Cargando…

Reoperation of epicanthal reconstruction using a modified reverse skin-redraping method

With the increasing adoption of medial epicanthoplasty or reconstruction procedures, the number of patients undergoing reoperations is also increasing. However, the surgical techniques useful for reoperations and the potential difficulties during reoperations have not been adequately elucidated. We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chung, Yoon Jae, Park, Bo Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9794256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36595854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032425
_version_ 1784859997470982144
author Chung, Yoon Jae
Park, Bo Young
author_facet Chung, Yoon Jae
Park, Bo Young
author_sort Chung, Yoon Jae
collection PubMed
description With the increasing adoption of medial epicanthoplasty or reconstruction procedures, the number of patients undergoing reoperations is also increasing. However, the surgical techniques useful for reoperations and the potential difficulties during reoperations have not been adequately elucidated. We aimed to describe the use of our modified reverse skin-redraping technique to improve cosmetic outcomes in patients who had previously undergone epicanthal reconstruction. From January 2014 to January 2021, we performed reoperations using our modified reverse skin-redraping technique in patients who had previously undergone epicanthal reconstruction. The main reason for the reoperations was cosmesis. The patients’ ages ranged from 21 to 46 years (average, 28.7 years), and the follow-up periods ranged from 6 to 12 months. A total of 389 patients (311 females and 78 males) underwent reoperations, of which 324 patients (83%) underwent 1 reconstructive surgery and 65 (17%) underwent reconstructive surgeries more than twice after primary epicanthoplasty. The postoperative intercanthal distances could be increased or decreased depending on the preoperative design. After reoperation, 22 patients (5.6%) required additional reoperation. Reoperation of epicanthoplasty is technically challenging. The scarred round shape of the medial epicanthus during the reoperation poses difficulties, and the optimal technique to be used remains unknown. We believe that selection of an individualized restoration method that suits the purpose of surgery is important for patients who require reoperations. In this respect, we suggest that our modified reverse skin-redraping method is a suitable option for improving esthetic outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9794256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97942562022-12-28 Reoperation of epicanthal reconstruction using a modified reverse skin-redraping method Chung, Yoon Jae Park, Bo Young Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 With the increasing adoption of medial epicanthoplasty or reconstruction procedures, the number of patients undergoing reoperations is also increasing. However, the surgical techniques useful for reoperations and the potential difficulties during reoperations have not been adequately elucidated. We aimed to describe the use of our modified reverse skin-redraping technique to improve cosmetic outcomes in patients who had previously undergone epicanthal reconstruction. From January 2014 to January 2021, we performed reoperations using our modified reverse skin-redraping technique in patients who had previously undergone epicanthal reconstruction. The main reason for the reoperations was cosmesis. The patients’ ages ranged from 21 to 46 years (average, 28.7 years), and the follow-up periods ranged from 6 to 12 months. A total of 389 patients (311 females and 78 males) underwent reoperations, of which 324 patients (83%) underwent 1 reconstructive surgery and 65 (17%) underwent reconstructive surgeries more than twice after primary epicanthoplasty. The postoperative intercanthal distances could be increased or decreased depending on the preoperative design. After reoperation, 22 patients (5.6%) required additional reoperation. Reoperation of epicanthoplasty is technically challenging. The scarred round shape of the medial epicanthus during the reoperation poses difficulties, and the optimal technique to be used remains unknown. We believe that selection of an individualized restoration method that suits the purpose of surgery is important for patients who require reoperations. In this respect, we suggest that our modified reverse skin-redraping method is a suitable option for improving esthetic outcomes. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9794256/ /pubmed/36595854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032425 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle 7100
Chung, Yoon Jae
Park, Bo Young
Reoperation of epicanthal reconstruction using a modified reverse skin-redraping method
title Reoperation of epicanthal reconstruction using a modified reverse skin-redraping method
title_full Reoperation of epicanthal reconstruction using a modified reverse skin-redraping method
title_fullStr Reoperation of epicanthal reconstruction using a modified reverse skin-redraping method
title_full_unstemmed Reoperation of epicanthal reconstruction using a modified reverse skin-redraping method
title_short Reoperation of epicanthal reconstruction using a modified reverse skin-redraping method
title_sort reoperation of epicanthal reconstruction using a modified reverse skin-redraping method
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9794256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36595854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032425
work_keys_str_mv AT chungyoonjae reoperationofepicanthalreconstructionusingamodifiedreverseskinredrapingmethod
AT parkboyoung reoperationofepicanthalreconstructionusingamodifiedreverseskinredrapingmethod