Cargando…

Estimation of average treatment effect based on a multi-index propensity score

BACKGROUND: Estimating the average effect of a treatment, exposure, or intervention on health outcomes is a primary aim of many medical studies. However, unbalanced covariates between groups can lead to confounding bias when using observational data to estimate the average treatment effect (ATE). In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Jiaqin, Wei, Kecheng, Wang, Ce, Huang, Chen, Xue, Yaxin, Zhang, Rui, Qin, Guoyou, Yu, Yongfu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9795597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36577950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01822-3
_version_ 1784860296314093568
author Xu, Jiaqin
Wei, Kecheng
Wang, Ce
Huang, Chen
Xue, Yaxin
Zhang, Rui
Qin, Guoyou
Yu, Yongfu
author_facet Xu, Jiaqin
Wei, Kecheng
Wang, Ce
Huang, Chen
Xue, Yaxin
Zhang, Rui
Qin, Guoyou
Yu, Yongfu
author_sort Xu, Jiaqin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Estimating the average effect of a treatment, exposure, or intervention on health outcomes is a primary aim of many medical studies. However, unbalanced covariates between groups can lead to confounding bias when using observational data to estimate the average treatment effect (ATE). In this study, we proposed an estimator to correct confounding bias and provide multiple protection for estimation consistency. METHODS: With reference to the kernel function-based double-index propensity score (Ker.DiPS) estimator, we proposed the artificial neural network-based multi-index propensity score (ANN.MiPS) estimator. The ANN.MiPS estimator employed the artificial neural network to estimate the MiPS that combines the information from multiple candidate models for propensity score and outcome regression. A Monte Carlo simulation study was designed to evaluate the performance of the proposed ANN.MiPS estimator. Furthermore, we applied our estimator to real data to discuss its practicability. RESULTS: The simulation study showed the bias of the ANN.MiPS estimators is very small and the standard error is similar if any one of the candidate models is correctly specified under all evaluated sample sizes, treatment rates, and covariate types. Compared to the kernel function-based estimator, the ANN.MiPS estimator usually yields smaller standard error when the correct model is incorporated in the estimator. The empirical study indicated the point estimation for ATE and its bootstrap standard error of the ANN.MiPS estimator is stable under different model specifications. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed estimator extended the combination of information from two models to multiple models and achieved multiply robust estimation for ATE. Extra efficiency was gained by our estimator compared to the kernel-based estimator. The proposed estimator provided a novel approach for estimating the causal effects in observational studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-022-01822-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9795597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97955972022-12-29 Estimation of average treatment effect based on a multi-index propensity score Xu, Jiaqin Wei, Kecheng Wang, Ce Huang, Chen Xue, Yaxin Zhang, Rui Qin, Guoyou Yu, Yongfu BMC Med Res Methodol Research BACKGROUND: Estimating the average effect of a treatment, exposure, or intervention on health outcomes is a primary aim of many medical studies. However, unbalanced covariates between groups can lead to confounding bias when using observational data to estimate the average treatment effect (ATE). In this study, we proposed an estimator to correct confounding bias and provide multiple protection for estimation consistency. METHODS: With reference to the kernel function-based double-index propensity score (Ker.DiPS) estimator, we proposed the artificial neural network-based multi-index propensity score (ANN.MiPS) estimator. The ANN.MiPS estimator employed the artificial neural network to estimate the MiPS that combines the information from multiple candidate models for propensity score and outcome regression. A Monte Carlo simulation study was designed to evaluate the performance of the proposed ANN.MiPS estimator. Furthermore, we applied our estimator to real data to discuss its practicability. RESULTS: The simulation study showed the bias of the ANN.MiPS estimators is very small and the standard error is similar if any one of the candidate models is correctly specified under all evaluated sample sizes, treatment rates, and covariate types. Compared to the kernel function-based estimator, the ANN.MiPS estimator usually yields smaller standard error when the correct model is incorporated in the estimator. The empirical study indicated the point estimation for ATE and its bootstrap standard error of the ANN.MiPS estimator is stable under different model specifications. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed estimator extended the combination of information from two models to multiple models and achieved multiply robust estimation for ATE. Extra efficiency was gained by our estimator compared to the kernel-based estimator. The proposed estimator provided a novel approach for estimating the causal effects in observational studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-022-01822-3. BioMed Central 2022-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9795597/ /pubmed/36577950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01822-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Xu, Jiaqin
Wei, Kecheng
Wang, Ce
Huang, Chen
Xue, Yaxin
Zhang, Rui
Qin, Guoyou
Yu, Yongfu
Estimation of average treatment effect based on a multi-index propensity score
title Estimation of average treatment effect based on a multi-index propensity score
title_full Estimation of average treatment effect based on a multi-index propensity score
title_fullStr Estimation of average treatment effect based on a multi-index propensity score
title_full_unstemmed Estimation of average treatment effect based on a multi-index propensity score
title_short Estimation of average treatment effect based on a multi-index propensity score
title_sort estimation of average treatment effect based on a multi-index propensity score
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9795597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36577950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01822-3
work_keys_str_mv AT xujiaqin estimationofaveragetreatmenteffectbasedonamultiindexpropensityscore
AT weikecheng estimationofaveragetreatmenteffectbasedonamultiindexpropensityscore
AT wangce estimationofaveragetreatmenteffectbasedonamultiindexpropensityscore
AT huangchen estimationofaveragetreatmenteffectbasedonamultiindexpropensityscore
AT xueyaxin estimationofaveragetreatmenteffectbasedonamultiindexpropensityscore
AT zhangrui estimationofaveragetreatmenteffectbasedonamultiindexpropensityscore
AT qinguoyou estimationofaveragetreatmenteffectbasedonamultiindexpropensityscore
AT yuyongfu estimationofaveragetreatmenteffectbasedonamultiindexpropensityscore