Cargando…

Minimally invasive carpal tunnel release: A clinical case study and surgical technique

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most prevalent type of median nerve entrapment neuropathy. CTR surgery with a single limited incision is becoming more widely accepted. A better recovery, less pillar pain, less scarring, and an earlier return to work are the key benef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wongsiri, Sunton, Sarasombath, Peem, Liawrungrueang, Wongthawat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36582854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104950
_version_ 1784859802481983488
author Wongsiri, Sunton
Sarasombath, Peem
Liawrungrueang, Wongthawat
author_facet Wongsiri, Sunton
Sarasombath, Peem
Liawrungrueang, Wongthawat
author_sort Wongsiri, Sunton
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most prevalent type of median nerve entrapment neuropathy. CTR surgery with a single limited incision is becoming more widely accepted. A better recovery, less pillar pain, less scarring, and an earlier return to work are the key benefits of single limited incision. This study provides an inquiry report on the surgical method, surgical advice, and outcomes of single limited incision minimally invasive carpal tunnel release for CTS. CASE PRESENTATION: A 60-year-old female developed carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Patient received minimally invasive carpal tunnel release using single limited incision following the failure non operative treatment and the patient was able to return to work with excellent 1-year outcomes. The patient was extremely satisfied with this operative technique. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: This case highlights a successful outcome of a minimal invasive surgery in CTS. Visual efficiency during surgery and full transverse carpal ligament release are both improved with this technique which requires only a single limited incision. The transverse carpal ligament is totally released with this approach. During the operation, median nerves and superficial palmar arches are not injured. CONCLUSION: This technique has been shown to be effective and safe for minimal invasive surgery. This technique could be of interest to surgeons performing minimal invasive surgery who treat CTS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9793183
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97931832022-12-28 Minimally invasive carpal tunnel release: A clinical case study and surgical technique Wongsiri, Sunton Sarasombath, Peem Liawrungrueang, Wongthawat Ann Med Surg (Lond) Technical Note INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most prevalent type of median nerve entrapment neuropathy. CTR surgery with a single limited incision is becoming more widely accepted. A better recovery, less pillar pain, less scarring, and an earlier return to work are the key benefits of single limited incision. This study provides an inquiry report on the surgical method, surgical advice, and outcomes of single limited incision minimally invasive carpal tunnel release for CTS. CASE PRESENTATION: A 60-year-old female developed carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Patient received minimally invasive carpal tunnel release using single limited incision following the failure non operative treatment and the patient was able to return to work with excellent 1-year outcomes. The patient was extremely satisfied with this operative technique. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: This case highlights a successful outcome of a minimal invasive surgery in CTS. Visual efficiency during surgery and full transverse carpal ligament release are both improved with this technique which requires only a single limited incision. The transverse carpal ligament is totally released with this approach. During the operation, median nerves and superficial palmar arches are not injured. CONCLUSION: This technique has been shown to be effective and safe for minimal invasive surgery. This technique could be of interest to surgeons performing minimal invasive surgery who treat CTS. Elsevier 2022-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9793183/ /pubmed/36582854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104950 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Technical Note
Wongsiri, Sunton
Sarasombath, Peem
Liawrungrueang, Wongthawat
Minimally invasive carpal tunnel release: A clinical case study and surgical technique
title Minimally invasive carpal tunnel release: A clinical case study and surgical technique
title_full Minimally invasive carpal tunnel release: A clinical case study and surgical technique
title_fullStr Minimally invasive carpal tunnel release: A clinical case study and surgical technique
title_full_unstemmed Minimally invasive carpal tunnel release: A clinical case study and surgical technique
title_short Minimally invasive carpal tunnel release: A clinical case study and surgical technique
title_sort minimally invasive carpal tunnel release: a clinical case study and surgical technique
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36582854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104950
work_keys_str_mv AT wongsirisunton minimallyinvasivecarpaltunnelreleaseaclinicalcasestudyandsurgicaltechnique
AT sarasombathpeem minimallyinvasivecarpaltunnelreleaseaclinicalcasestudyandsurgicaltechnique
AT liawrungrueangwongthawat minimallyinvasivecarpaltunnelreleaseaclinicalcasestudyandsurgicaltechnique