Cargando…
Community health workers and promotoras’ perspectives of a research best practice course: A focus group study
INTRODUCTION: Community Health Workers and Promotoras (CHW/Ps) are valued for their role in helping to engage community members in research. CHW/Ps have traditionally received variable training in research fundamentals, including importance and promotion of research rigor to establish consistency in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9794952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36590350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.464 |
_version_ | 1784860145408278528 |
---|---|
author | Varma, Deepthi S. Samuels, Elias Piatt, Gretchen Watkins, Daphne C. Spiroff, Meghan Cottler, Linda B. Gaxiola, Sergio Aguilar Murphy, Susan L. |
author_facet | Varma, Deepthi S. Samuels, Elias Piatt, Gretchen Watkins, Daphne C. Spiroff, Meghan Cottler, Linda B. Gaxiola, Sergio Aguilar Murphy, Susan L. |
author_sort | Varma, Deepthi S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Community Health Workers and Promotoras (CHW/Ps) are valued for their role in helping to engage community members in research. CHW/Ps have traditionally received variable training in research fundamentals, including importance and promotion of research rigor to establish consistency in the methods used over time. Research best practices training exists for research professionals, but no standard training is provided as part of the CHW/P job role. To develop this CHW/P research best practices training, our team engaged English- and Spanish-speaking CHW/Ps to watch an early version of an online module and to examine perceptions of the relevance of such a training and optimal delivery methods. METHODS: Six virtual focus group discussions were conducted (three in English and three in Spanish) across different US geographic regions with currently employed CHW/Ps. RESULTS: Forty CHW/Ps participated (95% female, mean age 44 years, 58% identifying as Hispanic/Latino). Four themes emerged: relevance of training, benefits of providing a certificate of completion, flexible training delivery modalities, and peer-led training. DISCUSSION: With participation from representatives of the intended learner group of CHW/Ps, our team found that CHW/Ps valued learning about research best practices. They perceived culturally- and linguistically appropriate health research training to be highly relevant to their role, particularly for communicating key information to community members about their participation in health research. Additionally, participants provided input on effective dissemination of the training including the benefit of having proof of course completion, involvement of peer trainers, and value of providing the option to participate in online training. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9794952 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97949522022-12-30 Community health workers and promotoras’ perspectives of a research best practice course: A focus group study Varma, Deepthi S. Samuels, Elias Piatt, Gretchen Watkins, Daphne C. Spiroff, Meghan Cottler, Linda B. Gaxiola, Sergio Aguilar Murphy, Susan L. J Clin Transl Sci Research Article INTRODUCTION: Community Health Workers and Promotoras (CHW/Ps) are valued for their role in helping to engage community members in research. CHW/Ps have traditionally received variable training in research fundamentals, including importance and promotion of research rigor to establish consistency in the methods used over time. Research best practices training exists for research professionals, but no standard training is provided as part of the CHW/P job role. To develop this CHW/P research best practices training, our team engaged English- and Spanish-speaking CHW/Ps to watch an early version of an online module and to examine perceptions of the relevance of such a training and optimal delivery methods. METHODS: Six virtual focus group discussions were conducted (three in English and three in Spanish) across different US geographic regions with currently employed CHW/Ps. RESULTS: Forty CHW/Ps participated (95% female, mean age 44 years, 58% identifying as Hispanic/Latino). Four themes emerged: relevance of training, benefits of providing a certificate of completion, flexible training delivery modalities, and peer-led training. DISCUSSION: With participation from representatives of the intended learner group of CHW/Ps, our team found that CHW/Ps valued learning about research best practices. They perceived culturally- and linguistically appropriate health research training to be highly relevant to their role, particularly for communicating key information to community members about their participation in health research. Additionally, participants provided input on effective dissemination of the training including the benefit of having proof of course completion, involvement of peer trainers, and value of providing the option to participate in online training. Cambridge University Press 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9794952/ /pubmed/36590350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.464 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Varma, Deepthi S. Samuels, Elias Piatt, Gretchen Watkins, Daphne C. Spiroff, Meghan Cottler, Linda B. Gaxiola, Sergio Aguilar Murphy, Susan L. Community health workers and promotoras’ perspectives of a research best practice course: A focus group study |
title | Community health workers and promotoras’ perspectives of a research best practice course: A focus group study |
title_full | Community health workers and promotoras’ perspectives of a research best practice course: A focus group study |
title_fullStr | Community health workers and promotoras’ perspectives of a research best practice course: A focus group study |
title_full_unstemmed | Community health workers and promotoras’ perspectives of a research best practice course: A focus group study |
title_short | Community health workers and promotoras’ perspectives of a research best practice course: A focus group study |
title_sort | community health workers and promotoras’ perspectives of a research best practice course: a focus group study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9794952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36590350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.464 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT varmadeepthis communityhealthworkersandpromotorasperspectivesofaresearchbestpracticecourseafocusgroupstudy AT samuelselias communityhealthworkersandpromotorasperspectivesofaresearchbestpracticecourseafocusgroupstudy AT piattgretchen communityhealthworkersandpromotorasperspectivesofaresearchbestpracticecourseafocusgroupstudy AT watkinsdaphnec communityhealthworkersandpromotorasperspectivesofaresearchbestpracticecourseafocusgroupstudy AT spiroffmeghan communityhealthworkersandpromotorasperspectivesofaresearchbestpracticecourseafocusgroupstudy AT cottlerlindab communityhealthworkersandpromotorasperspectivesofaresearchbestpracticecourseafocusgroupstudy AT gaxiolasergioaguilar communityhealthworkersandpromotorasperspectivesofaresearchbestpracticecourseafocusgroupstudy AT murphysusanl communityhealthworkersandpromotorasperspectivesofaresearchbestpracticecourseafocusgroupstudy |