Cargando…

Five vs. two initial rescue breaths during infant basic life support: A manikin study using bag-mask-ventilation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Children are more likely to suffer a hypoxic-ischaemic cause for cardiac arrest. Early ventilation may provide an advantage in outcome during paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR]. European Resuscitation Council guidelines recommend five initial rescue breaths [IR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Geerts, Anke, Herbelet, Sandrine, Borremans, Gautier, Coppens, Marc, Christiaens-Leysen, Erik, Van de Voorde, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9792851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36582512
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.1067971
_version_ 1784859724481560576
author Geerts, Anke
Herbelet, Sandrine
Borremans, Gautier
Coppens, Marc
Christiaens-Leysen, Erik
Van de Voorde, Patrick
author_facet Geerts, Anke
Herbelet, Sandrine
Borremans, Gautier
Coppens, Marc
Christiaens-Leysen, Erik
Van de Voorde, Patrick
author_sort Geerts, Anke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Children are more likely to suffer a hypoxic-ischaemic cause for cardiac arrest. Early ventilation may provide an advantage in outcome during paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR]. European Resuscitation Council guidelines recommend five initial rescue breaths [IRB] in infants, stemming from the hypothesis that rescuers might need 5 attempts in order to deliver 2 effective ventilations. This study aimed to verify this hypothesis. METHODS: Participants (n = 112, convenience sample) were medical students from the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Ghent University, Belgium. Students were divided into duos and received a 15 min just-in-time training regarding the full CPR-cycle using BMV. Participants then performed five cycles of 2-person CPR. The IRB were given by 1-person BMV, as opposed to a 2-persons technique during the further CPR-cycle. Correct ventilations for the infant were defined as tidal volumes measured (Laerdal® Q-CPR) between 20 and 60 ml, with n = 94 participants included in the analysis. The primary outcome consisted of the difference in the % of medical student duos providing at least 2 effective IRB between 2 and 5 attempts. RESULTS: Off all duos, 55,3% provided correct volumes during their first 2 initial ventilations. An increase up to 72,4% was noticed when allowing 5 ventilations. The proportional difference between 2 and 5 IRB allowed was thus significant [17,0%, 95% confidence interval (5.4; 28.0)]. CONCLUSION: In this manikin study, 5 IRB attempts during infant CPR with BMV increased the success rate in delivering 2 effective ventilations. Besides, students received training emphasizing the need for 5 initial rescue breaths. This study provides evidence supporting European Resuscitation Council guidelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9792851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97928512022-12-28 Five vs. two initial rescue breaths during infant basic life support: A manikin study using bag-mask-ventilation Geerts, Anke Herbelet, Sandrine Borremans, Gautier Coppens, Marc Christiaens-Leysen, Erik Van de Voorde, Patrick Front Pediatr Pediatrics BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Children are more likely to suffer a hypoxic-ischaemic cause for cardiac arrest. Early ventilation may provide an advantage in outcome during paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR]. European Resuscitation Council guidelines recommend five initial rescue breaths [IRB] in infants, stemming from the hypothesis that rescuers might need 5 attempts in order to deliver 2 effective ventilations. This study aimed to verify this hypothesis. METHODS: Participants (n = 112, convenience sample) were medical students from the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Ghent University, Belgium. Students were divided into duos and received a 15 min just-in-time training regarding the full CPR-cycle using BMV. Participants then performed five cycles of 2-person CPR. The IRB were given by 1-person BMV, as opposed to a 2-persons technique during the further CPR-cycle. Correct ventilations for the infant were defined as tidal volumes measured (Laerdal® Q-CPR) between 20 and 60 ml, with n = 94 participants included in the analysis. The primary outcome consisted of the difference in the % of medical student duos providing at least 2 effective IRB between 2 and 5 attempts. RESULTS: Off all duos, 55,3% provided correct volumes during their first 2 initial ventilations. An increase up to 72,4% was noticed when allowing 5 ventilations. The proportional difference between 2 and 5 IRB allowed was thus significant [17,0%, 95% confidence interval (5.4; 28.0)]. CONCLUSION: In this manikin study, 5 IRB attempts during infant CPR with BMV increased the success rate in delivering 2 effective ventilations. Besides, students received training emphasizing the need for 5 initial rescue breaths. This study provides evidence supporting European Resuscitation Council guidelines. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9792851/ /pubmed/36582512 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.1067971 Text en © 2022 Herbelet, Geerts, Borremans, Coppens, Christiaens-Leysen and Van de Voorde. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Geerts, Anke
Herbelet, Sandrine
Borremans, Gautier
Coppens, Marc
Christiaens-Leysen, Erik
Van de Voorde, Patrick
Five vs. two initial rescue breaths during infant basic life support: A manikin study using bag-mask-ventilation
title Five vs. two initial rescue breaths during infant basic life support: A manikin study using bag-mask-ventilation
title_full Five vs. two initial rescue breaths during infant basic life support: A manikin study using bag-mask-ventilation
title_fullStr Five vs. two initial rescue breaths during infant basic life support: A manikin study using bag-mask-ventilation
title_full_unstemmed Five vs. two initial rescue breaths during infant basic life support: A manikin study using bag-mask-ventilation
title_short Five vs. two initial rescue breaths during infant basic life support: A manikin study using bag-mask-ventilation
title_sort five vs. two initial rescue breaths during infant basic life support: a manikin study using bag-mask-ventilation
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9792851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36582512
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.1067971
work_keys_str_mv AT geertsanke fivevstwoinitialrescuebreathsduringinfantbasiclifesupportamanikinstudyusingbagmaskventilation
AT herbeletsandrine fivevstwoinitialrescuebreathsduringinfantbasiclifesupportamanikinstudyusingbagmaskventilation
AT borremansgautier fivevstwoinitialrescuebreathsduringinfantbasiclifesupportamanikinstudyusingbagmaskventilation
AT coppensmarc fivevstwoinitialrescuebreathsduringinfantbasiclifesupportamanikinstudyusingbagmaskventilation
AT christiaensleysenerik fivevstwoinitialrescuebreathsduringinfantbasiclifesupportamanikinstudyusingbagmaskventilation
AT vandevoordepatrick fivevstwoinitialrescuebreathsduringinfantbasiclifesupportamanikinstudyusingbagmaskventilation