Cargando…
Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Utility of Fungal Profile Plus Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay in Pulmonary Infections
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary infections due to Aspergillus, Mucorales, and Nocardia have high morbidity and mortality, in part due to diagnostic challenges. Commercially available molecular assays on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) may have increased sensitivity over currently available diagnostic opti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36578519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac646 |
_version_ | 1784859783091716096 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Clarissa B Shi, Xiaosong Liesman, Rachael M Thomas, Laura A Bahr, Nathan C Brownback, Kyle R |
author_facet | Smith, Clarissa B Shi, Xiaosong Liesman, Rachael M Thomas, Laura A Bahr, Nathan C Brownback, Kyle R |
author_sort | Smith, Clarissa B |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pulmonary infections due to Aspergillus, Mucorales, and Nocardia have high morbidity and mortality, in part due to diagnostic challenges. Commercially available molecular assays on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) may have increased sensitivity over currently available diagnostic options. Our aim was to characterize the diagnostic performance of assays for each of these pathogens in our patient population. METHODS: The medical records of patients whose BALF was tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for Aspergillus, Mucorales, and Nocardia between 2019 and 2021 were reviewed in a cross-sectional manner. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) definitions of “proven,” “probable,” and “possible” infection were used, including histopathology, serology, and culture. We used (1) “proven” or “probable” infection by EORTC criteria, (2) improvement or stabilization on targeted antimicrobial therapy, and (3) absence of a more likely diagnosis as the reference standard. RESULTS: The Aspergillus PCR assay demonstrated the highest agreement with the diagnostic reference standard, with 31.25% (10/32) sensitivity and 97.17% (206/212) specificity. Positive and negative predictive values were 62.50% (10/16) and 90.35% (206/228), respectively. No Mucorales or Nocardia infections were identified by the diagnostic reference standard, so the sensitivity could not be calculated. The specificity of Mucorales and Nocardia targets was 98.35% and 96.69%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrated relatively poor clinical sensitivity for all 3 constituent PCR assays in our patient population, suggesting a limited role for this test in the diagnosis of Aspergillus, Mucorales, or Nocardia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9793098 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97930982022-12-27 Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Utility of Fungal Profile Plus Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay in Pulmonary Infections Smith, Clarissa B Shi, Xiaosong Liesman, Rachael M Thomas, Laura A Bahr, Nathan C Brownback, Kyle R Open Forum Infect Dis Major Article BACKGROUND: Pulmonary infections due to Aspergillus, Mucorales, and Nocardia have high morbidity and mortality, in part due to diagnostic challenges. Commercially available molecular assays on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) may have increased sensitivity over currently available diagnostic options. Our aim was to characterize the diagnostic performance of assays for each of these pathogens in our patient population. METHODS: The medical records of patients whose BALF was tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for Aspergillus, Mucorales, and Nocardia between 2019 and 2021 were reviewed in a cross-sectional manner. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) definitions of “proven,” “probable,” and “possible” infection were used, including histopathology, serology, and culture. We used (1) “proven” or “probable” infection by EORTC criteria, (2) improvement or stabilization on targeted antimicrobial therapy, and (3) absence of a more likely diagnosis as the reference standard. RESULTS: The Aspergillus PCR assay demonstrated the highest agreement with the diagnostic reference standard, with 31.25% (10/32) sensitivity and 97.17% (206/212) specificity. Positive and negative predictive values were 62.50% (10/16) and 90.35% (206/228), respectively. No Mucorales or Nocardia infections were identified by the diagnostic reference standard, so the sensitivity could not be calculated. The specificity of Mucorales and Nocardia targets was 98.35% and 96.69%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrated relatively poor clinical sensitivity for all 3 constituent PCR assays in our patient population, suggesting a limited role for this test in the diagnosis of Aspergillus, Mucorales, or Nocardia. Oxford University Press 2022-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9793098/ /pubmed/36578519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac646 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Major Article Smith, Clarissa B Shi, Xiaosong Liesman, Rachael M Thomas, Laura A Bahr, Nathan C Brownback, Kyle R Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Utility of Fungal Profile Plus Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay in Pulmonary Infections |
title | Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Utility of Fungal Profile Plus Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay in Pulmonary Infections |
title_full | Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Utility of Fungal Profile Plus Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay in Pulmonary Infections |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Utility of Fungal Profile Plus Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay in Pulmonary Infections |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Utility of Fungal Profile Plus Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay in Pulmonary Infections |
title_short | Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Utility of Fungal Profile Plus Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay in Pulmonary Infections |
title_sort | evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of fungal profile plus polymerase chain reaction assay in pulmonary infections |
topic | Major Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36578519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac646 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithclarissab evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyandclinicalutilityoffungalprofilepluspolymerasechainreactionassayinpulmonaryinfections AT shixiaosong evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyandclinicalutilityoffungalprofilepluspolymerasechainreactionassayinpulmonaryinfections AT liesmanrachaelm evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyandclinicalutilityoffungalprofilepluspolymerasechainreactionassayinpulmonaryinfections AT thomaslauraa evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyandclinicalutilityoffungalprofilepluspolymerasechainreactionassayinpulmonaryinfections AT bahrnathanc evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyandclinicalutilityoffungalprofilepluspolymerasechainreactionassayinpulmonaryinfections AT brownbackkyler evaluationofthediagnosticaccuracyandclinicalutilityoffungalprofilepluspolymerasechainreactionassayinpulmonaryinfections |