Cargando…
Executive function and effortful control—Similar and different evidence from big data analysis
INTRODUCTION: The current study explored commonalities and similarities between executive function (EF) and effortful control (EC). METHODS: The major empirical studies published between 2013 and 2022 in the World of Science (WoS) was collected. The bibliographic information was systematically analy...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9794866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36591081 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1004403 |
_version_ | 1784860124393766912 |
---|---|
author | Chae, Soo Eun |
author_facet | Chae, Soo Eun |
author_sort | Chae, Soo Eun |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The current study explored commonalities and similarities between executive function (EF) and effortful control (EC). METHODS: The major empirical studies published between 2013 and 2022 in the World of Science (WoS) was collected. The bibliographic information was systematically analyzed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: (1) EC is the efficiency of executive attention that incorporates inhibitory control (IC), attentional control, activation mainly related to temperament. On the other hand, EF is the efficiency of self-directed action that encompasses IC, working memory (WM), and shifting/cognitive flexibility in particular focuses on the cognitive aspect. (2) EF research has overwhelmingly outnumbered EC research (2,000 EF studies vs. 50 EC studies per year). (3) According to a co-word analysis with keyword co-occurrences, the subject of preschool students and individual differences co-occurred in EF studies. (4) EC usually occurs with working memory and early childhood. In the more detailed analysis of the articles, the EF and EC studies used younger subject groups than older subject groups. EC studies were especially likely to use subjects in early childhood. (5) The Delis–Kaplan Tests of Executive Functioning System (D-KEFS) was the most commonly used test for EF. In contrast, the EC used self-report surveys such as the Adolescent Temperament Questionnaire (ATQ). This research illustrates and discusses key findings in the EC and EF data and provides suggestions for future study directions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9794866 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97948662022-12-29 Executive function and effortful control—Similar and different evidence from big data analysis Chae, Soo Eun Front Psychol Psychology INTRODUCTION: The current study explored commonalities and similarities between executive function (EF) and effortful control (EC). METHODS: The major empirical studies published between 2013 and 2022 in the World of Science (WoS) was collected. The bibliographic information was systematically analyzed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: (1) EC is the efficiency of executive attention that incorporates inhibitory control (IC), attentional control, activation mainly related to temperament. On the other hand, EF is the efficiency of self-directed action that encompasses IC, working memory (WM), and shifting/cognitive flexibility in particular focuses on the cognitive aspect. (2) EF research has overwhelmingly outnumbered EC research (2,000 EF studies vs. 50 EC studies per year). (3) According to a co-word analysis with keyword co-occurrences, the subject of preschool students and individual differences co-occurred in EF studies. (4) EC usually occurs with working memory and early childhood. In the more detailed analysis of the articles, the EF and EC studies used younger subject groups than older subject groups. EC studies were especially likely to use subjects in early childhood. (5) The Delis–Kaplan Tests of Executive Functioning System (D-KEFS) was the most commonly used test for EF. In contrast, the EC used self-report surveys such as the Adolescent Temperament Questionnaire (ATQ). This research illustrates and discusses key findings in the EC and EF data and provides suggestions for future study directions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9794866/ /pubmed/36591081 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1004403 Text en Copyright © 2022 Chae. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Chae, Soo Eun Executive function and effortful control—Similar and different evidence from big data analysis |
title | Executive function and effortful control—Similar and different evidence from big data analysis |
title_full | Executive function and effortful control—Similar and different evidence from big data analysis |
title_fullStr | Executive function and effortful control—Similar and different evidence from big data analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Executive function and effortful control—Similar and different evidence from big data analysis |
title_short | Executive function and effortful control—Similar and different evidence from big data analysis |
title_sort | executive function and effortful control—similar and different evidence from big data analysis |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9794866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36591081 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1004403 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chaesooeun executivefunctionandeffortfulcontrolsimilaranddifferentevidencefrombigdataanalysis |