Cargando…
Does particle radiation have superior radiobiological advantages for prostate cancer cells? A systematic review of in vitro studies
BACKGROUND: Charged particle beams from protons to carbon ions provide many significant physical benefits in radiation therapy. However, preclinical studies of charged particle therapy for prostate cancer are extremely limited. The aim of this study was to comprehensively investigate the biological...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36572945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00942-2 |
_version_ | 1784859879571193856 |
---|---|
author | Du, Tian-Qi Liu, Ruifeng Zhang, Qiuning Luo, Hongtao Chen, Yanliang Tan, Mingyu Wang, Qian Wu, Xun Liu, Zhiqiang Sun, Shilong Yang, Kehu Tian, Jinhui Wang, Xiaohu |
author_facet | Du, Tian-Qi Liu, Ruifeng Zhang, Qiuning Luo, Hongtao Chen, Yanliang Tan, Mingyu Wang, Qian Wu, Xun Liu, Zhiqiang Sun, Shilong Yang, Kehu Tian, Jinhui Wang, Xiaohu |
author_sort | Du, Tian-Qi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Charged particle beams from protons to carbon ions provide many significant physical benefits in radiation therapy. However, preclinical studies of charged particle therapy for prostate cancer are extremely limited. The aim of this study was to comprehensively investigate the biological effects of charged particles on prostate cancer from the perspective of in vitro studies. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review by searching EMBASE (OVID), Medline (OVID), and Web of Science databases to identify the publications assessing the radiobiological effects of charged particle irradiation on prostate cancer cells. The data of relative biological effectiveness (RBE), surviving fraction (SF), standard enhancement ratio (SER) and oxygen enhancement ratio (OER) were extracted. RESULTS: We found 12 studies met the eligible criteria. The relative biological effectiveness values of proton and carbon ion irradiation ranged from 0.94 to 1.52, and 1.67 to 3.7, respectively. Surviving fraction of 2 Gy were 0.17 ± 0.12, 0.55 ± 0.20 and 0.53 ± 0.16 in carbon ion, proton, and photon irradiation, respectively. PNKP inhibitor and gold nanoparticles were favorable sensitizing agents, while it was presented poorer performance in GANT61. The oxygen enhancement ratio values of photon and carbon ion irradiation were 2.32 ± 0.04, and 1.77 ± 0.13, respectively. Charged particle irradiation induced more G0-/G1- or G2-/M-phase arrest, more expression of γ-H2AX, more apoptosis, and lower motility and/or migration ability than photon irradiation. CONCLUSIONS: Both carbon ion and proton irradiation have advantages over photon irradiation in radiobiological effects on prostate cancer cell lines. Carbon ion irradiation seems to have further advantages over proton irradiation. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40001-022-00942-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9793637 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97936372022-12-28 Does particle radiation have superior radiobiological advantages for prostate cancer cells? A systematic review of in vitro studies Du, Tian-Qi Liu, Ruifeng Zhang, Qiuning Luo, Hongtao Chen, Yanliang Tan, Mingyu Wang, Qian Wu, Xun Liu, Zhiqiang Sun, Shilong Yang, Kehu Tian, Jinhui Wang, Xiaohu Eur J Med Res Review BACKGROUND: Charged particle beams from protons to carbon ions provide many significant physical benefits in radiation therapy. However, preclinical studies of charged particle therapy for prostate cancer are extremely limited. The aim of this study was to comprehensively investigate the biological effects of charged particles on prostate cancer from the perspective of in vitro studies. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review by searching EMBASE (OVID), Medline (OVID), and Web of Science databases to identify the publications assessing the radiobiological effects of charged particle irradiation on prostate cancer cells. The data of relative biological effectiveness (RBE), surviving fraction (SF), standard enhancement ratio (SER) and oxygen enhancement ratio (OER) were extracted. RESULTS: We found 12 studies met the eligible criteria. The relative biological effectiveness values of proton and carbon ion irradiation ranged from 0.94 to 1.52, and 1.67 to 3.7, respectively. Surviving fraction of 2 Gy were 0.17 ± 0.12, 0.55 ± 0.20 and 0.53 ± 0.16 in carbon ion, proton, and photon irradiation, respectively. PNKP inhibitor and gold nanoparticles were favorable sensitizing agents, while it was presented poorer performance in GANT61. The oxygen enhancement ratio values of photon and carbon ion irradiation were 2.32 ± 0.04, and 1.77 ± 0.13, respectively. Charged particle irradiation induced more G0-/G1- or G2-/M-phase arrest, more expression of γ-H2AX, more apoptosis, and lower motility and/or migration ability than photon irradiation. CONCLUSIONS: Both carbon ion and proton irradiation have advantages over photon irradiation in radiobiological effects on prostate cancer cell lines. Carbon ion irradiation seems to have further advantages over proton irradiation. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40001-022-00942-2. BioMed Central 2022-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9793637/ /pubmed/36572945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00942-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Du, Tian-Qi Liu, Ruifeng Zhang, Qiuning Luo, Hongtao Chen, Yanliang Tan, Mingyu Wang, Qian Wu, Xun Liu, Zhiqiang Sun, Shilong Yang, Kehu Tian, Jinhui Wang, Xiaohu Does particle radiation have superior radiobiological advantages for prostate cancer cells? A systematic review of in vitro studies |
title | Does particle radiation have superior radiobiological advantages for prostate cancer cells? A systematic review of in vitro studies |
title_full | Does particle radiation have superior radiobiological advantages for prostate cancer cells? A systematic review of in vitro studies |
title_fullStr | Does particle radiation have superior radiobiological advantages for prostate cancer cells? A systematic review of in vitro studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Does particle radiation have superior radiobiological advantages for prostate cancer cells? A systematic review of in vitro studies |
title_short | Does particle radiation have superior radiobiological advantages for prostate cancer cells? A systematic review of in vitro studies |
title_sort | does particle radiation have superior radiobiological advantages for prostate cancer cells? a systematic review of in vitro studies |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36572945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00942-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dutianqi doesparticleradiationhavesuperiorradiobiologicaladvantagesforprostatecancercellsasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies AT liuruifeng doesparticleradiationhavesuperiorradiobiologicaladvantagesforprostatecancercellsasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies AT zhangqiuning doesparticleradiationhavesuperiorradiobiologicaladvantagesforprostatecancercellsasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies AT luohongtao doesparticleradiationhavesuperiorradiobiologicaladvantagesforprostatecancercellsasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies AT chenyanliang doesparticleradiationhavesuperiorradiobiologicaladvantagesforprostatecancercellsasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies AT tanmingyu doesparticleradiationhavesuperiorradiobiologicaladvantagesforprostatecancercellsasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies AT wangqian doesparticleradiationhavesuperiorradiobiologicaladvantagesforprostatecancercellsasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies AT wuxun doesparticleradiationhavesuperiorradiobiologicaladvantagesforprostatecancercellsasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies AT liuzhiqiang doesparticleradiationhavesuperiorradiobiologicaladvantagesforprostatecancercellsasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies AT sunshilong doesparticleradiationhavesuperiorradiobiologicaladvantagesforprostatecancercellsasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies AT yangkehu doesparticleradiationhavesuperiorradiobiologicaladvantagesforprostatecancercellsasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies AT tianjinhui doesparticleradiationhavesuperiorradiobiologicaladvantagesforprostatecancercellsasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies AT wangxiaohu doesparticleradiationhavesuperiorradiobiologicaladvantagesforprostatecancercellsasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies |