Cargando…

The effect of noisome preparation methods in encapsulating 5-fluorouracil and real time cell assay against HCT-116 colon cancer cell line

The formulation of niosomes is influenced by a number of variables, and these variables may eventually affect the formulation’s outcome. One of the elements that can influence the physico-chemical properties of niosomes is the method used in preparation of the formulation. In this study, we establis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ugorji, Onyinyechi Lydia, Umeh, Ogochukwu Ngozi Chidimma, Agubata, Chukwuma Obumneme, Adah, Dickson, Obitte, Nicholas Chinedu, Chukwu, Amarauche
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36582708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12369
_version_ 1784859823071821824
author Ugorji, Onyinyechi Lydia
Umeh, Ogochukwu Ngozi Chidimma
Agubata, Chukwuma Obumneme
Adah, Dickson
Obitte, Nicholas Chinedu
Chukwu, Amarauche
author_facet Ugorji, Onyinyechi Lydia
Umeh, Ogochukwu Ngozi Chidimma
Agubata, Chukwuma Obumneme
Adah, Dickson
Obitte, Nicholas Chinedu
Chukwu, Amarauche
author_sort Ugorji, Onyinyechi Lydia
collection PubMed
description The formulation of niosomes is influenced by a number of variables, and these variables may eventually affect the formulation’s outcome. One of the elements that can influence the physico-chemical properties of niosomes is the method used in preparation of the formulation. In this study, we established if various methods of preparation have any impact on the prepared vesicles when loaded with 5-fluorouracil. Thereafter, a real-time cell assay (an in vitro cytotoxicity test) against HCT-116 colon cancer cell lines was done on an optimised batch. 5-fluorouracil loaded niosomes were prepared with either Tween 60 or Span 60 by four different methods - namely thin film hydration (TFH), reverse phase evaporation (RPE), evaporation/sonication (EVP/SON), and the ethanol injection method (EIM). In vitro evaluations were done on the formulations, and these included particle size analysis, entrapment efficiency, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), photomicrography, drug release, polydispersity index, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The effects of the preparation method and type of non-ionic surfactants on encapsulation efficiency, particle size, and in vitro drug release of the niosomes at pH 7.4 were evaluated. An in vitro cytotoxicity test (real time cell assay (RTCA)) against HCT-116 cells was carried out using the optimised formulation. Results showed physically stable formulations. The TFH method produced the smallest particle sizes (187 nm and 482 nm), while the EVP/SON method produced the largest particle sizes (4476 nm and 9111 nm). The Tween-based niosomes prepared by TFH or RPE had higher drug entrapment. The FTIR studies of niosomal formulations showed broad peaks at wavenumbers above 3000 cm(−1), indicating strong hydrogen bonds. The RTCA showed 5-fluorouracil-loaded niosomes caused more sustained cell death compared to the pure drug and blank niosomes. The methods of preparation affected the particle size, polydispersity index, entrapment efficiency, and the physical stability of the vesicles. The thin film hydration method was more robust in the entrapped 5-fluorouracil and showed lower particle sizes when compared to all the other methods. RTCA showed sustained cell death in real time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9793284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97932842022-12-28 The effect of noisome preparation methods in encapsulating 5-fluorouracil and real time cell assay against HCT-116 colon cancer cell line Ugorji, Onyinyechi Lydia Umeh, Ogochukwu Ngozi Chidimma Agubata, Chukwuma Obumneme Adah, Dickson Obitte, Nicholas Chinedu Chukwu, Amarauche Heliyon Research Article The formulation of niosomes is influenced by a number of variables, and these variables may eventually affect the formulation’s outcome. One of the elements that can influence the physico-chemical properties of niosomes is the method used in preparation of the formulation. In this study, we established if various methods of preparation have any impact on the prepared vesicles when loaded with 5-fluorouracil. Thereafter, a real-time cell assay (an in vitro cytotoxicity test) against HCT-116 colon cancer cell lines was done on an optimised batch. 