Cargando…

Pulsatile energy consumption as a surrogate marker for vascular afterload improves with time post transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis

The effect of arterial stiffening on elevated pulsatile left ventricular afterload patients with aortic stenosis (AS) is pronounced beyond systemic hypertension. Circulatory afterload pulsatile efficiency (CAPE) is a marker of vascular function, defined as the ratio of steady state energy consumptio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Ning, Adji, Audrey I., Hungerford, Sara L., Namasivayam, Mayooran J., Hayward, Christopher S., Jabbour, Andrew, Muller, David W. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Nature Singapore 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36575229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41440-022-01127-4
_version_ 1784859916330074112
author Song, Ning
Adji, Audrey I.
Hungerford, Sara L.
Namasivayam, Mayooran J.
Hayward, Christopher S.
Jabbour, Andrew
Muller, David W. M.
author_facet Song, Ning
Adji, Audrey I.
Hungerford, Sara L.
Namasivayam, Mayooran J.
Hayward, Christopher S.
Jabbour, Andrew
Muller, David W. M.
author_sort Song, Ning
collection PubMed
description The effect of arterial stiffening on elevated pulsatile left ventricular afterload patients with aortic stenosis (AS) is pronounced beyond systemic hypertension. Circulatory afterload pulsatile efficiency (CAPE) is a marker of vascular function, defined as the ratio of steady state energy consumption (SEC) to maintain systemic circulation and pulsatile energy consumption (PEC). Twenty patients aged 80 ± 7 years were assessed at baseline and a median of 60 days post transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), with pulsatile vascular load calculated using simultaneous radial applanation tonometry derived aortic pressure and cardiac magnetic resonance phase-contrast imaging derived ascending aortic flow. Eight out of 20 patients had a reduction in PEC post TAVR, and the reduction of PEC correlated strongly with the number of days post TAVR (R = 0.62, P < 0.01). Patients assessed within the 100 days of TAVR had a rise in their PEC when compared to baseline (0.19 ± 0.09 vs 0.14 ± 0.08 W, P = 0.04). Baseline PEC correlated moderately with baseline SEC (R = 0.49, P = 0.03), and a high baseline PEC was predictive of post TAVR PEC reduction (R = 0.54, P =0.01). Overall, no significant differences were found between baseline and post TAVR for systolic aortic pressure (131 ± 20 vs 131 ± 20 mmHg), systemic vascular resistance (1894 ± 493 vs 2015 ± 519 dynes.s/cm(5)), aortic valve ejection time (337 ± 22 vs 324 ± 34 ms) or aortic characteristic impedance (120 ± 48 vs 107 ± 41 dynes.s/cm(5)). Improved flow profiles after TAVR likely unmask the true vascular properties by altering ventriculo-valvulo-arterial coupling, leading to downstream vascular remodelling secondary to flow conditioning, and results in eventual improvement of pulsatile afterload as reflected by our proposed index of CAPE. [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9793818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Nature Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97938182022-12-27 Pulsatile energy consumption as a surrogate marker for vascular afterload improves with time post transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis Song, Ning Adji, Audrey I. Hungerford, Sara L. Namasivayam, Mayooran J. Hayward, Christopher S. Jabbour, Andrew Muller, David W. M. Hypertens Res Article The effect of arterial stiffening on elevated pulsatile left ventricular afterload patients with aortic stenosis (AS) is pronounced beyond systemic hypertension. Circulatory afterload pulsatile efficiency (CAPE) is a marker of vascular function, defined as the ratio of steady state energy consumption (SEC) to maintain systemic circulation and pulsatile energy consumption (PEC). Twenty patients aged 80 ± 7 years were assessed at baseline and a median of 60 days post transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), with pulsatile vascular load calculated using simultaneous radial applanation tonometry derived aortic pressure and cardiac magnetic resonance phase-contrast imaging derived ascending aortic flow. Eight out of 20 patients had a reduction in PEC post TAVR, and the reduction of PEC correlated strongly with the number of days post TAVR (R = 0.62, P < 0.01). Patients assessed within the 100 days of TAVR had a rise in their PEC when compared to baseline (0.19 ± 0.09 vs 0.14 ± 0.08 W, P = 0.04). Baseline PEC correlated moderately with baseline SEC (R = 0.49, P = 0.03), and a high baseline PEC was predictive of post TAVR PEC reduction (R = 0.54, P =0.01). Overall, no significant differences were found between baseline and post TAVR for systolic aortic pressure (131 ± 20 vs 131 ± 20 mmHg), systemic vascular resistance (1894 ± 493 vs 2015 ± 519 dynes.s/cm(5)), aortic valve ejection time (337 ± 22 vs 324 ± 34 ms) or aortic characteristic impedance (120 ± 48 vs 107 ± 41 dynes.s/cm(5)). Improved flow profiles after TAVR likely unmask the true vascular properties by altering ventriculo-valvulo-arterial coupling, leading to downstream vascular remodelling secondary to flow conditioning, and results in eventual improvement of pulsatile afterload as reflected by our proposed index of CAPE. [Image: see text] Springer Nature Singapore 2022-12-27 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9793818/ /pubmed/36575229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41440-022-01127-4 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japanese Society of Hypertension 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Song, Ning
Adji, Audrey I.
Hungerford, Sara L.
Namasivayam, Mayooran J.
Hayward, Christopher S.
Jabbour, Andrew
Muller, David W. M.
Pulsatile energy consumption as a surrogate marker for vascular afterload improves with time post transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis
title Pulsatile energy consumption as a surrogate marker for vascular afterload improves with time post transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis
title_full Pulsatile energy consumption as a surrogate marker for vascular afterload improves with time post transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis
title_fullStr Pulsatile energy consumption as a surrogate marker for vascular afterload improves with time post transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis
title_full_unstemmed Pulsatile energy consumption as a surrogate marker for vascular afterload improves with time post transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis
title_short Pulsatile energy consumption as a surrogate marker for vascular afterload improves with time post transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis
title_sort pulsatile energy consumption as a surrogate marker for vascular afterload improves with time post transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36575229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41440-022-01127-4
work_keys_str_mv AT songning pulsatileenergyconsumptionasasurrogatemarkerforvascularafterloadimproveswithtimeposttranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosis
AT adjiaudreyi pulsatileenergyconsumptionasasurrogatemarkerforvascularafterloadimproveswithtimeposttranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosis
AT hungerfordsaral pulsatileenergyconsumptionasasurrogatemarkerforvascularafterloadimproveswithtimeposttranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosis
AT namasivayammayooranj pulsatileenergyconsumptionasasurrogatemarkerforvascularafterloadimproveswithtimeposttranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosis
AT haywardchristophers pulsatileenergyconsumptionasasurrogatemarkerforvascularafterloadimproveswithtimeposttranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosis
AT jabbourandrew pulsatileenergyconsumptionasasurrogatemarkerforvascularafterloadimproveswithtimeposttranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosis
AT mullerdavidwm pulsatileenergyconsumptionasasurrogatemarkerforvascularafterloadimproveswithtimeposttranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinpatientswithaorticstenosis