Cargando…

Validation of a simplified intravascular ultrasound core lab analysis method in stented coronary arteries

OBJECTIVES: To validate a simplified core laboratory intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analysis method based on frames with visually determined minimal lumen areas (MLAs) as compared with a comprehensive (per frame) analysis method. BACKGROUND: IVUS‐guided percutaneous coronary intervention has proven...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neleman, Tara, Khachabi, Jamal, Jonker, Hans, Rademaker‐Havinga, Tessa, Spitzer, Ernest, Daemen, Joost
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9795929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35811460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.30321
_version_ 1784860365708853248
author Neleman, Tara
Khachabi, Jamal
Jonker, Hans
Rademaker‐Havinga, Tessa
Spitzer, Ernest
Daemen, Joost
author_facet Neleman, Tara
Khachabi, Jamal
Jonker, Hans
Rademaker‐Havinga, Tessa
Spitzer, Ernest
Daemen, Joost
author_sort Neleman, Tara
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To validate a simplified core laboratory intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analysis method based on frames with visually determined minimal lumen areas (MLAs) as compared with a comprehensive (per frame) analysis method. BACKGROUND: IVUS‐guided percutaneous coronary intervention has proven to be superior to angiography‐guided stenting. In clinical practice, cross‐sections with visually determined MLA are measured to determine lesion severity or minimal stent area (MSA), however, its accuracy has not been compared with a comprehensive per frame analysis method. METHODS: A total of 50 stented coronary segments of anonymized core lab datasets were analyzed using a comprehensive analysis method and reanalyzed by two core lab analysts using the simplified method including a maximum of seven frames to be analyzed (the visually determined MSA, the first and last frame, and the MLA of each reference segment). The main parameters of interest were MSA, MLA in the reference segments, and plaque burden. RESULTS: The simplified method showed moderate agreement for measurement of the proximal MLA (7.51 ± 2.52 vs. 6.32 ± 1.88 mm(2), intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.73), good agreement for the distal MLA (5.41 ± 1.85 vs. 5.11 ± 1.38 mm(2), ICC = 0.84) and plaque burden proximal (0.49 ± 0.12 vs. 0.50 ± 0.11, ICC = 0.88), and excellent agreement for the MSA (5.35 ± 1.05 vs. 5.32 ± 0.99 mm(2), ICC = 0.94) and plaque burden distal (0.47 ± 0.14 vs. 0.47 ± 0.12, ICC = 0.92), when compared with the comprehensive analysis method. Inter‐ and intraobserver analysis revealed good‐to‐excellent agreement for all parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring poststenting IVUS cross‐sections with visually determined MLAs by experienced core lab analysts is an accurate and reproducible method to identify MLAs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9795929
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97959292022-12-28 Validation of a simplified intravascular ultrasound core lab analysis method in stented coronary arteries Neleman, Tara Khachabi, Jamal Jonker, Hans Rademaker‐Havinga, Tessa Spitzer, Ernest Daemen, Joost Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Coronary Artery Disease OBJECTIVES: To validate a simplified core laboratory intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analysis method based on frames with visually determined minimal lumen areas (MLAs) as compared with a comprehensive (per frame) analysis method. BACKGROUND: IVUS‐guided percutaneous coronary intervention has proven to be superior to angiography‐guided stenting. In clinical practice, cross‐sections with visually determined MLA are measured to determine lesion severity or minimal stent area (MSA), however, its accuracy has not been compared with a comprehensive per frame analysis method. METHODS: A total of 50 stented coronary segments of anonymized core lab datasets were analyzed using a comprehensive analysis method and reanalyzed by two core lab analysts using the simplified method including a maximum of seven frames to be analyzed (the visually determined MSA, the first and last frame, and the MLA of each reference segment). The main parameters of interest were MSA, MLA in the reference segments, and plaque burden. RESULTS: The simplified method showed moderate agreement for measurement of the proximal MLA (7.51 ± 2.52 vs. 6.32 ± 1.88 mm(2), intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.73), good agreement for the distal MLA (5.41 ± 1.85 vs. 5.11 ± 1.38 mm(2), ICC = 0.84) and plaque burden proximal (0.49 ± 0.12 vs. 0.50 ± 0.11, ICC = 0.88), and excellent agreement for the MSA (5.35 ± 1.05 vs. 5.32 ± 0.99 mm(2), ICC = 0.94) and plaque burden distal (0.47 ± 0.14 vs. 0.47 ± 0.12, ICC = 0.92), when compared with the comprehensive analysis method. Inter‐ and intraobserver analysis revealed good‐to‐excellent agreement for all parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring poststenting IVUS cross‐sections with visually determined MLAs by experienced core lab analysts is an accurate and reproducible method to identify MLAs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-10 2022-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9795929/ /pubmed/35811460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.30321 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Coronary Artery Disease
Neleman, Tara
Khachabi, Jamal
Jonker, Hans
Rademaker‐Havinga, Tessa
Spitzer, Ernest
Daemen, Joost
Validation of a simplified intravascular ultrasound core lab analysis method in stented coronary arteries
title Validation of a simplified intravascular ultrasound core lab analysis method in stented coronary arteries
title_full Validation of a simplified intravascular ultrasound core lab analysis method in stented coronary arteries
title_fullStr Validation of a simplified intravascular ultrasound core lab analysis method in stented coronary arteries
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a simplified intravascular ultrasound core lab analysis method in stented coronary arteries
title_short Validation of a simplified intravascular ultrasound core lab analysis method in stented coronary arteries
title_sort validation of a simplified intravascular ultrasound core lab analysis method in stented coronary arteries
topic Coronary Artery Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9795929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35811460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.30321
work_keys_str_mv AT nelemantara validationofasimplifiedintravascularultrasoundcorelabanalysismethodinstentedcoronaryarteries
AT khachabijamal validationofasimplifiedintravascularultrasoundcorelabanalysismethodinstentedcoronaryarteries
AT jonkerhans validationofasimplifiedintravascularultrasoundcorelabanalysismethodinstentedcoronaryarteries
AT rademakerhavingatessa validationofasimplifiedintravascularultrasoundcorelabanalysismethodinstentedcoronaryarteries
AT spitzerernest validationofasimplifiedintravascularultrasoundcorelabanalysismethodinstentedcoronaryarteries
AT daemenjoost validationofasimplifiedintravascularultrasoundcorelabanalysismethodinstentedcoronaryarteries