5-fluorouracil loaded niosomes were prepared with either Tween 60 or Span 60 by four different methods - namely thin film hydration (TFH), reverse phase evaporation (RPE), evaporation/sonication (EVP/SON), and the ethanol injection method (EIM). In vitro evaluations were done on the formulations, and these included particle size analysis, entrapment efficiency, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), photomicrography, drug release, polydispersity index, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The effects of the preparation method and type of non-ionic surfactants on encapsulation efficiency, particle size, and in vitro drug release of the niosomes at pH 7.4 were evaluated. An in vitro cytotoxicity test (real time cell assay (RTCA)) against HCT-116 cells was carried out using the optimised formulation. Results showed physically stable formulations. The TFH method produced the smallest particle sizes (187 nm and 482 nm), while the EVP/SON method produced the largest particle sizes (4476 nm and 9111 nm). The Tween-based niosomes prepared by TFH or RPE had higher drug entrapment. The FTIR studies of niosomal formulations showed broad peaks at wavenumbers above 3000 cm(−1), indicating strong hydrogen bonds. The RTCA showed 5-fluorouracil-loaded niosomes caused more sustained cell death compared to the pure drug and blank niosomes. The methods of preparation affected the particle size, polydispersity index, entrapment efficiency, and the physical stability of the vesicles. The thin film hydration method was more robust in the entrapped 5-fluorouracil and showed lower particle sizes when compared to all the other methods. RTCA showed sustained cell death in real time. Elsevier 2022-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9793284/ /pubmed/36582708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12369 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Ugorji, Onyinyechi Lydia
Umeh, Ogochukwu Ngozi Chidimma
Agubata, Chukwuma Obumneme
Adah, Dickson
Obitte, Nicholas Chinedu
Chukwu, Amarauche
The effect of noisome preparation methods in encapsulating 5-fluorouracil and real time cell assay against HCT-116 colon cancer cell line
title The effect of noisome preparation methods in encapsulating 5-fluorouracil and real time cell assay against HCT-116 colon cancer cell line
title_full The effect of noisome preparation methods in encapsulating 5-fluorouracil and real time cell assay against HCT-116 colon cancer cell line
title_fullStr The effect of noisome preparation methods in encapsulating 5-fluorouracil and real time cell assay against HCT-116 colon cancer cell line
title_full_unstemmed The effect of noisome preparation methods in encapsulating 5-fluorouracil and real time cell assay against HCT-116 colon cancer cell line
title_short The effect of noisome preparation methods in encapsulating 5-fluorouracil and real time cell assay against HCT-116 colon cancer cell line
title_sort effect of noisome preparation methods in encapsulating 5-fluorouracil and real time cell assay against hct-116 colon cancer cell line
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36582708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12369
work_keys_str_mv AT ugorjionyinyechilydia theeffectofnoisomepreparationmethodsinencapsulating5fluorouracilandrealtimecellassayagainsthct116coloncancercellline
AT umehogochukwungozichidimma theeffectofnoisomepreparationmethodsinencapsulating5fluorouracilandrealtimecellassayagainsthct116coloncancercellline
AT agubatachukwumaobumneme theeffectofnoisomepreparationmethodsinencapsulating5fluorouracilandrealtimecellassayagainsthct116coloncancercellline
AT adahdickson theeffectofnoisomepreparationmethodsinencapsulating5fluorouracilandrealtimecellassayagainsthct116coloncancercellline
AT obittenicholaschinedu theeffectofnoisomepreparationmethodsinencapsulating5fluorouracilandrealtimecellassayagainsthct116coloncancercellline
AT chukwuamarauche theeffectofnoisomepreparationmethodsinencapsulating5fluorouracilandrealtimecellassayagainsthct116coloncancercellline
AT ugorjionyinyechilydia effectofnoisomepreparationmethodsinencapsulating5fluorouracilandrealtimecellassayagainsthct116coloncancercellline
AT umehogochukwungozichidimma effectofnoisomepreparationmethodsinencapsulating5fluorouracilandrealtimecellassayagainsthct116coloncancercellline
AT agubatachukwumaobumneme effectofnoisomepreparationmethodsinencapsulating5fluorouracilandrealtimecellassayagainsthct116coloncancercellline
AT adahdickson effectofnoisomepreparationmethodsinencapsulating5fluorouracilandrealtimecellassayagainsthct116coloncancercellline
AT obittenicholaschinedu effectofnoisomepreparationmethodsinencapsulating5fluorouracilandrealtimecellassayagainsthct116coloncancercellline
AT chukwuamarauche effectofnoisomepreparationmethodsinencapsulating5fluorouracilandrealtimecellassayagainsthct116coloncancercellline