Cargando…
Surgical approaches to mediastinal cysts: clinical practice review
The traditional approach to mediastinal cyst and mass resection has been open via median sternotomy or thoracotomy. With the advent of minimally invasive techniques, there have been successful cases completed via video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) and robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS). Al...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9792838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36582973 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/med-22-20 |
_version_ | 1784859721168060416 |
---|---|
author | Hsu, Diana S. Banks, Kian C. Velotta, Jeffrey B. |
author_facet | Hsu, Diana S. Banks, Kian C. Velotta, Jeffrey B. |
author_sort | Hsu, Diana S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The traditional approach to mediastinal cyst and mass resection has been open via median sternotomy or thoracotomy. With the advent of minimally invasive techniques, there have been successful cases completed via video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) and robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS). Although mediastinal cysts are uncommon, they are a significant and relevant topic in the practice of thoracic surgery. Thus, this clinical practice review aims to summarize and highlight some of the key case series and retrospective studies in order to provide insight on each of the approaches. In addition, there is a brief review of other approaches, such as subxiphoid, and the utility of endobronchial ultrasound in the management of mediastinal cysts. In this review, the identified benefits of VATS and RATS lie largely in quality improvement of the patient experience—decreased length of stay (LOS) and pain—without compromising patient outcomes. However, the open approach remains a viable option, particularly for the management of large cysts or as a bail-out option. When surgeons approach with VATS or RATS and encounter bleeding or difficult dissection planes, it is consistent in the literature that conversion to thoracotomy is the safe next step. Our clinical practice is to attempt VATS or RATS approach for mediastinal cysts when possible. The data used for this review relies heavily on case reports and case series, and thus is the main limitation of this clinical practice review. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9792838 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97928382022-12-28 Surgical approaches to mediastinal cysts: clinical practice review Hsu, Diana S. Banks, Kian C. Velotta, Jeffrey B. Mediastinum Review Article The traditional approach to mediastinal cyst and mass resection has been open via median sternotomy or thoracotomy. With the advent of minimally invasive techniques, there have been successful cases completed via video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) and robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS). Although mediastinal cysts are uncommon, they are a significant and relevant topic in the practice of thoracic surgery. Thus, this clinical practice review aims to summarize and highlight some of the key case series and retrospective studies in order to provide insight on each of the approaches. In addition, there is a brief review of other approaches, such as subxiphoid, and the utility of endobronchial ultrasound in the management of mediastinal cysts. In this review, the identified benefits of VATS and RATS lie largely in quality improvement of the patient experience—decreased length of stay (LOS) and pain—without compromising patient outcomes. However, the open approach remains a viable option, particularly for the management of large cysts or as a bail-out option. When surgeons approach with VATS or RATS and encounter bleeding or difficult dissection planes, it is consistent in the literature that conversion to thoracotomy is the safe next step. Our clinical practice is to attempt VATS or RATS approach for mediastinal cysts when possible. The data used for this review relies heavily on case reports and case series, and thus is the main limitation of this clinical practice review. AME Publishing Company 2022-12-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9792838/ /pubmed/36582973 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/med-22-20 Text en 2022 Mediastinum. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Hsu, Diana S. Banks, Kian C. Velotta, Jeffrey B. Surgical approaches to mediastinal cysts: clinical practice review |
title | Surgical approaches to mediastinal cysts: clinical practice review |
title_full | Surgical approaches to mediastinal cysts: clinical practice review |
title_fullStr | Surgical approaches to mediastinal cysts: clinical practice review |
title_full_unstemmed | Surgical approaches to mediastinal cysts: clinical practice review |
title_short | Surgical approaches to mediastinal cysts: clinical practice review |
title_sort | surgical approaches to mediastinal cysts: clinical practice review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9792838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36582973 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/med-22-20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hsudianas surgicalapproachestomediastinalcystsclinicalpracticereview AT bankskianc surgicalapproachestomediastinalcystsclinicalpracticereview AT velottajeffreyb surgicalapproachestomediastinalcystsclinicalpracticereview |