Cargando…
Validation of a simplified intravascular ultrasound core lab analysis method in stented coronary arteries
OBJECTIVES: To validate a simplified core laboratory intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analysis method based on frames with visually determined minimal lumen areas (MLAs) as compared with a comprehensive (per frame) analysis method. BACKGROUND: IVUS‐guided percutaneous coronary intervention has proven...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9795929/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35811460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.30321 |
_version_ | 1784860365708853248 |
---|---|
author | Neleman, Tara Khachabi, Jamal Jonker, Hans Rademaker‐Havinga, Tessa Spitzer, Ernest Daemen, Joost |
author_facet | Neleman, Tara Khachabi, Jamal Jonker, Hans Rademaker‐Havinga, Tessa Spitzer, Ernest Daemen, Joost |
author_sort | Neleman, Tara |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To validate a simplified core laboratory intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analysis method based on frames with visually determined minimal lumen areas (MLAs) as compared with a comprehensive (per frame) analysis method. BACKGROUND: IVUS‐guided percutaneous coronary intervention has proven to be superior to angiography‐guided stenting. In clinical practice, cross‐sections with visually determined MLA are measured to determine lesion severity or minimal stent area (MSA), however, its accuracy has not been compared with a comprehensive per frame analysis method. METHODS: A total of 50 stented coronary segments of anonymized core lab datasets were analyzed using a comprehensive analysis method and reanalyzed by two core lab analysts using the simplified method including a maximum of seven frames to be analyzed (the visually determined MSA, the first and last frame, and the MLA of each reference segment). The main parameters of interest were MSA, MLA in the reference segments, and plaque burden. RESULTS: The simplified method showed moderate agreement for measurement of the proximal MLA (7.51 ± 2.52 vs. 6.32 ± 1.88 mm(2), intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.73), good agreement for the distal MLA (5.41 ± 1.85 vs. 5.11 ± 1.38 mm(2), ICC = 0.84) and plaque burden proximal (0.49 ± 0.12 vs. 0.50 ± 0.11, ICC = 0.88), and excellent agreement for the MSA (5.35 ± 1.05 vs. 5.32 ± 0.99 mm(2), ICC = 0.94) and plaque burden distal (0.47 ± 0.14 vs. 0.47 ± 0.12, ICC = 0.92), when compared with the comprehensive analysis method. Inter‐ and intraobserver analysis revealed good‐to‐excellent agreement for all parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring poststenting IVUS cross‐sections with visually determined MLAs by experienced core lab analysts is an accurate and reproducible method to identify MLAs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9795929 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97959292022-12-28 Validation of a simplified intravascular ultrasound core lab analysis method in stented coronary arteries Neleman, Tara Khachabi, Jamal Jonker, Hans Rademaker‐Havinga, Tessa Spitzer, Ernest Daemen, Joost Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Coronary Artery Disease OBJECTIVES: To validate a simplified core laboratory intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analysis method based on frames with visually determined minimal lumen areas (MLAs) as compared with a comprehensive (per frame) analysis method. BACKGROUND: IVUS‐guided percutaneous coronary intervention has proven to be superior to angiography‐guided stenting. In clinical practice, cross‐sections with visually determined MLA are measured to determine lesion severity or minimal stent area (MSA), however, its accuracy has not been compared with a comprehensive per frame analysis method. METHODS: A total of 50 stented coronary segments of anonymized core lab datasets were analyzed using a comprehensive analysis method and reanalyzed by two core lab analysts using the simplified method including a maximum of seven frames to be analyzed (the visually determined MSA, the first and last frame, and the MLA of each reference segment). The main parameters of interest were MSA, MLA in the reference segments, and plaque burden. RESULTS: The simplified method showed moderate agreement for measurement of the proximal MLA (7.51 ± 2.52 vs. 6.32 ± 1.88 mm(2), intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.73), good agreement for the distal MLA (5.41 ± 1.85 vs. 5.11 ± 1.38 mm(2), ICC = 0.84) and plaque burden proximal (0.49 ± 0.12 vs. 0.50 ± 0.11, ICC = 0.88), and excellent agreement for the MSA (5.35 ± 1.05 vs. 5.32 ± 0.99 mm(2), ICC = 0.94) and plaque burden distal (0.47 ± 0.14 vs. 0.47 ± 0.12, ICC = 0.92), when compared with the comprehensive analysis method. Inter‐ and intraobserver analysis revealed good‐to‐excellent agreement for all parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring poststenting IVUS cross‐sections with visually determined MLAs by experienced core lab analysts is an accurate and reproducible method to identify MLAs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-10 2022-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9795929/ /pubmed/35811460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.30321 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Coronary Artery Disease Neleman, Tara Khachabi, Jamal Jonker, Hans Rademaker‐Havinga, Tessa Spitzer, Ernest Daemen, Joost Validation of a simplified intravascular ultrasound core lab analysis method in stented coronary arteries |
title | Validation of a simplified intravascular ultrasound core lab analysis method in stented coronary arteries |
title_full | Validation of a simplified intravascular ultrasound core lab analysis method in stented coronary arteries |
title_fullStr | Validation of a simplified intravascular ultrasound core lab analysis method in stented coronary arteries |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a simplified intravascular ultrasound core lab analysis method in stented coronary arteries |
title_short | Validation of a simplified intravascular ultrasound core lab analysis method in stented coronary arteries |
title_sort | validation of a simplified intravascular ultrasound core lab analysis method in stented coronary arteries |
topic | Coronary Artery Disease |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9795929/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35811460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.30321 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nelemantara validationofasimplifiedintravascularultrasoundcorelabanalysismethodinstentedcoronaryarteries AT khachabijamal validationofasimplifiedintravascularultrasoundcorelabanalysismethodinstentedcoronaryarteries AT jonkerhans validationofasimplifiedintravascularultrasoundcorelabanalysismethodinstentedcoronaryarteries AT rademakerhavingatessa validationofasimplifiedintravascularultrasoundcorelabanalysismethodinstentedcoronaryarteries AT spitzerernest validationofasimplifiedintravascularultrasoundcorelabanalysismethodinstentedcoronaryarteries AT daemenjoost validationofasimplifiedintravascularultrasoundcorelabanalysismethodinstentedcoronaryarteries |