Cargando…

Predictive value of CAC score combined with clinical features for obstructive coronary heart disease on coronary computed tomography angiography: a machine learning method

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the predictive value of clinical factors combined with coronary artery calcium (CAC) score based on a machine learning method for obstructive coronary heart disease (CAD) on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in individuals with atypical chest pain. METHODS: T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ren, Yongkui, Li, Yulin, Pan, Weili, Yin, Da, Du, Jie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36572879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-03022-9
_version_ 1784859867188559872
author Ren, Yongkui
Li, Yulin
Pan, Weili
Yin, Da
Du, Jie
author_facet Ren, Yongkui
Li, Yulin
Pan, Weili
Yin, Da
Du, Jie
author_sort Ren, Yongkui
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We investigated the predictive value of clinical factors combined with coronary artery calcium (CAC) score based on a machine learning method for obstructive coronary heart disease (CAD) on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in individuals with atypical chest pain. METHODS: The study included data from 1,906 individuals undergoing CCTA and CAC scanning because of atypical chest pain and without evidence for the previous CAD. A total of 63 variables including traditional cardiovascular risk factors, CAC score, laboratory results, and imaging parameters were used to build the Random forests (RF) model. Among all the participants, 70% were randomly selected to train the models on which fivefold cross-validation was done and the remaining 30% were regarded as a validation set. The prediction performance of the RF model was compared with two traditional logistic regression (LR) models. RESULTS: The incidence of obstructive CAD was 16.4%. The area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) for obstructive CAD of the RF model was 0.841 (95% CI 0.820–0.860), the CACS model was 0.746 (95% CI 0.722–0.769), and the clinical model was 0.810 (95% CI 0.788–0.831). The RF model was significantly superior to the other two models (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the calibration curve and Hosmer–Lemeshow test showed that the RF model had good classification performance (p = 0.556). CAC score, age, glucose, homocysteine, and neutrophil were the top five important variables in the RF model. CONCLUSION: RF model was superior to the traditional models in the prediction of obstructive CAD. In clinical practice, the RF model may improve risk stratification and optimize individual management. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-022-03022-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9793556
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97935562022-12-28 Predictive value of CAC score combined with clinical features for obstructive coronary heart disease on coronary computed tomography angiography: a machine learning method Ren, Yongkui Li, Yulin Pan, Weili Yin, Da Du, Jie BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research OBJECTIVE: We investigated the predictive value of clinical factors combined with coronary artery calcium (CAC) score based on a machine learning method for obstructive coronary heart disease (CAD) on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in individuals with atypical chest pain. METHODS: The study included data from 1,906 individuals undergoing CCTA and CAC scanning because of atypical chest pain and without evidence for the previous CAD. A total of 63 variables including traditional cardiovascular risk factors, CAC score, laboratory results, and imaging parameters were used to build the Random forests (RF) model. Among all the participants, 70% were randomly selected to train the models on which fivefold cross-validation was done and the remaining 30% were regarded as a validation set. The prediction performance of the RF model was compared with two traditional logistic regression (LR) models. RESULTS: The incidence of obstructive CAD was 16.4%. The area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) for obstructive CAD of the RF model was 0.841 (95% CI 0.820–0.860), the CACS model was 0.746 (95% CI 0.722–0.769), and the clinical model was 0.810 (95% CI 0.788–0.831). The RF model was significantly superior to the other two models (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the calibration curve and Hosmer–Lemeshow test showed that the RF model had good classification performance (p = 0.556). CAC score, age, glucose, homocysteine, and neutrophil were the top five important variables in the RF model. CONCLUSION: RF model was superior to the traditional models in the prediction of obstructive CAD. In clinical practice, the RF model may improve risk stratification and optimize individual management. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-022-03022-9. BioMed Central 2022-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9793556/ /pubmed/36572879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-03022-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ren, Yongkui
Li, Yulin
Pan, Weili
Yin, Da
Du, Jie
Predictive value of CAC score combined with clinical features for obstructive coronary heart disease on coronary computed tomography angiography: a machine learning method
title Predictive value of CAC score combined with clinical features for obstructive coronary heart disease on coronary computed tomography angiography: a machine learning method
title_full Predictive value of CAC score combined with clinical features for obstructive coronary heart disease on coronary computed tomography angiography: a machine learning method
title_fullStr Predictive value of CAC score combined with clinical features for obstructive coronary heart disease on coronary computed tomography angiography: a machine learning method
title_full_unstemmed Predictive value of CAC score combined with clinical features for obstructive coronary heart disease on coronary computed tomography angiography: a machine learning method
title_short Predictive value of CAC score combined with clinical features for obstructive coronary heart disease on coronary computed tomography angiography: a machine learning method
title_sort predictive value of cac score combined with clinical features for obstructive coronary heart disease on coronary computed tomography angiography: a machine learning method
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36572879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-03022-9
work_keys_str_mv AT renyongkui predictivevalueofcacscorecombinedwithclinicalfeaturesforobstructivecoronaryheartdiseaseoncoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyamachinelearningmethod
AT liyulin predictivevalueofcacscorecombinedwithclinicalfeaturesforobstructivecoronaryheartdiseaseoncoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyamachinelearningmethod
AT panweili predictivevalueofcacscorecombinedwithclinicalfeaturesforobstructivecoronaryheartdiseaseoncoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyamachinelearningmethod
AT yinda predictivevalueofcacscorecombinedwithclinicalfeaturesforobstructivecoronaryheartdiseaseoncoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyamachinelearningmethod
AT dujie predictivevalueofcacscorecombinedwithclinicalfeaturesforobstructivecoronaryheartdiseaseoncoronarycomputedtomographyangiographyamachinelearningmethod