Cargando…

Effectiveness of self-management of dry and wet cupping therapy for low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Low back pain (LBP) can significantly affect a person’s quality of life. Cupping has been used to treat LBP. However, various cupping methods are typically included in evaluating the efficacy of cupping therapy. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to evaluate the evidence from the literatur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shen, Wei-Cheng, Jan, Yih-Kuen, Liau, Ben-Yi, Lin, Quanxin, Wang, Song, Tai, Chien-Cheng, Lung, Chi-Wen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9794267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36595746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032325
_version_ 1784860000218251264
author Shen, Wei-Cheng
Jan, Yih-Kuen
Liau, Ben-Yi
Lin, Quanxin
Wang, Song
Tai, Chien-Cheng
Lung, Chi-Wen
author_facet Shen, Wei-Cheng
Jan, Yih-Kuen
Liau, Ben-Yi
Lin, Quanxin
Wang, Song
Tai, Chien-Cheng
Lung, Chi-Wen
author_sort Shen, Wei-Cheng
collection PubMed
description Low back pain (LBP) can significantly affect a person’s quality of life. Cupping has been used to treat LBP. However, various cupping methods are typically included in evaluating the efficacy of cupping therapy. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to evaluate the evidence from the literature regarding the effects of dry and wet cupping therapy on LBP in adults. Dry and wet cupping therapy are analyzed categorically in this study. METHODS: We searched for randomized clinical trials with cupping in LBP published between 2008 and 2022. In dry or wet cupping clinical studies, pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale and present pain intensity, and the quality of life intensity was measured using the Oswestry disability index. RESULTS: The 656 studies were identified, of which 10 studies for 690 patients with LBP were included in the meta-analysis. There was a significant reduction in the pain intensity score with present pain intensity using wet cupping therapy (P < .01). In addition, both cupping therapy groups displayed significant Oswestry disability index score reduction compared to the control group (both P < .01). The patients with LBP have a substantial reduction by using wet cupping but have not shown a considerable decrease by using dry cupping (P = .19). In addition, only wet cupping therapy groups displayed a significantly improved quality of life compared to the control group. The study had a very high heterogeneity (I(2) > 50%). It means there is no standardization in the treatment protocol in randomized clinical trials. In the meta-regression, there was statistically significant evidence that the number of treatment times and intercepts were related (P < .01). CONCLUSION: The present meta-analysis shows that wet cupping therapy effectively reduces the pain intensity of LBP. Furthermore, both dry wet cupping therapy improved patients with LBP quality of life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9794267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97942672022-12-28 Effectiveness of self-management of dry and wet cupping therapy for low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis Shen, Wei-Cheng Jan, Yih-Kuen Liau, Ben-Yi Lin, Quanxin Wang, Song Tai, Chien-Cheng Lung, Chi-Wen Medicine (Baltimore) 6300 Low back pain (LBP) can significantly affect a person’s quality of life. Cupping has been used to treat LBP. However, various cupping methods are typically included in evaluating the efficacy of cupping therapy. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to evaluate the evidence from the literature regarding the effects of dry and wet cupping therapy on LBP in adults. Dry and wet cupping therapy are analyzed categorically in this study. METHODS: We searched for randomized clinical trials with cupping in LBP published between 2008 and 2022. In dry or wet cupping clinical studies, pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale and present pain intensity, and the quality of life intensity was measured using the Oswestry disability index. RESULTS: The 656 studies were identified, of which 10 studies for 690 patients with LBP were included in the meta-analysis. There was a significant reduction in the pain intensity score with present pain intensity using wet cupping therapy (P < .01). In addition, both cupping therapy groups displayed significant Oswestry disability index score reduction compared to the control group (both P < .01). The patients with LBP have a substantial reduction by using wet cupping but have not shown a considerable decrease by using dry cupping (P = .19). In addition, only wet cupping therapy groups displayed a significantly improved quality of life compared to the control group. The study had a very high heterogeneity (I(2) > 50%). It means there is no standardization in the treatment protocol in randomized clinical trials. In the meta-regression, there was statistically significant evidence that the number of treatment times and intercepts were related (P < .01). CONCLUSION: The present meta-analysis shows that wet cupping therapy effectively reduces the pain intensity of LBP. Furthermore, both dry wet cupping therapy improved patients with LBP quality of life. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9794267/ /pubmed/36595746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032325 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle 6300
Shen, Wei-Cheng
Jan, Yih-Kuen
Liau, Ben-Yi
Lin, Quanxin
Wang, Song
Tai, Chien-Cheng
Lung, Chi-Wen
Effectiveness of self-management of dry and wet cupping therapy for low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Effectiveness of self-management of dry and wet cupping therapy for low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Effectiveness of self-management of dry and wet cupping therapy for low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effectiveness of self-management of dry and wet cupping therapy for low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of self-management of dry and wet cupping therapy for low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Effectiveness of self-management of dry and wet cupping therapy for low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effectiveness of self-management of dry and wet cupping therapy for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic 6300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9794267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36595746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032325
work_keys_str_mv AT shenweicheng effectivenessofselfmanagementofdryandwetcuppingtherapyforlowbackpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT janyihkuen effectivenessofselfmanagementofdryandwetcuppingtherapyforlowbackpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liaubenyi effectivenessofselfmanagementofdryandwetcuppingtherapyforlowbackpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT linquanxin effectivenessofselfmanagementofdryandwetcuppingtherapyforlowbackpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangsong effectivenessofselfmanagementofdryandwetcuppingtherapyforlowbackpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT taichiencheng effectivenessofselfmanagementofdryandwetcuppingtherapyforlowbackpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lungchiwen effectivenessofselfmanagementofdryandwetcuppingtherapyforlowbackpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis