Cargando…

Framing the mobility transition: public communication of industry, science, media, and politics in Germany

BACKGROUND: Applying the Multi-Level Perspective (MLP) on socio-technical transitions, paired with the interdisciplinary framing approach, this paper investigates how incumbent actors of automobility in Germany framed the issue of a "transition of mobility and transport" ("Verkehrs/Mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drexler, C. E., Verse, B., Hauslbauer, A., Lopez, J., Haider, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36589223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13705-022-00374-0
_version_ 1784859916096241664
author Drexler, C. E.
Verse, B.
Hauslbauer, A.
Lopez, J.
Haider, S.
author_facet Drexler, C. E.
Verse, B.
Hauslbauer, A.
Lopez, J.
Haider, S.
author_sort Drexler, C. E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Applying the Multi-Level Perspective (MLP) on socio-technical transitions, paired with the interdisciplinary framing approach, this paper investigates how incumbent actors of automobility in Germany framed the issue of a "transition of mobility and transport" ("Verkehrs/Mobilitätswende") in their public communication in 2020. We first identified representatives of industry, science, policy, and media, since the Verkehrs/Mobilitätswende and its implementation measures are contested among these actors. Employing qualitative content analysis, we then screened 325 public documents according to the elements of the framing approach problem definition, causal interpretation, moral evaluation, and treatment recommendation. RESULTS: Findings show that most of the actors frame a transformation of transport and mobility as a necessity. Their arguments encompass environmental and climate-related issues as well as infrastructural problems for bikes and public transport caused by the hegemony of automobility. The actors propose a variety of solutions, primarily focusing on technical innovations for cars or on the expansion of different infrastructures to achieve a modal shift towards sustainable mobility. CONCLUSION: This paper demonstrates that there is no common understanding of the problems and solutions to foster a mobility transition, as the diversity of problems and solutions proposed within the frame elements is high and complicates the prevailing implementation gap of the mobility transition. Therefore, MLP should be conceptually and methodologically bridged with the interdisciplinary framing approach, particularly with regard to the transition of mobility and transport.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9793817
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97938172022-12-27 Framing the mobility transition: public communication of industry, science, media, and politics in Germany Drexler, C. E. Verse, B. Hauslbauer, A. Lopez, J. Haider, S. Energy Sustain Soc Original Article BACKGROUND: Applying the Multi-Level Perspective (MLP) on socio-technical transitions, paired with the interdisciplinary framing approach, this paper investigates how incumbent actors of automobility in Germany framed the issue of a "transition of mobility and transport" ("Verkehrs/Mobilitätswende") in their public communication in 2020. We first identified representatives of industry, science, policy, and media, since the Verkehrs/Mobilitätswende and its implementation measures are contested among these actors. Employing qualitative content analysis, we then screened 325 public documents according to the elements of the framing approach problem definition, causal interpretation, moral evaluation, and treatment recommendation. RESULTS: Findings show that most of the actors frame a transformation of transport and mobility as a necessity. Their arguments encompass environmental and climate-related issues as well as infrastructural problems for bikes and public transport caused by the hegemony of automobility. The actors propose a variety of solutions, primarily focusing on technical innovations for cars or on the expansion of different infrastructures to achieve a modal shift towards sustainable mobility. CONCLUSION: This paper demonstrates that there is no common understanding of the problems and solutions to foster a mobility transition, as the diversity of problems and solutions proposed within the frame elements is high and complicates the prevailing implementation gap of the mobility transition. Therefore, MLP should be conceptually and methodologically bridged with the interdisciplinary framing approach, particularly with regard to the transition of mobility and transport. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-12-27 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9793817/ /pubmed/36589223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13705-022-00374-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Original Article
Drexler, C. E.
Verse, B.
Hauslbauer, A.
Lopez, J.
Haider, S.
Framing the mobility transition: public communication of industry, science, media, and politics in Germany
title Framing the mobility transition: public communication of industry, science, media, and politics in Germany
title_full Framing the mobility transition: public communication of industry, science, media, and politics in Germany
title_fullStr Framing the mobility transition: public communication of industry, science, media, and politics in Germany
title_full_unstemmed Framing the mobility transition: public communication of industry, science, media, and politics in Germany
title_short Framing the mobility transition: public communication of industry, science, media, and politics in Germany
title_sort framing the mobility transition: public communication of industry, science, media, and politics in germany
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36589223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13705-022-00374-0
work_keys_str_mv AT drexlerce framingthemobilitytransitionpubliccommunicationofindustrysciencemediaandpoliticsingermany
AT verseb framingthemobilitytransitionpubliccommunicationofindustrysciencemediaandpoliticsingermany
AT hauslbauera framingthemobilitytransitionpubliccommunicationofindustrysciencemediaandpoliticsingermany
AT lopezj framingthemobilitytransitionpubliccommunicationofindustrysciencemediaandpoliticsingermany
AT haiders framingthemobilitytransitionpubliccommunicationofindustrysciencemediaandpoliticsingermany