Cargando…

A good use of time? Providing evidence for how effort is invested in primary and secondary outcome data collection in trials

BACKGROUND: Data collection is a substantial part of trial workload for participants and staff alike. How these hours of work are spent is important because stakeholders are more interested in some outcomes than others. The ORINOCO study compared the time spent collecting primary outcome data to the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Gardner, Heidi, Elfeky, Adel, Pickles, David, Dawson, Annabel, Gillies, Katie, Warwick, Violet, Treweek, Shaun
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2022
Materias:	Methodology
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793601/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36575542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06973-8

Ejemplares similares

Exploring the perspectives of selectors and collecters of trial outcome data: an international qualitative study
por: Green, Heidi R., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
por: Elfeky, Adel, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Using qualitative methods in pilot and feasibility trials to inform recruitment and retention processes in full-scale randomised trials: a qualitative evidence synthesis
por: Elfeky, Adel, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Using systematic data categorisation to quantify the types of data collected in clinical trials: the DataCat project
por: Crowley, Evelyn, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A protocol for a systematic review of non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention to randomised controlled trials
por: El Feky, Adel, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Using evidence when planning for trial recruitment: An international perspective from time-poor trialists
por: Gardner, Heidi R., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Trial Forge Guidance 3: randomised trials and how to recruit and retain individuals from ethnic minority groups—practical guidance to support better practice
por: Dawson, Shoba, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A systematic review of non-randomised evaluations of strategies to improve participant recruitment to randomised controlled trials
por: Gardner, Heidi R, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Developing the INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework—a tool to help trialists design trials that better reflect the communities they serve
por: Treweek, Shaun, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Trial Forge Guidance 2: how to decide if a further Study Within A Trial (SWAT) is needed
por: Treweek, Shaun, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

How much is the lack of retention evidence costing trial teams in Ireland and the UK?
por: Murphy, Ellen, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

What are the most important unanswered research questions in trial retention? A James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership: the PRioRiTy II (Prioritising Retention in Randomised Trials) study
por: Brunsdon, Dan, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Getting it wrong most of the time? Comparing trialists’ choice of primary outcome with what patients and health professionals want
por: Treweek, Shaun, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

An international core outcome set for evaluating interventions to improve informed consent to clinical trials: The ELICIT Study
por: Gillies, Katie, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Process evaluations for cluster-randomised trials of complex interventions: a proposed framework for design and reporting
por: Grant, Aileen, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Evaluating a tool to improve engagement and recruitment of under-served groups in trials
por: Morris, Lydia, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

‘It's trying to manage the work’: a qualitative evaluation of recruitment processes within a UK multicentre trial
por: Skea, Zoë Christina, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Development and evaluation of decision aids for people considering taking part in a clinical trial: a conceptual framework
por: Gillies, Katie, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Making a decision about trial participation: the feasibility of measuring deliberation during the informed consent process for clinical trials
por: Gillies, Katie, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Investment in online self-evaluation tests: A theoretical approach
por: de Gara, Francesco, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Meeting the challenges of recruitment to multicentre, community-based, lifestyle-change trials: a case study of the BeWEL trial
por: Treweek, Shaun, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Estimating Site Performance (ESP): can trial managers predict recruitment success at trial sites? An exploratory study
por: Bruhn, Hanne, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A Good Investment of Money
Publicado: (1889)

Development of a co-designed behaviour change intervention aimed at healthcare professionals recruiting to clinical trials in maternity care
por: Hanrahan, Vivienne, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Effects of georeferencing effort on mapping monkeypox case distributions and transmission risk
por: Lash, R Ryan, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Identifying trial recruitment uncertainties using a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership – the PRioRiTy (Prioritising Recruitment in Randomised Trials) study
por: Healy, Patricia, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Making randomised trials more efficient: report of the first meeting to discuss the Trial Forge platform
por: Treweek, Shaun, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Cognitive effort investment: Does disposition become action?
por: Kührt, Corinna, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

A theory-informed approach to developing visually mediated interventions to change behaviour using an asthma and physical activity intervention exemplar
por: Murray, Jennifer, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

EvaLuation of Interventions for informed Consent for randomIsed controlled Trials (ELICIT): developing a core outcome set
por: Gillies, Katie, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Evaluation of interventions for informed consent for randomised controlled trials (ELICIT): developing a core outcome set
por: Gillies, Katie, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Reducing research waste by promoting informed responses to invitations to participate in clinical trials
por: Gillies, Katie, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Set up and assessment of progression criteria for internal pilots: the Brushing RemInder 4 Good oral HealTh (BRIGHT) trial example
por: Ainsworth, Hannah, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cooperative investment in public goods is kin directed in communal nests of social birds
por: van Dijk, René E, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Routinely collected data for randomized trials: promises, barriers, and implications
por: Mc Cord, Kimberly A., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A novel approach to estimate the impact of health workforce investments on health outcomes through increased coverage of HIV, TB and malaria services
por: Bruckner, Tim A., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Validation of analytical methods in compliance with good manufacturing practice: a practical approach
por: Rustichelli, Deborah, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Public involvement in health research: what does ‘good’ look like in practice?
por: Liabo, Kristin, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Voluntary modulation of mental effort investment: an fMRI study
por: Khachouf, Omar T., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Dispositional cognitive effort investment and behavioral demand avoidance: Are they related?
por: Strobel, Alexander, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_6as2emha6kqi44rvui8e1uqs04