Cargando…

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Utility of Fungal Profile Plus Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay in Pulmonary Infections

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary infections due to Aspergillus, Mucorales, and Nocardia have high morbidity and mortality, in part due to diagnostic challenges. Commercially available molecular assays on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) may have increased sensitivity over currently available diagnostic opti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Clarissa B, Shi, Xiaosong, Liesman, Rachael M, Thomas, Laura A, Bahr, Nathan C, Brownback, Kyle R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36578519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac646
_version_ 1784859783091716096
author Smith, Clarissa B
Shi, Xiaosong
Liesman, Rachael M
Thomas, Laura A
Bahr, Nathan C
Brownback, Kyle R
author_facet Smith, Clarissa B
Shi, Xiaosong
Liesman, Rachael M
Thomas, Laura A
Bahr, Nathan C
Brownback, Kyle R
author_sort Smith, Clarissa B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pulmonary infections due to Aspergillus, Mucorales, and Nocardia have high morbidity and mortality, in part due to diagnostic challenges. Commercially available molecular assays on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) may have increased sensitivity over currently available diagnostic options. Our aim was to characterize the diagnostic performance of assays for each of these pathogens in our patient population. METHODS: The medical records of patients whose BALF was tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for Aspergillus, Mucorales, and Nocardia between 2019 and 2021 were reviewed in a cross-sectional manner. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) definitions of “proven,” “probable,” and “possible” infection were used, including histopathology, serology, and culture. We used (1) “proven” or “probable” infection by EORTC criteria, (2) improvement or stabilization on targeted antimicrobial therapy, and (3) absence of a more likely diagnosis as the reference standard. RESULTS: The Aspergillus PCR assay demonstrated the highest agreement with the diagnostic reference standard, with 31.25% (10/32) sensitivity and 97.17% (206/212) specificity. Positive and negative predictive values were 62.50% (10/16) and 90.35% (206/228), respectively. No Mucorales or Nocardia infections were identified by the diagnostic reference standard, so the sensitivity could not be calculated. The specificity of Mucorales and Nocardia targets was 98.35% and 96.69%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrated relatively poor clinical sensitivity for all 3 constituent PCR assays in our patient population, suggesting a limited role for this test in the diagnosis of Aspergillus, Mucorales, or Nocardia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9793098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97930982022-12-27 Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Utility of Fungal Profile Plus Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay in Pulmonary Infections Smith, Clarissa B Shi, Xiaosong Liesman, Rachael M Thomas, Laura A Bahr, Nathan C Brownback, Kyle R Open Forum Infect Dis Major Article BACKGROUND: Pulmonary infections due to Aspergillus, Mucorales, and Nocardia have high morbidity and mortality, in part due to diagnostic challenges. Commercially available molecular assays on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) may have increased sensitivity over currently available diagnostic options. Our aim was to characterize the diagnostic performance of assays for each of these pathogens in our patient population. METHODS: The medical records of patients whose BALF was tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for Aspergillus, Mucorales, and Nocardia between 2019 and 2021 were reviewed in a cross-sectional manner. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) definitions of “proven,” “probable,” and “possible” infection were used, including histopathology, serology, and culture. We used (1) “proven” or “probable” infection by EORTC criteria, (2) improvement or stabilization on targeted antimicrobial therapy, and (3) absence of a more likely diagnosis as the reference standard. RESULTS: The Aspergillus PCR assay demonstrated the highest agreement with the diagnostic reference standard, with 31.25% (10/32) sensitivity and 97.17% (206/212) specificity. Positive and negative predictive values were 62.50% (10/16) and 90.35% (206/228), respectively. No Mucorales or Nocardia infections were identified by the diagnostic reference standard, so the sensitivity could not be calculated. The specificity of Mucorales and Nocardia targets was 98.35% and 96.69%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrated relatively poor clinical sensitivity for all 3 constituent PCR assays in our patient population, suggesting a limited role for this test in the diagnosis of Aspergillus, Mucorales, or Nocardia. Oxford University Press 2022-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9793098/ /pubmed/36578519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac646 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Major Article
Smith, Clarissa B
Shi, Xiaosong
Liesman, Rachael M
Thomas, Laura A
Bahr, Nathan C
Brownback, Kyle R
Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Utility of Fungal Profile Plus Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay in Pulmonary Infections
title Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Utility of Fungal Profile Plus Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay in Pulmonary Infections
title_full Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Utility of Fungal Profile Plus Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay in Pulmonary Infections
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Utility of Fungal Profile Plus Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay in Pulmonary Infections
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Utility of Fungal Profile Plus Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay in Pulmonary Infections
title_short Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Utility of Fungal Profile Plus Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay in Pulmonary Infections
title_sort evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of fungal profile plus polymerase chain reaction assay in pulmonary infections
topic Major Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36578519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac646
work_keys_str_mv AT smithclarissab evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyandclinicalutilityoffungalprofilepluspolymerasechainreactionassayinpulmonaryinfections
AT shixiaosong evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyandclinicalutilityoffungalprofilepluspolymerasechainreactionassayinpulmonaryinfections
AT liesmanrachaelm evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyandclinicalutilityoffungalprofilepluspolymerasechainreactionassayinpulmonaryinfections
AT thomaslauraa evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyandclinicalutilityoffungalprofilepluspolymerasechainreactionassayinpulmonaryinfections
AT bahrnathanc evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyandclinicalutilityoffungalprofilepluspolymerasechainreactionassayinpulmonaryinfections
AT brownbackkyler evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyandclinicalutilityoffungalprofilepluspolymerasechainreactionassayinpulmonaryinfections