takenaka, Masashi Serizawa, Akiko Akimoto, Shingo Nakauchi, Masaya Tanaka, Tsuyoshi Inaba, Kazuki Shiroki, Ryoichi Uyama, Ichiro Suda, Koichi Surg Case Rep Case Report BACKGROUND: A giant inguinoscrotal hernia is a rare inguinal hernia that extends below the midpoint of the inner thigh while standing. Although reports of laparoscopic surgery for giant inguinoscrotal hernias have increased, the risk of delayed hematocele has not yet been clarified. CASE PRESENTATION: A 68-year-old man was evaluated for a left giant inguinoscrotal hernia, and laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) was performed. In the procedure, the distal hernia sac was not resected. The postoperative course was uneventful for 3 months postsurgery, after which he complained of giant scrotal swelling, which gradually grew to 13 cm. It did not improve with several punctures and caused dysuria because of increased pressure on the urethra. Thus, reoperation was performed 9 months after surgery. The hematocele consisted of a thickened hernia sac, which was tightly adhered to the spermatic cord and testicle. The hernia sac including the hematocele was removed from the scrotum through an anterior approach, preserving the spermatic cord and testicle. On the third postoperative day, an orchiectomy was performed due to poor testicular perfusion caused by spermatic cord injury. There was no hematocele or hernia at the 3-year follow-up. The remnant sac after laparoscopic TAPP for a giant inguinoscrotal hernia possibly caused refractory hematocele. Additionally, the removal of the hernia sac, including hematocele, from the spermatic cord and testicle has a risk of inducing injury, leading to orchiectomy. CONCLUSION: Surgeons should be aware of the possibility of delayed refractory hematoceles after laparoscopic TAPP for giant inguinoscrotal hernias when the hernia sac is not resected. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9792633/ /pubmed/36572781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40792-022-01579-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Case Report Nakamura, Kenichi Shibasaki, Susumu Takenaka, Masashi Serizawa, Akiko Akimoto, Shingo Nakauchi, Masaya Tanaka, Tsuyoshi Inaba, Kazuki Shiroki, Ryoichi Uyama, Ichiro Suda, Koichi Orchiectomy due to delayed severe scrotal hematocele after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for a giant inguinoscrotal hernia: a case report |
title | Orchiectomy due to delayed severe scrotal hematocele after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for a giant inguinoscrotal hernia: a case report |
title_full | Orchiectomy due to delayed severe scrotal hematocele after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for a giant inguinoscrotal hernia: a case report |
title_fullStr | Orchiectomy due to delayed severe scrotal hematocele after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for a giant inguinoscrotal hernia: a case report |
title_full_unstemmed | Orchiectomy due to delayed severe scrotal hematocele after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for a giant inguinoscrotal hernia: a case report |
title_short | Orchiectomy due to delayed severe scrotal hematocele after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for a giant inguinoscrotal hernia: a case report |
title_sort | orchiectomy due to delayed severe scrotal hematocele after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for a giant inguinoscrotal hernia: a case report |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9792633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36572781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40792-022-01579-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nakamurakenichi orchiectomyduetodelayedseverescrotalhematoceleafterlaparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealrepairforagiantinguinoscrotalherniaacasereport AT shibasakisusumu orchiectomyduetodelayedseverescrotalhematoceleafterlaparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealrepairforagiantinguinoscrotalherniaacasereport AT takenakamasashi orchiectomyduetodelayedseverescrotalhematoceleafterlaparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealrepairforagiantinguinoscrotalherniaacasereport AT serizawaakiko orchiectomyduetodelayedseverescrotalhematoceleafterlaparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealrepairforagiantinguinoscrotalherniaacasereport AT akimotoshingo orchiectomyduetodelayedseverescrotalhematoceleafterlaparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealrepairforagiantinguinoscrotalherniaacasereport AT nakauchimasaya orchiectomyduetodelayedseverescrotalhematoceleafterlaparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealrepairforagiantinguinoscrotalherniaacasereport AT tanakatsuyoshi orchiectomyduetodelayedseverescrotalhematoceleafterlaparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealrepairforagiantinguinoscrotalherniaacasereport AT inabakazuki orchiectomyduetodelayedseverescrotalhematoceleafterlaparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealrepairforagiantinguinoscrotalherniaacasereport AT shirokiryoichi orchiectomyduetodelayedseverescrotalhematoceleafterlaparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealrepairforagiantinguinoscrotalherniaacasereport AT uyamaichiro orchiectomyduetodelayedseverescrotalhematoceleafterlaparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealrepairforagiantinguinoscrotalherniaacasereport AT sudakoichi orchiectomyduetodelayedseverescrotalhematoceleafterlaparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealrepairforagiantinguinoscrotalherniaacasereport |