Cargando…

In vivo peripheral nerve activation using sinusoidal low‐frequency alternating currents

BACKGROUND: The sinusoidal low‐frequency alternating current (LFAC) waveform was explored recently as a novel means to evoke nerve conduction block. In the present work, we explored whether increasing the amplitude of the LFAC waveform results in nerve fiber activation in autonomic nerves. In‐silico...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alhawwash, Awadh, Muzquiz, M. Ivette, Richardson, Lindsay, Vetter, Christian, Smolik, Macallister, Goodwill, Adam, Yoshida, Ken
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9795871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35730955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aor.14347
_version_ 1784860351942098944
author Alhawwash, Awadh
Muzquiz, M. Ivette
Richardson, Lindsay
Vetter, Christian
Smolik, Macallister
Goodwill, Adam
Yoshida, Ken
author_facet Alhawwash, Awadh
Muzquiz, M. Ivette
Richardson, Lindsay
Vetter, Christian
Smolik, Macallister
Goodwill, Adam
Yoshida, Ken
author_sort Alhawwash, Awadh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The sinusoidal low‐frequency alternating current (LFAC) waveform was explored recently as a novel means to evoke nerve conduction block. In the present work, we explored whether increasing the amplitude of the LFAC waveform results in nerve fiber activation in autonomic nerves. In‐silico methods and preliminary work in somatic nerves indicated a potential frequency dependency on the threshold of activation. The Hering‐Breuer (HB) reflex was used as a biomarker to detect cervical vagus nerve activation. METHODS: Experiments were conducted in isoflurane‐anesthetized swine (n = 5). Two stimulating bipolar cuff electrodes and a tripolar recording cuff electrode were implanted on the left vagus nerve. To ensure the electrical stimulation affects only the afferent pathways, the nerve was crushed caudal to the electrodes to eliminate cardiac effects. (1) Standard pulse stimulation (Vstim) using a monophasic train of pulses was applied through the caudal electrode to elicit HB reflex and to identify the activated nerve fiber type. (2) Continuous sinusoidal LFAC waveform with a frequency ranging from 5 through 20 Hz was applied to the rostral electrode without Vstim to explore the activation thresholds at each LFAC frequency. In both cases, the activation of nerve fibers was detected by a HB reflex‐induced reduction in the breathing rate. RESULTS: LFAC was found to be capable of eliciting an HB response. The LFAC activation thresholds were found to be frequency‐dependent. The HB threshold was 1.02 ± 0.3 mA(p) at 5 Hz, 0.66 ± 0.3 mA(p) at 10 Hz, and 0.44 ± 0.2 mA(p) at 20 Hz. In comparison, it was 0.7 ± 0.47 mA for a 100 μs pulse. The LFAC amplitude was within the linear limits of the electrode interface. Damage to the cuff electrodes or the nerve tissues was not observed. Analysis of Vstim‐based compound nerve action potentials (CNAP) indicated that the decrease in breathing rate was found to be correlated with the activation of slower components of the CNAP suggesting that LFAC reached and elicited responses from these slower fibers associated with afferents projecting to the HB response. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest the feasibility of the LFAC waveform at 5, 10, and 20 Hz to activate autonomic nerve fibers and potentially provide a new modality to the neurorehabilitation field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9795871
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97958712022-12-28 In vivo peripheral nerve activation using sinusoidal low‐frequency alternating currents Alhawwash, Awadh Muzquiz, M. Ivette Richardson, Lindsay Vetter, Christian Smolik, Macallister Goodwill, Adam Yoshida, Ken Artif Organs Main Text BACKGROUND: The sinusoidal low‐frequency alternating current (LFAC) waveform was explored recently as a novel means to evoke nerve conduction block. In the present work, we explored whether increasing the amplitude of the LFAC waveform results in nerve fiber activation in autonomic nerves. In‐silico methods and preliminary work in somatic nerves indicated a potential frequency dependency on the threshold of activation. The Hering‐Breuer (HB) reflex was used as a biomarker to detect cervical vagus nerve activation. METHODS: Experiments were conducted in isoflurane‐anesthetized swine (n = 5). Two stimulating bipolar cuff electrodes and a tripolar recording cuff electrode were implanted on the left vagus nerve. To ensure the electrical stimulation affects only the afferent pathways, the nerve was crushed caudal to the electrodes to eliminate cardiac effects. (1) Standard pulse stimulation (Vstim) using a monophasic train of pulses was applied through the caudal electrode to elicit HB reflex and to identify the activated nerve fiber type. (2) Continuous sinusoidal LFAC waveform with a frequency ranging from 5 through 20 Hz was applied to the rostral electrode without Vstim to explore the activation thresholds at each LFAC frequency. In both cases, the activation of nerve fibers was detected by a HB reflex‐induced reduction in the breathing rate. RESULTS: LFAC was found to be capable of eliciting an HB response. The LFAC activation thresholds were found to be frequency‐dependent. The HB threshold was 1.02 ± 0.3 mA(p) at 5 Hz, 0.66 ± 0.3 mA(p) at 10 Hz, and 0.44 ± 0.2 mA(p) at 20 Hz. In comparison, it was 0.7 ± 0.47 mA for a 100 μs pulse. The LFAC amplitude was within the linear limits of the electrode interface. Damage to the cuff electrodes or the nerve tissues was not observed. Analysis of Vstim‐based compound nerve action potentials (CNAP) indicated that the decrease in breathing rate was found to be correlated with the activation of slower components of the CNAP suggesting that LFAC reached and elicited responses from these slower fibers associated with afferents projecting to the HB response. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest the feasibility of the LFAC waveform at 5, 10, and 20 Hz to activate autonomic nerve fibers and potentially provide a new modality to the neurorehabilitation field. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-30 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9795871/ /pubmed/35730955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aor.14347 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Artificial Organs published by International Center for Artificial Organ and Transplantation (ICAOT) and Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Main Text
Alhawwash, Awadh
Muzquiz, M. Ivette
Richardson, Lindsay
Vetter, Christian
Smolik, Macallister
Goodwill, Adam
Yoshida, Ken
In vivo peripheral nerve activation using sinusoidal low‐frequency alternating currents
title In vivo peripheral nerve activation using sinusoidal low‐frequency alternating currents
title_full In vivo peripheral nerve activation using sinusoidal low‐frequency alternating currents
title_fullStr In vivo peripheral nerve activation using sinusoidal low‐frequency alternating currents
title_full_unstemmed In vivo peripheral nerve activation using sinusoidal low‐frequency alternating currents
title_short In vivo peripheral nerve activation using sinusoidal low‐frequency alternating currents
title_sort in vivo peripheral nerve activation using sinusoidal low‐frequency alternating currents
topic Main Text
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9795871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35730955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aor.14347
work_keys_str_mv AT alhawwashawadh invivoperipheralnerveactivationusingsinusoidallowfrequencyalternatingcurrents
AT muzquizmivette invivoperipheralnerveactivationusingsinusoidallowfrequencyalternatingcurrents
AT richardsonlindsay invivoperipheralnerveactivationusingsinusoidallowfrequencyalternatingcurrents
AT vetterchristian invivoperipheralnerveactivationusingsinusoidallowfrequencyalternatingcurrents
AT smolikmacallister invivoperipheralnerveactivationusingsinusoidallowfrequencyalternatingcurrents
AT goodwilladam invivoperipheralnerveactivationusingsinusoidallowfrequencyalternatingcurrents
AT yoshidaken invivoperipheralnerveactivationusingsinusoidallowfrequencyalternatingcurrents