Cargando…

Does particle radiation have superior radiobiological advantages for prostate cancer cells? A systematic review of in vitro studies

BACKGROUND: Charged particle beams from protons to carbon ions provide many significant physical benefits in radiation therapy. However, preclinical studies of charged particle therapy for prostate cancer are extremely limited. The aim of this study was to comprehensively investigate the biological...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Du, Tian-Qi, Liu, Ruifeng, Zhang, Qiuning, Luo, Hongtao, Chen, Yanliang, Tan, Mingyu, Wang, Qian, Wu, Xun, Liu, Zhiqiang, Sun, Shilong, Yang, Kehu, Tian, Jinhui, Wang, Xiaohu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36572945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00942-2
_version_ 1784859879571193856
author Du, Tian-Qi
Liu, Ruifeng
Zhang, Qiuning
Luo, Hongtao
Chen, Yanliang
Tan, Mingyu
Wang, Qian
Wu, Xun
Liu, Zhiqiang
Sun, Shilong
Yang, Kehu
Tian, Jinhui
Wang, Xiaohu
author_facet Du, Tian-Qi
Liu, Ruifeng
Zhang, Qiuning
Luo, Hongtao
Chen, Yanliang
Tan, Mingyu
Wang, Qian
Wu, Xun
Liu, Zhiqiang
Sun, Shilong
Yang, Kehu
Tian, Jinhui
Wang, Xiaohu
author_sort Du, Tian-Qi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Charged particle beams from protons to carbon ions provide many significant physical benefits in radiation therapy. However, preclinical studies of charged particle therapy for prostate cancer are extremely limited. The aim of this study was to comprehensively investigate the biological effects of charged particles on prostate cancer from the perspective of in vitro studies. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review by searching EMBASE (OVID), Medline (OVID), and Web of Science databases to identify the publications assessing the radiobiological effects of charged particle irradiation on prostate cancer cells. The data of relative biological effectiveness (RBE), surviving fraction (SF), standard enhancement ratio (SER) and oxygen enhancement ratio (OER) were extracted. RESULTS: We found 12 studies met the eligible criteria. The relative biological effectiveness values of proton and carbon ion irradiation ranged from 0.94 to 1.52, and 1.67 to 3.7, respectively. Surviving fraction of 2 Gy were 0.17 ± 0.12, 0.55 ± 0.20 and 0.53 ± 0.16 in carbon ion, proton, and photon irradiation, respectively. PNKP inhibitor and gold nanoparticles were favorable sensitizing agents, while it was presented poorer performance in GANT61. The oxygen enhancement ratio values of photon and carbon ion irradiation were 2.32 ± 0.04, and 1.77 ± 0.13, respectively. Charged particle irradiation induced more G0-/G1- or G2-/M-phase arrest, more expression of γ-H2AX, more apoptosis, and lower motility and/or migration ability than photon irradiation. CONCLUSIONS: Both carbon ion and proton irradiation have advantages over photon irradiation in radiobiological effects on prostate cancer cell lines. Carbon ion irradiation seems to have further advantages over proton irradiation. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40001-022-00942-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9793637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97936372022-12-28 Does particle radiation have superior radiobiological advantages for prostate cancer cells? A systematic review of in vitro studies Du, Tian-Qi Liu, Ruifeng Zhang, Qiuning Luo, Hongtao Chen, Yanliang Tan, Mingyu Wang, Qian Wu, Xun Liu, Zhiqiang Sun, Shilong Yang, Kehu Tian, Jinhui Wang, Xiaohu Eur J Med Res Review BACKGROUND: Charged particle beams from protons to carbon ions provide many significant physical benefits in radiation therapy. However, preclinical studies of charged particle therapy for prostate cancer are extremely limited. The aim of this study was to comprehensively investigate the biological effects of charged particles on prostate cancer from the perspective of in vitro studies. