Cargando…

Outcomes of re-irradiation for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND: To predict the outcome of reirradiation (re-RT) for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). METHODS: Eighty-three patients met the criterion of having previously irradiated OSCC treated via curative intent re-RT for recurrent or new primary OSCC. The exclusion criteria were a subopti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Yen-Chao, Fan, Kang-Hsing, Lin, Chien-Yu, Kang, Chung-Jan, Huang, Shiang-Fu, Wang, Hung-Ming, Cheng, Ann-Joy, Chang, Joseph Tung-Chieh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Chang Gung University 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9795343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34968771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2021.12.005
_version_ 1784860239126855680
author Chen, Yen-Chao
Fan, Kang-Hsing
Lin, Chien-Yu
Kang, Chung-Jan
Huang, Shiang-Fu
Wang, Hung-Ming
Cheng, Ann-Joy
Chang, Joseph Tung-Chieh
author_facet Chen, Yen-Chao
Fan, Kang-Hsing
Lin, Chien-Yu
Kang, Chung-Jan
Huang, Shiang-Fu
Wang, Hung-Ming
Cheng, Ann-Joy
Chang, Joseph Tung-Chieh
author_sort Chen, Yen-Chao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To predict the outcome of reirradiation (re-RT) for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). METHODS: Eighty-three patients met the criterion of having previously irradiated OSCC treated via curative intent re-RT for recurrent or new primary OSCC. The exclusion criteria were a suboptimal dose (<45 Gy) for the first RT and palliative intent for the second irradiation. Re-RT was defined as at least 75% volume at second RT after receiving at least 45 Gy at the first RT. RESULTS: The 2-year locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 20% and 28%. For LRPFS, four predictors were noted through univariate analyses: performance status (PS) (p = 0.001), a dose of at least 60 Gy (p = 0.001), stage IVB (p = 0.020), and surgery before re-RT (p = 0.041). In multivariate analyses, only PS (p = 0.005) and a dose of at least 60 Gy (p = 0.001) remained significant. For OS, PS (p = 0.001) and a dose of at least 60 Gy (p = 0.042) were still independently associated predictors, but surgery before re-RT became marginally beneficial (p = 0.053). For patients with a poor PS (ECOG = 2–3), the 2-year OS was only 4.5%. Twenty-nine percent of the patients experienced severe late complications (≥Grade 3), and 18% had new episodes of osteoradionecrosis during their follow-up. CONCLUSION: We identified PS and a re-RT dose ≥60 Gy as predictors for LRPFS and OS. Surgery before re-RT might improve OS. However, the treatment results of re-RT for OSCC were suboptimal. Prospective trials using modern RT techniques, in combination with new therapeutic drugs or radioenhancers, are warranted for improving these dismal outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9795343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Chang Gung University
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97953432023-01-03 Outcomes of re-irradiation for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma Chen, Yen-Chao Fan, Kang-Hsing Lin, Chien-Yu Kang, Chung-Jan Huang, Shiang-Fu Wang, Hung-Ming Cheng, Ann-Joy Chang, Joseph Tung-Chieh Biomed J Original Article BACKGROUND: To predict the outcome of reirradiation (re-RT) for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). METHODS: Eighty-three patients met the criterion of having previously irradiated OSCC treated via curative intent re-RT for recurrent or new primary OSCC. The exclusion criteria were a suboptimal dose (<45 Gy) for the first RT and palliative intent for the second irradiation. Re-RT was defined as at least 75% volume at second RT after receiving at least 45 Gy at the first RT. RESULTS: The 2-year locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 20% and 28%. For LRPFS, four predictors were noted through univariate analyses: performance status (PS) (p = 0.001), a dose of at least 60 Gy (p = 0.001), stage IVB (p = 0.020), and surgery before re-RT (p = 0.041). In multivariate analyses, only PS (p = 0.005) and a dose of at least 60 Gy (p = 0.001) remained significant. For OS, PS (p = 0.001) and a dose of at least 60 Gy (p = 0.042) were still independently associated predictors, but surgery before re-RT became marginally beneficial (p = 0.053). For patients with a poor PS (ECOG = 2–3), the 2-year OS was only 4.5%. Twenty-nine percent of the patients experienced severe late complications (≥Grade 3), and 18% had new episodes of osteoradionecrosis during their follow-up. CONCLUSION: We identified PS and a re-RT dose ≥60 Gy as predictors for LRPFS and OS. Surgery before re-RT might improve OS. However, the treatment results of re-RT for OSCC were suboptimal. Prospective trials using modern RT techniques, in combination with new therapeutic drugs or radioenhancers, are warranted for improving these dismal outcomes. Chang Gung University 2022-12 2021-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9795343/ /pubmed/34968771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2021.12.005 Text en © 2022 Chang Gung University. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Chen, Yen-Chao
Fan, Kang-Hsing
Lin, Chien-Yu
Kang, Chung-Jan
Huang, Shiang-Fu
Wang, Hung-Ming
Cheng, Ann-Joy
Chang, Joseph Tung-Chieh
Outcomes of re-irradiation for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma
title Outcomes of re-irradiation for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma
title_full Outcomes of re-irradiation for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma
title_fullStr Outcomes of re-irradiation for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of re-irradiation for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma
title_short Outcomes of re-irradiation for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma
title_sort outcomes of re-irradiation for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9795343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34968771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2021.12.005
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyenchao outcomesofreirradiationfororalcavitysquamouscellcarcinoma
AT fankanghsing outcomesofreirradiationfororalcavitysquamouscellcarcinoma
AT linchienyu outcomesofreirradiationfororalcavitysquamouscellcarcinoma
AT kangchungjan outcomesofreirradiationfororalcavitysquamouscellcarcinoma
AT huangshiangfu outcomesofreirradiationfororalcavitysquamouscellcarcinoma
AT wanghungming outcomesofreirradiationfororalcavitysquamouscellcarcinoma
AT chengannjoy outcomesofreirradiationfororalcavitysquamouscellcarcinoma
AT changjosephtungchieh outcomesofreirradiationfororalcavitysquamouscellcarcinoma