Cargando…
A critical guide to the automated quantification of perivascular spaces in magnetic resonance imaging
The glymphatic system is responsible for waste clearance in the brain. It is comprised of perivascular spaces (PVS) that surround penetrating blood vessels. These spaces are filled with cerebrospinal fluid and interstitial fluid, and can be seen with magnetic resonance imaging. Various algorithms ha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9795229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36590285 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.1021311 |
_version_ | 1784860212855832576 |
---|---|
author | Pham, William Lynch, Miranda Spitz, Gershon O’Brien, Terence Vivash, Lucy Sinclair, Benjamin Law, Meng |
author_facet | Pham, William Lynch, Miranda Spitz, Gershon O’Brien, Terence Vivash, Lucy Sinclair, Benjamin Law, Meng |
author_sort | Pham, William |
collection | PubMed |
description | The glymphatic system is responsible for waste clearance in the brain. It is comprised of perivascular spaces (PVS) that surround penetrating blood vessels. These spaces are filled with cerebrospinal fluid and interstitial fluid, and can be seen with magnetic resonance imaging. Various algorithms have been developed to automatically label these spaces in MRI. This has enabled volumetric and morphological analyses of PVS in healthy and disease cohorts. However, there remain inconsistencies between PVS measures reported by different methods of automated segmentation. The present review emphasizes that importance of voxel-wise evaluation of model performance, mainly with the Sørensen Dice similarity coefficient. Conventional count correlations for model validation are inadequate if the goal is to assess volumetric or morphological measures of PVS. The downside of voxel-wise evaluation is that it requires manual segmentations that require large amounts of time to produce. One possible solution is to derive these semi-automatically. Additionally, recommendations are made to facilitate rigorous development and validation of automated PVS segmentation models. In the application of automated PVS segmentation tools, publication of image quality metrics, such as the contrast-to-noise ratio, alongside descriptive statistics of PVS volumes and counts will facilitate comparability between studies. Lastly, a head-to-head comparison between two algorithms, applied to two cohorts of astronauts reveals how results can differ substantially between techniques. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9795229 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97952292022-12-29 A critical guide to the automated quantification of perivascular spaces in magnetic resonance imaging Pham, William Lynch, Miranda Spitz, Gershon O’Brien, Terence Vivash, Lucy Sinclair, Benjamin Law, Meng Front Neurosci Neuroscience The glymphatic system is responsible for waste clearance in the brain. It is comprised of perivascular spaces (PVS) that surround penetrating blood vessels. These spaces are filled with cerebrospinal fluid and interstitial fluid, and can be seen with magnetic resonance imaging. Various algorithms have been developed to automatically label these spaces in MRI. This has enabled volumetric and morphological analyses of PVS in healthy and disease cohorts. However, there remain inconsistencies between PVS measures reported by different methods of automated segmentation. The present review emphasizes that importance of voxel-wise evaluation of model performance, mainly with the Sørensen Dice similarity coefficient. Conventional count correlations for model validation are inadequate if the goal is to assess volumetric or morphological measures of PVS. The downside of voxel-wise evaluation is that it requires manual segmentations that require large amounts of time to produce. One possible solution is to derive these semi-automatically. Additionally, recommendations are made to facilitate rigorous development and validation of automated PVS segmentation models. In the application of automated PVS segmentation tools, publication of image quality metrics, such as the contrast-to-noise ratio, alongside descriptive statistics of PVS volumes and counts will facilitate comparability between studies. Lastly, a head-to-head comparison between two algorithms, applied to two cohorts of astronauts reveals how results can differ substantially between techniques. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9795229/ /pubmed/36590285 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.1021311 Text en Copyright © 2022 Pham, Lynch, Spitz, O’Brien, Vivash, Sinclair and Law. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Pham, William Lynch, Miranda Spitz, Gershon O’Brien, Terence Vivash, Lucy Sinclair, Benjamin Law, Meng A critical guide to the automated quantification of perivascular spaces in magnetic resonance imaging |
title | A critical guide to the automated quantification of perivascular spaces in magnetic resonance imaging |
title_full | A critical guide to the automated quantification of perivascular spaces in magnetic resonance imaging |
title_fullStr | A critical guide to the automated quantification of perivascular spaces in magnetic resonance imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | A critical guide to the automated quantification of perivascular spaces in magnetic resonance imaging |
title_short | A critical guide to the automated quantification of perivascular spaces in magnetic resonance imaging |
title_sort | critical guide to the automated quantification of perivascular spaces in magnetic resonance imaging |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9795229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36590285 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.1021311 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT phamwilliam acriticalguidetotheautomatedquantificationofperivascularspacesinmagneticresonanceimaging AT lynchmiranda acriticalguidetotheautomatedquantificationofperivascularspacesinmagneticresonanceimaging AT spitzgershon acriticalguidetotheautomatedquantificationofperivascularspacesinmagneticresonanceimaging AT obrienterence acriticalguidetotheautomatedquantificationofperivascularspacesinmagneticresonanceimaging AT vivashlucy acriticalguidetotheautomatedquantificationofperivascularspacesinmagneticresonanceimaging AT sinclairbenjamin acriticalguidetotheautomatedquantificationofperivascularspacesinmagneticresonanceimaging AT lawmeng acriticalguidetotheautomatedquantificationofperivascularspacesinmagneticresonanceimaging AT phamwilliam criticalguidetotheautomatedquantificationofperivascularspacesinmagneticresonanceimaging AT lynchmiranda criticalguidetotheautomatedquantificationofperivascularspacesinmagneticresonanceimaging AT spitzgershon criticalguidetotheautomatedquantificationofperivascularspacesinmagneticresonanceimaging AT obrienterence criticalguidetotheautomatedquantificationofperivascularspacesinmagneticresonanceimaging AT vivashlucy criticalguidetotheautomatedquantificationofperivascularspacesinmagneticresonanceimaging AT sinclairbenjamin criticalguidetotheautomatedquantificationofperivascularspacesinmagneticresonanceimaging AT lawmeng criticalguidetotheautomatedquantificationofperivascularspacesinmagneticresonanceimaging |