Cargando…

The impact of baseline (18)F-FDG PET-CT on the management and outcome of patients with gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE: CT and staging laparoscopy are routinely used to stage patients with gastric cancer, however the role of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) combined with CT (PET-CT) is uncertain. This systematic review synthesised the evidence regarding the impact of baseli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foley, Kieran G, Coomer, Will, Coles, Bernadette, Bradley, Kevin M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36129138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220437
_version_ 1784859853810827264
author Foley, Kieran G
Coomer, Will
Coles, Bernadette
Bradley, Kevin M
author_facet Foley, Kieran G
Coomer, Will
Coles, Bernadette
Bradley, Kevin M
author_sort Foley, Kieran G
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: CT and staging laparoscopy are routinely used to stage patients with gastric cancer, however the role of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) combined with CT (PET-CT) is uncertain. This systematic review synthesised the evidence regarding the impact of baseline PET-CT staging on treatment decisions and patient outcomes. METHODS: Systematic database searches were performed without date restriction. Studies reporting data in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent radiological staging were included. One reviewer screened titles and abstracts for suitability and two reviewers extracted data from included articles. Primary outcome was the reported change in management after PET-CT. Secondary outcomes were the rates of recurrence and overall survival between patients staged with and without PET-CT. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. PROSPERO registration (CRD42022304314). RESULTS: Data from 11 studies recruiting 2101 patients between 2012 and 2021 were included. PET-CT was performed in 1422 patients. Change of management varied between 3% and 29% of cases. No studies compared recurrence or survival rates between patients staged with or without PET-CT. Adenocarcinoma of intestinal subtype tended to be more FDG-avid compared to diffuse or signet-ring subtypes. No randomised data existed, and studies were considered low quality with high risk of bias. CONCLUSION: Evidence for the additional value of PET-CT in the gastric cancer staging pathway is limited. All studies reported a positive impact by preventing those with undetected metastatic disease on CT undergoing futile surgery. Future national guidelines should consider routine staging PET-CT in gastric cancer. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Studies indicated that FDG PET-CT added benefit in gastric cancer staging by detecting more distant metastases, but these studies were generally of low quality and at high risk of bias. Intestinal subtype of gastric adenocarcinoma tended to be more FDG-avid and therefore more distant metastases were subsequently detected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9793476
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97934762023-01-06 The impact of baseline (18)F-FDG PET-CT on the management and outcome of patients with gastric cancer Foley, Kieran G Coomer, Will Coles, Bernadette Bradley, Kevin M Br J Radiol Systematic Review OBJECTIVE: CT and staging laparoscopy are routinely used to stage patients with gastric cancer, however the role of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) combined with CT (PET-CT) is uncertain. This systematic review synthesised the evidence regarding the impact of baseline PET-CT staging on treatment decisions and patient outcomes. METHODS: Systematic database searches were performed without date restriction. Studies reporting data in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent radiological staging were included. One reviewer screened titles and abstracts for suitability and two reviewers extracted data from included articles. Primary outcome was the reported change in management after PET-CT. Secondary outcomes were the rates of recurrence and overall survival between patients staged with and without PET-CT. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. PROSPERO registration (CRD42022304314). RESULTS: Data from 11 studies recruiting 2101 patients between 2012 and 2021 were included. PET-CT was performed in 1422 patients. Change of management varied between 3% and 29% of cases. No studies compared recurrence or survival rates between patients staged with or without PET-CT. Adenocarcinoma of intestinal subtype tended to be more FDG-avid compared to diffuse or signet-ring subtypes. No randomised data existed, and studies were considered low quality with high risk of bias. CONCLUSION: Evidence for the additional value of PET-CT in the gastric cancer staging pathway is limited. All studies reported a positive impact by preventing those with undetected metastatic disease on CT undergoing futile surgery. Future national guidelines should consider routine staging PET-CT in gastric cancer. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Studies indicated that FDG PET-CT added benefit in gastric cancer staging by detecting more distant metastases, but these studies were generally of low quality and at high risk of bias. Intestinal subtype of gastric adenocarcinoma tended to be more FDG-avid and therefore more distant metastases were subsequently detected. The British Institute of Radiology. 2022-11-01 2022-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9793476/ /pubmed/36129138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220437 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Foley, Kieran G
Coomer, Will
Coles, Bernadette
Bradley, Kevin M
The impact of baseline (18)F-FDG PET-CT on the management and outcome of patients with gastric cancer
title The impact of baseline (18)F-FDG PET-CT on the management and outcome of patients with gastric cancer
title_full The impact of baseline (18)F-FDG PET-CT on the management and outcome of patients with gastric cancer
title_fullStr The impact of baseline (18)F-FDG PET-CT on the management and outcome of patients with gastric cancer
title_full_unstemmed The impact of baseline (18)F-FDG PET-CT on the management and outcome of patients with gastric cancer
title_short The impact of baseline (18)F-FDG PET-CT on the management and outcome of patients with gastric cancer
title_sort impact of baseline (18)f-fdg pet-ct on the management and outcome of patients with gastric cancer
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36129138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220437
work_keys_str_mv AT foleykierang theimpactofbaseline18ffdgpetctonthemanagementandoutcomeofpatientswithgastriccancer
AT coomerwill theimpactofbaseline18ffdgpetctonthemanagementandoutcomeofpatientswithgastriccancer
AT colesbernadette theimpactofbaseline18ffdgpetctonthemanagementandoutcomeofpatientswithgastriccancer
AT bradleykevinm theimpactofbaseline18ffdgpetctonthemanagementandoutcomeofpatientswithgastriccancer
AT foleykierang impactofbaseline18ffdgpetctonthemanagementandoutcomeofpatientswithgastriccancer
AT coomerwill impactofbaseline18ffdgpetctonthemanagementandoutcomeofpatientswithgastriccancer
AT colesbernadette impactofbaseline18ffdgpetctonthemanagementandoutcomeofpatientswithgastriccancer
AT bradleykevinm impactofbaseline18ffdgpetctonthemanagementandoutcomeofpatientswithgastriccancer