Cargando…
Estimation of average treatment effect based on a multi-index propensity score
BACKGROUND: Estimating the average effect of a treatment, exposure, or intervention on health outcomes is a primary aim of many medical studies. However, unbalanced covariates between groups can lead to confounding bias when using observational data to estimate the average treatment effect (ATE). In...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9795597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36577950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01822-3 |
_version_ | 1784860296314093568 |
---|---|
author | Xu, Jiaqin Wei, Kecheng Wang, Ce Huang, Chen Xue, Yaxin Zhang, Rui Qin, Guoyou Yu, Yongfu |
author_facet | Xu, Jiaqin Wei, Kecheng Wang, Ce Huang, Chen Xue, Yaxin Zhang, Rui Qin, Guoyou Yu, Yongfu |
author_sort | Xu, Jiaqin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Estimating the average effect of a treatment, exposure, or intervention on health outcomes is a primary aim of many medical studies. However, unbalanced covariates between groups can lead to confounding bias when using observational data to estimate the average treatment effect (ATE). In this study, we proposed an estimator to correct confounding bias and provide multiple protection for estimation consistency. METHODS: With reference to the kernel function-based double-index propensity score (Ker.DiPS) estimator, we proposed the artificial neural network-based multi-index propensity score (ANN.MiPS) estimator. The ANN.MiPS estimator employed the artificial neural network to estimate the MiPS that combines the information from multiple candidate models for propensity score and outcome regression. A Monte Carlo simulation study was designed to evaluate the performance of the proposed ANN.MiPS estimator. Furthermore, we applied our estimator to real data to discuss its practicability. RESULTS: The simulation study showed the bias of the ANN.MiPS estimators is very small and the standard error is similar if any one of the candidate models is correctly specified under all evaluated sample sizes, treatment rates, and covariate types. Compared to the kernel function-based estimator, the ANN.MiPS estimator usually yields smaller standard error when the correct model is incorporated in the estimator. The empirical study indicated the point estimation for ATE and its bootstrap standard error of the ANN.MiPS estimator is stable under different model specifications. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed estimator extended the combination of information from two models to multiple models and achieved multiply robust estimation for ATE. Extra efficiency was gained by our estimator compared to the kernel-based estimator. The proposed estimator provided a novel approach for estimating the causal effects in observational studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-022-01822-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9795597 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97955972022-12-29 Estimation of average treatment effect based on a multi-index propensity score Xu, Jiaqin Wei, Kecheng Wang, Ce Huang, Chen Xue, Yaxin Zhang, Rui Qin, Guoyou Yu, Yongfu BMC Med Res Methodol Research BACKGROUND: Estimating the average effect of a treatment, exposure, or intervention on health outcomes is a primary aim of many medical studies. However, unbalanced covariates between groups can lead to confounding bias when using observational data to estimate the average treatment effect (ATE). In this study, we proposed an estimator to correct confounding bias and provide multiple protection for estimation consistency. METHODS: With reference to the kernel function-based double-index propensity score (Ker.DiPS) estimator, we proposed the artificial neural network-based multi-index propensity score (ANN.MiPS) estimator. The ANN.MiPS estimator employed the artificial neural network to estimate the MiPS that combines the information from multiple candidate models for propensity score and outcome regression. A Monte Carlo simulation study was designed to evaluate the performance of the proposed ANN.MiPS estimator. Furthermore, we applied our estimator to real data to discuss its practicability. RESULTS: The simulation study showed the bias of the ANN.MiPS estimators is very small and the standard error is similar if any one of the candidate models is correctly specified under all evaluated sample sizes, treatment rates, and covariate types. Compared to the kernel function-based estimator, the ANN.MiPS estimator usually yields smaller standard error when the correct model is incorporated in the estimator. The empirical study indicated the point estimation for ATE and its bootstrap standard error of the ANN.MiPS estimator is stable under different model specifications. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed estimator extended the combination of information from two models to multiple models and achieved multiply robust estimation for ATE. Extra efficiency was gained by our estimator compared to the kernel-based estimator. The proposed estimator provided a novel approach for estimating the causal effects in observational studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-022-01822-3. BioMed Central 2022-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9795597/ /pubmed/36577950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01822-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Xu, Jiaqin Wei, Kecheng Wang, Ce Huang, Chen Xue, Yaxin Zhang, Rui Qin, Guoyou Yu, Yongfu Estimation of average treatment effect based on a multi-index propensity score |
title | Estimation of average treatment effect based on a multi-index propensity score |
title_full | Estimation of average treatment effect based on a multi-index propensity score |
title_fullStr | Estimation of average treatment effect based on a multi-index propensity score |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimation of average treatment effect based on a multi-index propensity score |
title_short | Estimation of average treatment effect based on a multi-index propensity score |
title_sort | estimation of average treatment effect based on a multi-index propensity score |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9795597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36577950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01822-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xujiaqin estimationofaveragetreatmenteffectbasedonamultiindexpropensityscore AT weikecheng estimationofaveragetreatmenteffectbasedonamultiindexpropensityscore AT wangce estimationofaveragetreatmenteffectbasedonamultiindexpropensityscore AT huangchen estimationofaveragetreatmenteffectbasedonamultiindexpropensityscore AT xueyaxin estimationofaveragetreatmenteffectbasedonamultiindexpropensityscore AT zhangrui estimationofaveragetreatmenteffectbasedonamultiindexpropensityscore AT qinguoyou estimationofaveragetreatmenteffectbasedonamultiindexpropensityscore AT yuyongfu estimationofaveragetreatmenteffectbasedonamultiindexpropensityscore |