Cargando…
Free flaps monitoring by Laser-Doppler Flowmetry in head and neck surgery
OBJECTIVE: Early recognition of free flap vascular impairment is essential for flap salvage attempts. Several methods for surveillance of post-operative flaps are available. Among these, we have extensively used Laser-Doppler Perfusion Flowmetry (LDF) monitoring. We report our experience on this top...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Pacini Editore Srl
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36541380 http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N1956 |
_version_ | 1784859793041653760 |
---|---|
author | Salvatori, Pietro Paradisi, Stefano Zani, Andrea |
author_facet | Salvatori, Pietro Paradisi, Stefano Zani, Andrea |
author_sort | Salvatori, Pietro |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Early recognition of free flap vascular impairment is essential for flap salvage attempts. Several methods for surveillance of post-operative flaps are available. Among these, we have extensively used Laser-Doppler Perfusion Flowmetry (LDF) monitoring. We report our experience on this topic and illustrate the advantages and weak points. METHODS: Over seven years, 110 consecutive free flaps for head and neck reconstruction were monitored using the Periflux System 5000(®) (Perimed AB, Järfälla, Sweden). In addition to maximum and minimum peaks, a pattern called vasomotion can be detected. Monitoring time lasted from 3 to 7 days, 24/24 h. RESULTS: Six of 110 (5.5%) cases of vascular problems were detected and clinically confirmed. In 5 cases, venous thrombosis was present: 4 patients were successfully treated. In 1 case, both arterial and venous thrombosis occurred. Flowmetry data always showed a more or less sudden disappearance of vasomotion. CONCLUSIONS: LDF is a highly sensible, specific and reliable method. It is easy to use and interpret at low cost. Remote monitoring could also be developed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9793142 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Pacini Editore Srl |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97931422023-01-06 Free flaps monitoring by Laser-Doppler Flowmetry in head and neck surgery Salvatori, Pietro Paradisi, Stefano Zani, Andrea Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Head and Neck OBJECTIVE: Early recognition of free flap vascular impairment is essential for flap salvage attempts. Several methods for surveillance of post-operative flaps are available. Among these, we have extensively used Laser-Doppler Perfusion Flowmetry (LDF) monitoring. We report our experience on this topic and illustrate the advantages and weak points. METHODS: Over seven years, 110 consecutive free flaps for head and neck reconstruction were monitored using the Periflux System 5000(®) (Perimed AB, Järfälla, Sweden). In addition to maximum and minimum peaks, a pattern called vasomotion can be detected. Monitoring time lasted from 3 to 7 days, 24/24 h. RESULTS: Six of 110 (5.5%) cases of vascular problems were detected and clinically confirmed. In 5 cases, venous thrombosis was present: 4 patients were successfully treated. In 1 case, both arterial and venous thrombosis occurred. Flowmetry data always showed a more or less sudden disappearance of vasomotion. CONCLUSIONS: LDF is a highly sensible, specific and reliable method. It is easy to use and interpret at low cost. Remote monitoring could also be developed. Pacini Editore Srl 2022-10-31 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9793142/ /pubmed/36541380 http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N1956 Text en Società Italiana di Otorinolaringoiatria e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale, Rome, Italy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the CC-BY-NC-ND (Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International) license. The article can be used by giving appropriate credit and mentioning the license, but only for non-commercial purposes and only in the original version. For further information: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en |
spellingShingle | Head and Neck Salvatori, Pietro Paradisi, Stefano Zani, Andrea Free flaps monitoring by Laser-Doppler Flowmetry in head and neck surgery |
title | Free flaps monitoring by Laser-Doppler Flowmetry in head and neck surgery |
title_full | Free flaps monitoring by Laser-Doppler Flowmetry in head and neck surgery |
title_fullStr | Free flaps monitoring by Laser-Doppler Flowmetry in head and neck surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Free flaps monitoring by Laser-Doppler Flowmetry in head and neck surgery |
title_short | Free flaps monitoring by Laser-Doppler Flowmetry in head and neck surgery |
title_sort | free flaps monitoring by laser-doppler flowmetry in head and neck surgery |
topic | Head and Neck |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36541380 http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N1956 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT salvatoripietro freeflapsmonitoringbylaserdopplerflowmetryinheadandnecksurgery AT paradisistefano freeflapsmonitoringbylaserdopplerflowmetryinheadandnecksurgery AT zaniandrea freeflapsmonitoringbylaserdopplerflowmetryinheadandnecksurgery |