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review by searching EMBASE (OVID), Medline (OVID), and Web of Science databases to identify the publications assessing the radiobiological effects of charged particle irradiation on prostate cancer cells. The data of relative biological effectiveness (RBE), surviving fraction (SF), standard enhancement ratio (SER) and oxygen enhancement ratio (OER) were extracted. RESULTS: We found 12 studies met the eligible criteria. The relative biological effectiveness values of proton and carbon ion irradiation ranged from 0.94 to 1.52, and 1.67 to 3.7, respectively. Surviving fraction of 2 Gy were 0.17 ± 0.12, 0.55 ± 0.20 and 0.53 ± 0.16 in carbon ion, proton, and photon irradiation, respectively. PNKP inhibitor and gold nanoparticles were favorable sensitizing agents, while it was presented poorer performance in GANT61. The oxygen enhancement ratio values of photon and carbon ion irradiation were 2.32 ± 0.04, and 1.77 ± 0.13, respectively. Charged particle irradiation induced more G0-/G1- or G2-/M-phase arrest, more expression of γ-H2AX, more apoptosis, and lower motility and/or migration ability than photon irradiation. CONCLUSIONS: Both carbon ion and proton irradiation have advantages over photon irradiation in radiobiological effects on prostate cancer cell lines. Carbon ion irradiation seems to have further advantages over proton irradiation. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40001-022-00942-2. BioMed Central 2022-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9793637/ /pubmed/36572945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00942-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Du, Tian-Qi
Liu, Ruifeng
Zhang, Qiuning
Luo, Hongtao
Chen, Yanliang
Tan, Mingyu
Wang, Qian
Wu, Xun
Liu, Zhiqiang
Sun, Shilong
Yang, Kehu
Tian, Jinhui
Wang, Xiaohu
Does particle radiation have superior radiobiological advantages for prostate cancer cells? A systematic review of in vitro studies
title Does particle radiation have superior radiobiological advantages for prostate cancer cells? A systematic review of in vitro studies
title_full Does particle radiation have superior radiobiological advantages for prostate cancer cells? A systematic review of in vitro studies
title_fullStr Does particle radiation have superior radiobiological advantages for prostate cancer cells? A systematic review of in vitro studies
title_full_unstemmed Does particle radiation have superior radiobiological advantages for prostate cancer cells? A systematic review of in vitro studies
title_short Does particle radiation have superior radiobiological advantages for prostate cancer cells? A systematic review of in vitro studies
title_sort does particle radiation have superior radiobiological advantages for prostate cancer cells? a systematic review of in vitro studies
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36572945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00942-2
work_keys_str_mv AT dutianqi doesparticleradiationhavesuperiorradiobiologicaladvantagesforprostatecancercellsasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies
AT liuruifeng doesparticleradiationhavesuperiorradiobiologicaladvantagesforprostatecancercellsasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies
AT zhangqiuning doesparticleradiationhavesuperiorradiobiologicaladvantagesforprostatecancercellsasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies
AT luohongtao doesparticleradiationhavesuperiorradiobiologicaladvantagesforprostatecancercellsasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies
AT chenyanliang doesparticleradiationhavesuperiorradiobiologicaladvantagesforprostatecancercellsasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies
AT tanmingyu doesparticleradiationhavesuperiorradiobiologicaladvantagesforprostatecancercellsasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies
AT wangqian doesparticleradiationhavesuperiorradiobiologicaladvantagesforprostatecancercellsasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies
AT wuxun doesparticleradiationhavesuperiorradiobiologicaladvantagesforprostatecancercellsasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies
AT liuzhiqiang doesparticleradiationhavesuperiorradiobiologicaladvantagesforprostatecancercellsasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies
AT sunshilong doesparticleradiationhavesuperiorradiobiologicaladvantagesforprostatecancercellsasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies
AT yangkehu doesparticleradiationhavesuperiorradiobiologicaladvantagesforprostatecancercellsasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies
AT tianjinhui doesparticleradiationhavesuperiorradiobiologicaladvantagesforprostatecancercellsasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies
AT wangxiaohu doesparticleradiationhavesuperiorradiobiologicaladvantagesforprostatecancercellsasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies