Cargando…

Executive function and effortful control—Similar and different evidence from big data analysis

INTRODUCTION: The current study explored commonalities and similarities between executive function (EF) and effortful control (EC). METHODS: The major empirical studies published between 2013 and 2022 in the World of Science (WoS) was collected. The bibliographic information was systematically analy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Chae, Soo Eun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9794866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36591081
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1004403
_version_ 1784860124393766912
author Chae, Soo Eun
author_facet Chae, Soo Eun
author_sort Chae, Soo Eun
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The current study explored commonalities and similarities between executive function (EF) and effortful control (EC). METHODS: The major empirical studies published between 2013 and 2022 in the World of Science (WoS) was collected. The bibliographic information was systematically analyzed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: (1) EC is the efficiency of executive attention that incorporates inhibitory control (IC), attentional control, activation mainly related to temperament. On the other hand, EF is the efficiency of self-directed action that encompasses IC, working memory (WM), and shifting/cognitive flexibility in particular focuses on the cognitive aspect. (2) EF research has overwhelmingly outnumbered EC research (2,000 EF studies vs. 50 EC studies per year). (3) According to a co-word analysis with keyword co-occurrences, the subject of preschool students and individual differences co-occurred in EF studies. (4) EC usually occurs with working memory and early childhood. In the more detailed analysis of the articles, the EF and EC studies used younger subject groups than older subject groups. EC studies were especially likely to use subjects in early childhood. (5) The Delis–Kaplan Tests of Executive Functioning System (D-KEFS) was the most commonly used test for EF. In contrast, the EC used self-report surveys such as the Adolescent Temperament Questionnaire (ATQ). This research illustrates and discusses key findings in the EC and EF data and provides suggestions for future study directions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9794866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97948662022-12-29 Executive function and effortful control—Similar and different evidence from big data analysis Chae, Soo Eun Front Psychol Psychology INTRODUCTION: The current study explored commonalities and similarities between executive function (EF) and effortful control (EC). METHODS: The major empirical studies published between 2013 and 2022 in the World of Science (WoS) was collected. The bibliographic information was systematically analyzed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: (1) EC is the efficiency of executive attention that incorporates inhibitory control (IC), attentional control, activation mainly related to temperament. On the other hand, EF is the efficiency of self-directed action that encompasses IC, working memory (WM), and shifting/cognitive flexibility in particular focuses on the cognitive aspect. (2) EF research has overwhelmingly outnumbered EC research (2,000 EF studies vs. 50 EC studies per year). (3) According to a co-word analysis with keyword co-occurrences, the subject of preschool students and individual differences co-occurred in EF studies. (4) EC usually occurs with working memory and early childhood. In the more detailed analysis of the articles, the EF and EC studies used younger subject groups than older subject groups. EC studies were especially likely to use subjects in early childhood. (5) The Delis–Kaplan Tests of Executive Functioning System (D-KEFS) was the most commonly used test for EF. In contrast, the EC used self-report surveys such as the Adolescent Temperament Questionnaire (ATQ). This research illustrates and discusses key findings in the EC and EF data and provides suggestions for future study directions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9794866/ /pubmed/36591081 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1004403 Text en Copyright © 2022 Chae. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Chae, Soo Eun
Executive function and effortful control—Similar and different evidence from big data analysis
title Executive function and effortful control—Similar and different evidence from big data analysis
title_full Executive function and effortful control—Similar and different evidence from big data analysis
title_fullStr Executive function and effortful control—Similar and different evidence from big data analysis
title_full_unstemmed Executive function and effortful control—Similar and different evidence from big data analysis
title_short Executive function and effortful control—Similar and different evidence from big data analysis
title_sort executive function and effortful control—similar and different evidence from big data analysis
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9794866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36591081
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1004403
work_keys_str_mv AT chaesooeun executivefunctionandeffortfulcontrolsimilaranddifferentevidencefrombigdataanalysis