Cargando…

Stemming the tide of distrust: A mixed-methods study of vaccine hesitancy

Public distrust in the US pandemic response has significantly hindered its effectiveness. In this community-based participatory research mixed-methods study, based on two datasets, we examined how distrust in COVID-19 vaccines relates to institutional distrust. We found that the Johnson & Johnso...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Plunk, Andrew, Sheehan, Brynn, Orr, Shelly, Gartner, Danielle, Moeller, F. Gerard, Jain, Praduman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9794956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36590354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.492
_version_ 1784860146514526208
author Plunk, Andrew
Sheehan, Brynn
Orr, Shelly
Gartner, Danielle
Moeller, F. Gerard
Jain, Praduman
author_facet Plunk, Andrew
Sheehan, Brynn
Orr, Shelly
Gartner, Danielle
Moeller, F. Gerard
Jain, Praduman
author_sort Plunk, Andrew
collection PubMed
description Public distrust in the US pandemic response has significantly hindered its effectiveness. In this community-based participatory research mixed-methods study, based on two datasets, we examined how distrust in COVID-19 vaccines relates to institutional distrust. We found that the Johnson & Johnson vaccine pause undermined trust in COVID-19 vaccines in general. Findings also suggest that vaccine distrust developed after participating in a study on COVID-19 testing. Increased distrust may be an unintended consequence of how healthcare and public health activities are presented and delivered, and research participation is structured. Both will continue without proactively addressing the root causes of distrust.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9794956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97949562022-12-30 Stemming the tide of distrust: A mixed-methods study of vaccine hesitancy Plunk, Andrew Sheehan, Brynn Orr, Shelly Gartner, Danielle Moeller, F. Gerard Jain, Praduman J Clin Transl Sci Brief Report Public distrust in the US pandemic response has significantly hindered its effectiveness. In this community-based participatory research mixed-methods study, based on two datasets, we examined how distrust in COVID-19 vaccines relates to institutional distrust. We found that the Johnson & Johnson vaccine pause undermined trust in COVID-19 vaccines in general. Findings also suggest that vaccine distrust developed after participating in a study on COVID-19 testing. Increased distrust may be an unintended consequence of how healthcare and public health activities are presented and delivered, and research participation is structured. Both will continue without proactively addressing the root causes of distrust. Cambridge University Press 2022-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9794956/ /pubmed/36590354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.492 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Plunk, Andrew
Sheehan, Brynn
Orr, Shelly
Gartner, Danielle
Moeller, F. Gerard
Jain, Praduman
Stemming the tide of distrust: A mixed-methods study of vaccine hesitancy
title Stemming the tide of distrust: A mixed-methods study of vaccine hesitancy
title_full Stemming the tide of distrust: A mixed-methods study of vaccine hesitancy
title_fullStr Stemming the tide of distrust: A mixed-methods study of vaccine hesitancy
title_full_unstemmed Stemming the tide of distrust: A mixed-methods study of vaccine hesitancy
title_short Stemming the tide of distrust: A mixed-methods study of vaccine hesitancy
title_sort stemming the tide of distrust: a mixed-methods study of vaccine hesitancy
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9794956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36590354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.492
work_keys_str_mv AT plunkandrew stemmingthetideofdistrustamixedmethodsstudyofvaccinehesitancy
AT sheehanbrynn stemmingthetideofdistrustamixedmethodsstudyofvaccinehesitancy
AT orrshelly stemmingthetideofdistrustamixedmethodsstudyofvaccinehesitancy
AT gartnerdanielle stemmingthetideofdistrustamixedmethodsstudyofvaccinehesitancy
AT moellerfgerard stemmingthetideofdistrustamixedmethodsstudyofvaccinehesitancy
AT jainpraduman stemmingthetideofdistrustamixedmethodsstudyofvaccinehesitancy