Cargando…
Assessment of Less Lethal Impact Munitions Using the Facial and Ocular CountermeasUre for Safety (FOCUS) Headform
Recent social protests and gatherings in the USA have prompted law enforcement agencies to increase their use of less lethal impact munitions (LLIMs) for crowd control. Media reports and firsthand accounts have indicated that many of the LLIMs are impacting individuals in the head and neck regions....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Nature Singapore
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9792641/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41314-022-00045-0 |
_version_ | 1784859678763646976 |
---|---|
author | Bir, Cynthia Sherman, Donald MacDonald, Robert Esquivel, Amanda |
author_facet | Bir, Cynthia Sherman, Donald MacDonald, Robert Esquivel, Amanda |
author_sort | Bir, Cynthia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent social protests and gatherings in the USA have prompted law enforcement agencies to increase their use of less lethal impact munitions (LLIMs) for crowd control. Media reports and firsthand accounts have indicated that many of the LLIMs are impacting individuals in the head and neck regions. There is very little data available on the risk of injury (ROI) from LLIM impacts to these body regions. The Facial and Ocular CountermeasUre for Safety (FOCUS) surrogate headform was used to assess the ROI (fracture) from LLIM impacts. LLIMs were fired at the FOCUS headform to determine the ROI to the frontal and maxilla bones. Sixteen different LLIMs were assessed which included 12-gauge, 37-mm, and 40-mm caliber projectiles from five manufacturers. The LLIMs included bean bag style, rubber, and foam/sponge projectiles. Each LLIM was tested multiple times to determine the average ROI. The average peak resultant frontal bone force ranged from 2.0 to 7.6 kN which represented ROIs from ~ 30% up to 95%. The average peak resultant maxilla bone force ranged from 1.0 to 4.4 kN which represented ROIs from ~ 30% up to 99%. In general, 12-gauge LLIMs had a lower ROI than the larger caliber LLIMs and the rubber projectiles had a lower ROI than the bean bag style projectiles. Due to the relative thickness, the maxilla has a much lower fracture force than the frontal bone, and this was borne out in the ROIs from the maxilla impacts. Impacts to both bones showed a positive correlation between normalized energy and resultant force (p < 0.01). The slope of the plotted resultant force against the normalized energy for the 12-gauge munitions was significantly smaller compared to larger calibers for both impact sites, frontal (p = 0.031), and maxilla (p < 0.001). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9792641 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Nature Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97926412022-12-27 Assessment of Less Lethal Impact Munitions Using the Facial and Ocular CountermeasUre for Safety (FOCUS) Headform Bir, Cynthia Sherman, Donald MacDonald, Robert Esquivel, Amanda Hum Factors Mech Eng Def Saf Original Paper Recent social protests and gatherings in the USA have prompted law enforcement agencies to increase their use of less lethal impact munitions (LLIMs) for crowd control. Media reports and firsthand accounts have indicated that many of the LLIMs are impacting individuals in the head and neck regions. There is very little data available on the risk of injury (ROI) from LLIM impacts to these body regions. The Facial and Ocular CountermeasUre for Safety (FOCUS) surrogate headform was used to assess the ROI (fracture) from LLIM impacts. LLIMs were fired at the FOCUS headform to determine the ROI to the frontal and maxilla bones. Sixteen different LLIMs were assessed which included 12-gauge, 37-mm, and 40-mm caliber projectiles from five manufacturers. The LLIMs included bean bag style, rubber, and foam/sponge projectiles. Each LLIM was tested multiple times to determine the average ROI. The average peak resultant frontal bone force ranged from 2.0 to 7.6 kN which represented ROIs from ~ 30% up to 95%. The average peak resultant maxilla bone force ranged from 1.0 to 4.4 kN which represented ROIs from ~ 30% up to 99%. In general, 12-gauge LLIMs had a lower ROI than the larger caliber LLIMs and the rubber projectiles had a lower ROI than the bean bag style projectiles. Due to the relative thickness, the maxilla has a much lower fracture force than the frontal bone, and this was borne out in the ROIs from the maxilla impacts. Impacts to both bones showed a positive correlation between normalized energy and resultant force (p < 0.01). The slope of the plotted resultant force against the normalized energy for the 12-gauge munitions was significantly smaller compared to larger calibers for both impact sites, frontal (p = 0.031), and maxilla (p < 0.001). Springer Nature Singapore 2022-02-16 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9792641/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41314-022-00045-0 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Bir, Cynthia Sherman, Donald MacDonald, Robert Esquivel, Amanda Assessment of Less Lethal Impact Munitions Using the Facial and Ocular CountermeasUre for Safety (FOCUS) Headform |
title | Assessment of Less Lethal Impact Munitions Using the Facial and Ocular CountermeasUre for Safety (FOCUS) Headform |
title_full | Assessment of Less Lethal Impact Munitions Using the Facial and Ocular CountermeasUre for Safety (FOCUS) Headform |
title_fullStr | Assessment of Less Lethal Impact Munitions Using the Facial and Ocular CountermeasUre for Safety (FOCUS) Headform |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of Less Lethal Impact Munitions Using the Facial and Ocular CountermeasUre for Safety (FOCUS) Headform |
title_short | Assessment of Less Lethal Impact Munitions Using the Facial and Ocular CountermeasUre for Safety (FOCUS) Headform |
title_sort | assessment of less lethal impact munitions using the facial and ocular countermeasure for safety (focus) headform |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9792641/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41314-022-00045-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bircynthia assessmentoflesslethalimpactmunitionsusingthefacialandocularcountermeasureforsafetyfocusheadform AT shermandonald assessmentoflesslethalimpactmunitionsusingthefacialandocularcountermeasureforsafetyfocusheadform AT macdonaldrobert assessmentoflesslethalimpactmunitionsusingthefacialandocularcountermeasureforsafetyfocusheadform AT esquivelamanda assessmentoflesslethalimpactmunitionsusingthefacialandocularcountermeasureforsafetyfocusheadform |