Cargando…

Community health workers and promotoras’ perspectives of a research best practice course: A focus group study

INTRODUCTION: Community Health Workers and Promotoras (CHW/Ps) are valued for their role in helping to engage community members in research. CHW/Ps have traditionally received variable training in research fundamentals, including importance and promotion of research rigor to establish consistency in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Varma, Deepthi S., Samuels, Elias, Piatt, Gretchen, Watkins, Daphne C., Spiroff, Meghan, Cottler, Linda B., Gaxiola, Sergio Aguilar, Murphy, Susan L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9794952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36590350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.464
_version_ 1784860145408278528
author Varma, Deepthi S.
Samuels, Elias
Piatt, Gretchen
Watkins, Daphne C.
Spiroff, Meghan
Cottler, Linda B.
Gaxiola, Sergio Aguilar
Murphy, Susan L.
author_facet Varma, Deepthi S.
Samuels, Elias
Piatt, Gretchen
Watkins, Daphne C.
Spiroff, Meghan
Cottler, Linda B.
Gaxiola, Sergio Aguilar
Murphy, Susan L.
author_sort Varma, Deepthi S.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Community Health Workers and Promotoras (CHW/Ps) are valued for their role in helping to engage community members in research. CHW/Ps have traditionally received variable training in research fundamentals, including importance and promotion of research rigor to establish consistency in the methods used over time. Research best practices training exists for research professionals, but no standard training is provided as part of the CHW/P job role. To develop this CHW/P research best practices training, our team engaged English- and Spanish-speaking CHW/Ps to watch an early version of an online module and to examine perceptions of the relevance of such a training and optimal delivery methods. METHODS: Six virtual focus group discussions were conducted (three in English and three in Spanish) across different US geographic regions with currently employed CHW/Ps. RESULTS: Forty CHW/Ps participated (95% female, mean age 44 years, 58% identifying as Hispanic/Latino). Four themes emerged: relevance of training, benefits of providing a certificate of completion, flexible training delivery modalities, and peer-led training. DISCUSSION: With participation from representatives of the intended learner group of CHW/Ps, our team found that CHW/Ps valued learning about research best practices. They perceived culturally- and linguistically appropriate health research training to be highly relevant to their role, particularly for communicating key information to community members about their participation in health research. Additionally, participants provided input on effective dissemination of the training including the benefit of having proof of course completion, involvement of peer trainers, and value of providing the option to participate in online training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9794952
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97949522022-12-30 Community health workers and promotoras’ perspectives of a research best practice course: A focus group study Varma, Deepthi S. Samuels, Elias Piatt, Gretchen Watkins, Daphne C. Spiroff, Meghan Cottler, Linda B. Gaxiola, Sergio Aguilar Murphy, Susan L. J Clin Transl Sci Research Article INTRODUCTION: Community Health Workers and Promotoras (CHW/Ps) are valued for their role in helping to engage community members in research. CHW/Ps have traditionally received variable training in research fundamentals, including importance and promotion of research rigor to establish consistency in the methods used over time. Research best practices training exists for research professionals, but no standard training is provided as part of the CHW/P job role. To develop this CHW/P research best practices training, our team engaged English- and Spanish-speaking CHW/Ps to watch an early version of an online module and to examine perceptions of the relevance of such a training and optimal delivery methods. METHODS: Six virtual focus group discussions were conducted (three in English and three in Spanish) across different US geographic regions with currently employed CHW/Ps. RESULTS: Forty CHW/Ps participated (95% female, mean age 44 years, 58% identifying as Hispanic/Latino). Four themes emerged: relevance of training, benefits of providing a certificate of completion, flexible training delivery modalities, and peer-led training. DISCUSSION: With participation from representatives of the intended learner group of CHW/Ps, our team found that CHW/Ps valued learning about research best practices. They perceived culturally- and linguistically appropriate health research training to be highly relevant to their role, particularly for communicating key information to community members about their participation in health research. Additionally, participants provided input on effective dissemination of the training including the benefit of having proof of course completion, involvement of peer trainers, and value of providing the option to participate in online training. Cambridge University Press 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9794952/ /pubmed/36590350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.464 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Varma, Deepthi S.
Samuels, Elias
Piatt, Gretchen
Watkins, Daphne C.
Spiroff, Meghan
Cottler, Linda B.
Gaxiola, Sergio Aguilar
Murphy, Susan L.
Community health workers and promotoras’ perspectives of a research best practice course: A focus group study
title Community health workers and promotoras’ perspectives of a research best practice course: A focus group study
title_full Community health workers and promotoras’ perspectives of a research best practice course: A focus group study
title_fullStr Community health workers and promotoras’ perspectives of a research best practice course: A focus group study
title_full_unstemmed Community health workers and promotoras’ perspectives of a research best practice course: A focus group study
title_short Community health workers and promotoras’ perspectives of a research best practice course: A focus group study
title_sort community health workers and promotoras’ perspectives of a research best practice course: a focus group study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9794952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36590350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.464
work_keys_str_mv AT varmadeepthis communityhealthworkersandpromotorasperspectivesofaresearchbestpracticecourseafocusgroupstudy
AT samuelselias communityhealthworkersandpromotorasperspectivesofaresearchbestpracticecourseafocusgroupstudy
AT piattgretchen communityhealthworkersandpromotorasperspectivesofaresearchbestpracticecourseafocusgroupstudy
AT watkinsdaphnec communityhealthworkersandpromotorasperspectivesofaresearchbestpracticecourseafocusgroupstudy
AT spiroffmeghan communityhealthworkersandpromotorasperspectivesofaresearchbestpracticecourseafocusgroupstudy
AT cottlerlindab communityhealthworkersandpromotorasperspectivesofaresearchbestpracticecourseafocusgroupstudy
AT gaxiolasergioaguilar communityhealthworkersandpromotorasperspectivesofaresearchbestpracticecourseafocusgroupstudy
AT murphysusanl communityhealthworkersandpromotorasperspectivesofaresearchbestpracticecourseafocusgroupstudy