Cargando…
Pandemic Preference Shocks and Inflation in a New Keynesian Model
This paper examines two types of preference shocks, shocks to the disutility of working and to the demand for goods relative to services, in an otherwise standard New Keynesian model. Existing literature has primarily focused on productivity and monetary shocks as driving processes. The contribution...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36590746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11293-022-09752-7 |
_version_ | 1784859841235255296 |
---|---|
author | Craighead, William D. |
author_facet | Craighead, William D. |
author_sort | Craighead, William D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper examines two types of preference shocks, shocks to the disutility of working and to the demand for goods relative to services, in an otherwise standard New Keynesian model. Existing literature has primarily focused on productivity and monetary shocks as driving processes. The contribution of this paper is to construct model-based processes for both types of preference shocks using United States data over 1948–2022 from the Bureau of Economic Analysis and Bureau of Labor Statistics and investigate the resulting dynamics in the New Keynesian framework. Constructing historical processes for the shocks provides context for examining the shifts that occurred during the coronavirus pandemic. Both preference shocks show movements of unprecedented magnitude that coincide with the pandemic. In the model, the relative demand shock leads to opposite movements in inflation and labor between the two sectors, while the shock to labor disutility is stagflationary, with inflation rising and output decreasing. A pandemic-motivated experiment with simultaneous large shocks to both labor disutility and relative goods demand generates divergences between the sectors in inflation and labor, but higher inflation and reduced output overall. This demonstrates that preference shocks may be useful for understanding the pandemic-era economy and suggests that they deserve more attention from economists and policymakers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11293-022-09752-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9793379 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97933792022-12-27 Pandemic Preference Shocks and Inflation in a New Keynesian Model Craighead, William D. Atl Econ J Article This paper examines two types of preference shocks, shocks to the disutility of working and to the demand for goods relative to services, in an otherwise standard New Keynesian model. Existing literature has primarily focused on productivity and monetary shocks as driving processes. The contribution of this paper is to construct model-based processes for both types of preference shocks using United States data over 1948–2022 from the Bureau of Economic Analysis and Bureau of Labor Statistics and investigate the resulting dynamics in the New Keynesian framework. Constructing historical processes for the shocks provides context for examining the shifts that occurred during the coronavirus pandemic. Both preference shocks show movements of unprecedented magnitude that coincide with the pandemic. In the model, the relative demand shock leads to opposite movements in inflation and labor between the two sectors, while the shock to labor disutility is stagflationary, with inflation rising and output decreasing. A pandemic-motivated experiment with simultaneous large shocks to both labor disutility and relative goods demand generates divergences between the sectors in inflation and labor, but higher inflation and reduced output overall. This demonstrates that preference shocks may be useful for understanding the pandemic-era economy and suggests that they deserve more attention from economists and policymakers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11293-022-09752-7. Springer US 2022-12-27 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9793379/ /pubmed/36590746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11293-022-09752-7 Text en © International Atlantic Economic Society 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Craighead, William D. Pandemic Preference Shocks and Inflation in a New Keynesian Model |
title | Pandemic Preference Shocks and Inflation in a New Keynesian Model |
title_full | Pandemic Preference Shocks and Inflation in a New Keynesian Model |
title_fullStr | Pandemic Preference Shocks and Inflation in a New Keynesian Model |
title_full_unstemmed | Pandemic Preference Shocks and Inflation in a New Keynesian Model |
title_short | Pandemic Preference Shocks and Inflation in a New Keynesian Model |
title_sort | pandemic preference shocks and inflation in a new keynesian model |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36590746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11293-022-09752-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT craigheadwilliamd pandemicpreferenceshocksandinflationinanewkeynesianmodel |