Cargando…
Outcomes of re-irradiation for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma
BACKGROUND: To predict the outcome of reirradiation (re-RT) for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). METHODS: Eighty-three patients met the criterion of having previously irradiated OSCC treated via curative intent re-RT for recurrent or new primary OSCC. The exclusion criteria were a subopti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Chang Gung University
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9795343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34968771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2021.12.005 |
_version_ | 1784860239126855680 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Yen-Chao Fan, Kang-Hsing Lin, Chien-Yu Kang, Chung-Jan Huang, Shiang-Fu Wang, Hung-Ming Cheng, Ann-Joy Chang, Joseph Tung-Chieh |
author_facet | Chen, Yen-Chao Fan, Kang-Hsing Lin, Chien-Yu Kang, Chung-Jan Huang, Shiang-Fu Wang, Hung-Ming Cheng, Ann-Joy Chang, Joseph Tung-Chieh |
author_sort | Chen, Yen-Chao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To predict the outcome of reirradiation (re-RT) for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). METHODS: Eighty-three patients met the criterion of having previously irradiated OSCC treated via curative intent re-RT for recurrent or new primary OSCC. The exclusion criteria were a suboptimal dose (<45 Gy) for the first RT and palliative intent for the second irradiation. Re-RT was defined as at least 75% volume at second RT after receiving at least 45 Gy at the first RT. RESULTS: The 2-year locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 20% and 28%. For LRPFS, four predictors were noted through univariate analyses: performance status (PS) (p = 0.001), a dose of at least 60 Gy (p = 0.001), stage IVB (p = 0.020), and surgery before re-RT (p = 0.041). In multivariate analyses, only PS (p = 0.005) and a dose of at least 60 Gy (p = 0.001) remained significant. For OS, PS (p = 0.001) and a dose of at least 60 Gy (p = 0.042) were still independently associated predictors, but surgery before re-RT became marginally beneficial (p = 0.053). For patients with a poor PS (ECOG = 2–3), the 2-year OS was only 4.5%. Twenty-nine percent of the patients experienced severe late complications (≥Grade 3), and 18% had new episodes of osteoradionecrosis during their follow-up. CONCLUSION: We identified PS and a re-RT dose ≥60 Gy as predictors for LRPFS and OS. Surgery before re-RT might improve OS. However, the treatment results of re-RT for OSCC were suboptimal. Prospective trials using modern RT techniques, in combination with new therapeutic drugs or radioenhancers, are warranted for improving these dismal outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9795343 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Chang Gung University |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97953432023-01-03 Outcomes of re-irradiation for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma Chen, Yen-Chao Fan, Kang-Hsing Lin, Chien-Yu Kang, Chung-Jan Huang, Shiang-Fu Wang, Hung-Ming Cheng, Ann-Joy Chang, Joseph Tung-Chieh Biomed J Original Article BACKGROUND: To predict the outcome of reirradiation (re-RT) for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). METHODS: Eighty-three patients met the criterion of having previously irradiated OSCC treated via curative intent re-RT for recurrent or new primary OSCC. The exclusion criteria were a suboptimal dose (<45 Gy) for the first RT and palliative intent for the second irradiation. Re-RT was defined as at least 75% volume at second RT after receiving at least 45 Gy at the first RT. RESULTS: The 2-year locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 20% and 28%. For LRPFS, four predictors were noted through univariate analyses: performance status (PS) (p = 0.001), a dose of at least 60 Gy (p = 0.001), stage IVB (p = 0.020), and surgery before re-RT (p = 0.041). In multivariate analyses, only PS (p = 0.005) and a dose of at least 60 Gy (p = 0.001) remained significant. For OS, PS (p = 0.001) and a dose of at least 60 Gy (p = 0.042) were still independently associated predictors, but surgery before re-RT became marginally beneficial (p = 0.053). For patients with a poor PS (ECOG = 2–3), the 2-year OS was only 4.5%. Twenty-nine percent of the patients experienced severe late complications (≥Grade 3), and 18% had new episodes of osteoradionecrosis during their follow-up. CONCLUSION: We identified PS and a re-RT dose ≥60 Gy as predictors for LRPFS and OS. Surgery before re-RT might improve OS. However, the treatment results of re-RT for OSCC were suboptimal. Prospective trials using modern RT techniques, in combination with new therapeutic drugs or radioenhancers, are warranted for improving these dismal outcomes. Chang Gung University 2022-12 2021-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9795343/ /pubmed/34968771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2021.12.005 Text en © 2022 Chang Gung University. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Chen, Yen-Chao Fan, Kang-Hsing Lin, Chien-Yu Kang, Chung-Jan Huang, Shiang-Fu Wang, Hung-Ming Cheng, Ann-Joy Chang, Joseph Tung-Chieh Outcomes of re-irradiation for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma |
title | Outcomes of re-irradiation for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma |
title_full | Outcomes of re-irradiation for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma |
title_fullStr | Outcomes of re-irradiation for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes of re-irradiation for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma |
title_short | Outcomes of re-irradiation for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma |
title_sort | outcomes of re-irradiation for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9795343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34968771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2021.12.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenyenchao outcomesofreirradiationfororalcavitysquamouscellcarcinoma AT fankanghsing outcomesofreirradiationfororalcavitysquamouscellcarcinoma AT linchienyu outcomesofreirradiationfororalcavitysquamouscellcarcinoma AT kangchungjan outcomesofreirradiationfororalcavitysquamouscellcarcinoma AT huangshiangfu outcomesofreirradiationfororalcavitysquamouscellcarcinoma AT wanghungming outcomesofreirradiationfororalcavitysquamouscellcarcinoma AT chengannjoy outcomesofreirradiationfororalcavitysquamouscellcarcinoma AT changjosephtungchieh outcomesofreirradiationfororalcavitysquamouscellcarcinoma |