Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of efficacy of different irrigation devices in removal of calcium hydroxide in teeth with simulated internal resorption cavities – An in vitro study

AIM: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the efficacy of newly developed irrigation systems, i.e., XP-endo Finisher file (XP-endo), EndoActivator (EA), and Endo-Irrigator Plus (EI) with gold standard passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) tip and in removal of calcium hydroxide (CH) from sing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arora, Roshni, Gupta, Tarun, Mirdha, Nitin, Gill, Bobbin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9795696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36591589
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_271_22
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the efficacy of newly developed irrigation systems, i.e., XP-endo Finisher file (XP-endo), EndoActivator (EA), and Endo-Irrigator Plus (EI) with gold standard passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) tip and in removal of calcium hydroxide (CH) from single-rooted teeth with artificial simulated internal resorption cavities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty single-rooted mandibular premolars were decoronated and prepared using the ProTaper Gold system up to F5. Samples were buccolingually sectioned and resorption cavities were prepared. Twenty specimens were served as Group 1 – negative control. In the remaining specimens, CH was delivered and root halves were brought together. Twenty specimens were served as Group 2 – positive control. The remaining specimens were randomly divided into four experimental groups (n = 20), where NaOCl and EDTA were activated using PUI, XP-endo, EA, and EI for 1 min. The remnants of CH were scored and analyzed by employing Kruskal–Wallis H- and Mann–Whitney U-tests. RESULTS: PUI and XP-endo removed more CH than other devices (P < 0.05), showing no significant difference between them. CONCLUSION: None of the tested systems were able to remove CH completely from resorption cavities. PUI and XP-endo were superior to other tested devices.