Cargando…
Deferasirox versus deferoxamine in managing iron overload in patients with Sickle Cell Anaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVES: To examine the efficacy of deferasirox (DFX) by comparison with deferoxamine (DFO) in managing iron overload in patients with sickle cell anaemia (SCA). METHODS: Online databases were systematically searched for studies published from January 2007 to July 2022 that had investigated the e...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36562113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605221143290 |
_version_ | 1784859769292455936 |
---|---|
author | Qadah, Talal |
author_facet | Qadah, Talal |
author_sort | Qadah, Talal |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To examine the efficacy of deferasirox (DFX) by comparison with deferoxamine (DFO) in managing iron overload in patients with sickle cell anaemia (SCA). METHODS: Online databases were systematically searched for studies published from January 2007 to July 2022 that had investigated the efficacy of DFX compared with DFO in managing iron overload in patients with SCA. RESULTS: Of the 316 articles identified, three randomized clinical trials met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of liver tissue iron concentration (LIC) showed that iron overload was not significantly higher in the DFX group compared with DFO group (WMD, −1.61 mg Fe/g dw (95% CI −4.42 to 1.21). However, iron overload as measured by serum ferritin was significantly lower in DFO compared with DFX group (WMD, 278.13 µg/l (95% CI 36.69 to 519.57). Although meta-analysis was not performed on myocardial iron concentration due to incomplete data, the original report found no significant difference between DFX and DFO. CONCLUSION: While limited by the number of studies included in this meta-analysis, overall, the results tend to show that DFX was as effective as DFO in managing iron overload in patients with SCA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9793042 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97930422022-12-28 Deferasirox versus deferoxamine in managing iron overload in patients with Sickle Cell Anaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis Qadah, Talal J Int Med Res Systematic Review OBJECTIVES: To examine the efficacy of deferasirox (DFX) by comparison with deferoxamine (DFO) in managing iron overload in patients with sickle cell anaemia (SCA). METHODS: Online databases were systematically searched for studies published from January 2007 to July 2022 that had investigated the efficacy of DFX compared with DFO in managing iron overload in patients with SCA. RESULTS: Of the 316 articles identified, three randomized clinical trials met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of liver tissue iron concentration (LIC) showed that iron overload was not significantly higher in the DFX group compared with DFO group (WMD, −1.61 mg Fe/g dw (95% CI −4.42 to 1.21). However, iron overload as measured by serum ferritin was significantly lower in DFO compared with DFX group (WMD, 278.13 µg/l (95% CI 36.69 to 519.57). Although meta-analysis was not performed on myocardial iron concentration due to incomplete data, the original report found no significant difference between DFX and DFO. CONCLUSION: While limited by the number of studies included in this meta-analysis, overall, the results tend to show that DFX was as effective as DFO in managing iron overload in patients with SCA. SAGE Publications 2022-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9793042/ /pubmed/36562113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605221143290 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Qadah, Talal Deferasirox versus deferoxamine in managing iron overload in patients with Sickle Cell Anaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Deferasirox versus deferoxamine in managing iron overload in patients
with Sickle Cell Anaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Deferasirox versus deferoxamine in managing iron overload in patients
with Sickle Cell Anaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Deferasirox versus deferoxamine in managing iron overload in patients
with Sickle Cell Anaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Deferasirox versus deferoxamine in managing iron overload in patients
with Sickle Cell Anaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Deferasirox versus deferoxamine in managing iron overload in patients
with Sickle Cell Anaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | deferasirox versus deferoxamine in managing iron overload in patients
with sickle cell anaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36562113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605221143290 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qadahtalal deferasiroxversusdeferoxamineinmanagingironoverloadinpatientswithsicklecellanaemiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |