Cargando…
Validity and reliability of inertial measurement units measurements for running kinematics in different foot strike pattern runners
This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the three-dimensional joint kinematic outcomes obtained by the inertial measurement units (IMUs) for runners with rearfoot strike pattern (RFS) and non-rearfoot strike pattern (NRFS). The IMUs system and optical motion capture system were us...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36582839 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.1005496 |
_version_ | 1784859816407072768 |
---|---|
author | Zeng, Ziwei Liu, Yue Li, Pan Wang, Lin |
author_facet | Zeng, Ziwei Liu, Yue Li, Pan Wang, Lin |
author_sort | Zeng, Ziwei |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the three-dimensional joint kinematic outcomes obtained by the inertial measurement units (IMUs) for runners with rearfoot strike pattern (RFS) and non-rearfoot strike pattern (NRFS). The IMUs system and optical motion capture system were used to simultaneous collect 3D kinematic of lower extremity joint data from participants running at 12 km/h. The joint angle waveforms showed a high correlation between the two systems after the offset correction in the sagittal plane (NRFS: coefficient of multiple correlation (CMC) = 0.924–0.968, root mean square error (RMSE) = 4.6(°)–13.7(°); RFS: CMC = 0.930–0.965, RMSE = 3.1(°)–7.7(°)), but revealed high variability in the frontal and transverse planes (NRFS: CMC = 0.924–0.968, RMSE = 4.6°–13.7°; RFS: CMC = 0.930–0.965, RMSE = 3.1°–7.7°). The between-rater and between-day reliability were shown to be very good to excellent in the sagittal plane (between-rater: NRFS: CMC = 0.967–0.975, RMSE = 1.9°–2.9°, RFS: CMC = 0.922–0.989, RMSE = 1.0°–2.5°; between-day: NRFS: CMC = 0.950–0.978, RMSE = 1.6°–2.7°, RFS: CMC = 0.920–0.989, RMSE = 1.7°–2.2°), whereas the reliability was weak to very good (between-rater: NRFS: CMC = 0.480–0.947, RMSE = 1.1°–2.7°, RFS: CMC = 0.646–0.873, RMSE = 0.7°–2.4°; between-day: NRFS: CMC = 0.666–0.867, RMSE = 0.7°–2.8°, RFS: CMC = 0.321–0.805, RMSE = 0.9°–5.0°) in the frontal and transverse planes across all joints in both types of runners. The IMUs system was a feasible tool for measuring lower extremity joint kinematics in the sagittal plane during running, especially for RFS runners. However, the joint kinematics data in frontal and transverse planes derived by the IMUs system need to be used with caution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9793257 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97932572022-12-28 Validity and reliability of inertial measurement units measurements for running kinematics in different foot strike pattern runners Zeng, Ziwei Liu, Yue Li, Pan Wang, Lin Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the three-dimensional joint kinematic outcomes obtained by the inertial measurement units (IMUs) for runners with rearfoot strike pattern (RFS) and non-rearfoot strike pattern (NRFS). The IMUs system and optical motion capture system were used to simultaneous collect 3D kinematic of lower extremity joint data from participants running at 12 km/h. The joint angle waveforms showed a high correlation between the two systems after the offset correction in the sagittal plane (NRFS: coefficient of multiple correlation (CMC) = 0.924–0.968, root mean square error (RMSE) = 4.6(°)–13.7(°); RFS: CMC = 0.930–0.965, RMSE = 3.1(°)–7.7(°)), but revealed high variability in the frontal and transverse planes (NRFS: CMC = 0.924–0.968, RMSE = 4.6°–13.7°; RFS: CMC = 0.930–0.965, RMSE = 3.1°–7.7°). The between-rater and between-day reliability were shown to be very good to excellent in the sagittal plane (between-rater: NRFS: CMC = 0.967–0.975, RMSE = 1.9°–2.9°, RFS: CMC = 0.922–0.989, RMSE = 1.0°–2.5°; between-day: NRFS: CMC = 0.950–0.978, RMSE = 1.6°–2.7°, RFS: CMC = 0.920–0.989, RMSE = 1.7°–2.2°), whereas the reliability was weak to very good (between-rater: NRFS: CMC = 0.480–0.947, RMSE = 1.1°–2.7°, RFS: CMC = 0.646–0.873, RMSE = 0.7°–2.4°; between-day: NRFS: CMC = 0.666–0.867, RMSE = 0.7°–2.8°, RFS: CMC = 0.321–0.805, RMSE = 0.9°–5.0°) in the frontal and transverse planes across all joints in both types of runners. The IMUs system was a feasible tool for measuring lower extremity joint kinematics in the sagittal plane during running, especially for RFS runners. However, the joint kinematics data in frontal and transverse planes derived by the IMUs system need to be used with caution. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9793257/ /pubmed/36582839 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.1005496 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zeng, Liu, Li and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Bioengineering and Biotechnology Zeng, Ziwei Liu, Yue Li, Pan Wang, Lin Validity and reliability of inertial measurement units measurements for running kinematics in different foot strike pattern runners |
title | Validity and reliability of inertial measurement units measurements for running kinematics in different foot strike pattern runners |
title_full | Validity and reliability of inertial measurement units measurements for running kinematics in different foot strike pattern runners |
title_fullStr | Validity and reliability of inertial measurement units measurements for running kinematics in different foot strike pattern runners |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity and reliability of inertial measurement units measurements for running kinematics in different foot strike pattern runners |
title_short | Validity and reliability of inertial measurement units measurements for running kinematics in different foot strike pattern runners |
title_sort | validity and reliability of inertial measurement units measurements for running kinematics in different foot strike pattern runners |
topic | Bioengineering and Biotechnology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36582839 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.1005496 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zengziwei validityandreliabilityofinertialmeasurementunitsmeasurementsforrunningkinematicsindifferentfootstrikepatternrunners AT liuyue validityandreliabilityofinertialmeasurementunitsmeasurementsforrunningkinematicsindifferentfootstrikepatternrunners AT lipan validityandreliabilityofinertialmeasurementunitsmeasurementsforrunningkinematicsindifferentfootstrikepatternrunners AT wanglin validityandreliabilityofinertialmeasurementunitsmeasurementsforrunningkinematicsindifferentfootstrikepatternrunners |