Cargando…

Risk for excessive anticoagulation during hemodialysis is associated with type of vascular access and bedside coagulation testing: Results of a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Recommendations and practice patterns for heparin dosing during hemodialysis show substantial heterogeneity and are scantly supported by evidence. This study assessed the variability in unfractionated heparin (UFH) dosing during hemodialysis and its clinical and biological anticoagulator...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Troyer, Marijke, Wissing, Karl Martin, De Clerck, Dieter, Cambier, Marie-Laure, Robberechts, Tom, Tonnelier, Annelies, François, Karlien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9794613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36590973
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1009748
_version_ 1784860077150175232
author De Troyer, Marijke
Wissing, Karl Martin
De Clerck, Dieter
Cambier, Marie-Laure
Robberechts, Tom
Tonnelier, Annelies
François, Karlien
author_facet De Troyer, Marijke
Wissing, Karl Martin
De Clerck, Dieter
Cambier, Marie-Laure
Robberechts, Tom
Tonnelier, Annelies
François, Karlien
author_sort De Troyer, Marijke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recommendations and practice patterns for heparin dosing during hemodialysis show substantial heterogeneity and are scantly supported by evidence. This study assessed the variability in unfractionated heparin (UFH) dosing during hemodialysis and its clinical and biological anticoagulatory effects, and identified explanatory factors of heparin dosing. METHODS: Cross-sectional study assessing UFH dosing, coagulation tests – activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and activated clotting time (ACT) before dialysis start, 1 h after start and at treatment end (4 h) – and measurement of residual blood compartment volume of used dialyzers. RESULTS: 101 patients, 58% male, with a median dialysis vintage of 33 (6–71) months received hemodialysis using a total UFH dose of 9,306 ± 4,079 (range 3,000–23,050) IU/session. Use of a dialysis catheter (n = 56, 55%) was associated with a 1.4 times higher UFH dose (p < 0.001) irrespective of prior access function. aPTT increased significantly more than ACT both 1 h and 4 h after dialysis start, independent of the dialysis access used. 53% of patients with catheter access and ACT ratio < 1.5, 1 h after dialysis start had simultaneous aPTT ratios > 2.5. Similar findings were present at 1 h for patients with AVF/AVG and at dialysis end for catheter use. No clinically significant clotting of the extracorporeal circuit was noted during the studied sessions. Dialyzer’s blood compartment volume was reduced with a median of 9% (6–20%) without significant effect of UFH dose, aPTT or ACT measurements and vascular access type. CONCLUSION: UFH dose adaptations based on ACT measurements frequently result in excessive anticoagulation according to aPTT results. Higher doses of UFH are used in patients with hemodialysis catheters without evidence that this reduces dialyzer clotting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9794613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97946132022-12-29 Risk for excessive anticoagulation during hemodialysis is associated with type of vascular access and bedside coagulation testing: Results of a cross-sectional study De Troyer, Marijke Wissing, Karl Martin De Clerck, Dieter Cambier, Marie-Laure Robberechts, Tom Tonnelier, Annelies François, Karlien Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: Recommendations and practice patterns for heparin dosing during hemodialysis show substantial heterogeneity and are scantly supported by evidence. This study assessed the variability in unfractionated heparin (UFH) dosing during hemodialysis and its clinical and biological anticoagulatory effects, and identified explanatory factors of heparin dosing. METHODS: Cross-sectional study assessing UFH dosing, coagulation tests – activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and activated clotting time (ACT) before dialysis start, 1 h after start and at treatment end (4 h) – and measurement of residual blood compartment volume of used dialyzers. RESULTS: 101 patients, 58% male, with a median dialysis vintage of 33 (6–71) months received hemodialysis using a total UFH dose of 9,306 ± 4,079 (range 3,000–23,050) IU/session. Use of a dialysis catheter (n = 56, 55%) was associated with a 1.4 times higher UFH dose (p < 0.001) irrespective of prior access function. aPTT increased significantly more than ACT both 1 h and 4 h after dialysis start, independent of the dialysis access used. 53% of patients with catheter access and ACT ratio < 1.5, 1 h after dialysis start had simultaneous aPTT ratios > 2.5. Similar findings were present at 1 h for patients with AVF/AVG and at dialysis end for catheter use. No clinically significant clotting of the extracorporeal circuit was noted during the studied sessions. Dialyzer’s blood compartment volume was reduced with a median of 9% (6–20%) without significant effect of UFH dose, aPTT or ACT measurements and vascular access type. CONCLUSION: UFH dose adaptations based on ACT measurements frequently result in excessive anticoagulation according to aPTT results. Higher doses of UFH are used in patients with hemodialysis catheters without evidence that this reduces dialyzer clotting. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9794613/ /pubmed/36590973 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1009748 Text en Copyright © 2022 De Troyer, Wissing, De Clerck, Cambier, Robberechts, Tonnelier and François. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
De Troyer, Marijke
Wissing, Karl Martin
De Clerck, Dieter
Cambier, Marie-Laure
Robberechts, Tom
Tonnelier, Annelies
François, Karlien
Risk for excessive anticoagulation during hemodialysis is associated with type of vascular access and bedside coagulation testing: Results of a cross-sectional study
title Risk for excessive anticoagulation during hemodialysis is associated with type of vascular access and bedside coagulation testing: Results of a cross-sectional study
title_full Risk for excessive anticoagulation during hemodialysis is associated with type of vascular access and bedside coagulation testing: Results of a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Risk for excessive anticoagulation during hemodialysis is associated with type of vascular access and bedside coagulation testing: Results of a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Risk for excessive anticoagulation during hemodialysis is associated with type of vascular access and bedside coagulation testing: Results of a cross-sectional study
title_short Risk for excessive anticoagulation during hemodialysis is associated with type of vascular access and bedside coagulation testing: Results of a cross-sectional study
title_sort risk for excessive anticoagulation during hemodialysis is associated with type of vascular access and bedside coagulation testing: results of a cross-sectional study
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9794613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36590973
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1009748
work_keys_str_mv AT detroyermarijke riskforexcessiveanticoagulationduringhemodialysisisassociatedwithtypeofvascularaccessandbedsidecoagulationtestingresultsofacrosssectionalstudy
AT wissingkarlmartin riskforexcessiveanticoagulationduringhemodialysisisassociatedwithtypeofvascularaccessandbedsidecoagulationtestingresultsofacrosssectionalstudy
AT declerckdieter riskforexcessiveanticoagulationduringhemodialysisisassociatedwithtypeofvascularaccessandbedsidecoagulationtestingresultsofacrosssectionalstudy
AT cambiermarielaure riskforexcessiveanticoagulationduringhemodialysisisassociatedwithtypeofvascularaccessandbedsidecoagulationtestingresultsofacrosssectionalstudy
AT robberechtstom riskforexcessiveanticoagulationduringhemodialysisisassociatedwithtypeofvascularaccessandbedsidecoagulationtestingresultsofacrosssectionalstudy
AT tonnelierannelies riskforexcessiveanticoagulationduringhemodialysisisassociatedwithtypeofvascularaccessandbedsidecoagulationtestingresultsofacrosssectionalstudy
AT francoiskarlien riskforexcessiveanticoagulationduringhemodialysisisassociatedwithtypeofvascularaccessandbedsidecoagulationtestingresultsofacrosssectionalstudy